Loading…

A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models

(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine 2023-01, Vol.12 (3), p.943
Main Authors: Kardach, Hubert, Szponar-Żurowska, Anna, Biedziak, Barbara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 943
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 12
creator Kardach, Hubert
Szponar-Żurowska, Anna
Biedziak, Barbara
description (1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences ( < 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm12030943
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9918167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2774908415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1Lw0AQxRdRbKk9eZeAF0Gi-5Fkdy9iqZ_Qood6XjabaZuSZOtuIvjfu6W1VOcyA-_H4w0PoXOCbxiT-HZlakIxwzJhR6hPMecxZoIdH9w9NPR-hcMIkVDCT1GPZTyTqSR9dD-KxrZea1d620R2Hs0A2mU0Be07BzU0rY-C8F5p34KLdFNED-WibHUVTW0BlT9DJ3NdeRju9gB9PD3Oxi_x5O35dTyaxCbBso2NyQqWE55zDFLkxBhtOHCe48JIghmnnPMEZIIFTlOhC0oNBYMzzWkqAjBAd1vfdZfXUJiQzOlKrV1Za_etrC7VX6Upl2phv5SURJCMB4OrnYGznx34VtWlN1BVugHbeRUCpBlNRJoF9PIfurKda8J7GyqRWCQkDdT1ljLOeu9gvg9DsNqUow7KCfTFYf49-1sF-wGvG4i9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774908415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kardach, Hubert ; Szponar-Żurowska, Anna ; Biedziak, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Kardach, Hubert ; Szponar-Żurowska, Anna ; Biedziak, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences ( &lt; 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030943</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36769591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Clinical medicine ; Laboratories ; Orthodontics ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Research methodology ; Scanners ; Software ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-01, Vol.12 (3), p.943</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6204-4266</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2774908415/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2774908415?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36769591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kardach, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biedziak, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences ( &lt; 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1Lw0AQxRdRbKk9eZeAF0Gi-5Fkdy9iqZ_Qood6XjabaZuSZOtuIvjfu6W1VOcyA-_H4w0PoXOCbxiT-HZlakIxwzJhR6hPMecxZoIdH9w9NPR-hcMIkVDCT1GPZTyTqSR9dD-KxrZea1d620R2Hs0A2mU0Be07BzU0rY-C8F5p34KLdFNED-WibHUVTW0BlT9DJ3NdeRju9gB9PD3Oxi_x5O35dTyaxCbBso2NyQqWE55zDFLkxBhtOHCe48JIghmnnPMEZIIFTlOhC0oNBYMzzWkqAjBAd1vfdZfXUJiQzOlKrV1Za_etrC7VX6Upl2phv5SURJCMB4OrnYGznx34VtWlN1BVugHbeRUCpBlNRJoF9PIfurKda8J7GyqRWCQkDdT1ljLOeu9gvg9DsNqUow7KCfTFYf49-1sF-wGvG4i9</recordid><startdate>20230125</startdate><enddate>20230125</enddate><creator>Kardach, Hubert</creator><creator>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</creator><creator>Biedziak, Barbara</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-4266</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230125</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</title><author>Kardach, Hubert ; Szponar-Żurowska, Anna ; Biedziak, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kardach, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biedziak, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kardach, Hubert</au><au>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</au><au>Biedziak, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2023-01-25</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>943</spage><pages>943-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences ( &lt; 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36769591</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12030943</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-4266</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-01, Vol.12 (3), p.943
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9918167
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Clinical medicine
Laboratories
Orthodontics
Patients
Prostheses
Research methodology
Scanners
Software
Teeth
title A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A20%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Teeth%20Measurements%20on%20Plaster%20and%20Digital%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Kardach,%20Hubert&rft.date=2023-01-25&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=943&rft.pages=943-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12030943&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2774908415%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774908415&rft_id=info:pmid/36769591&rfr_iscdi=true