Loading…
A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models
(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usef...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2023-01, Vol.12 (3), p.943 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 943 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Kardach, Hubert Szponar-Żurowska, Anna Biedziak, Barbara |
description | (1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences (
< 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm12030943 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9918167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2774908415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1Lw0AQxRdRbKk9eZeAF0Gi-5Fkdy9iqZ_Qood6XjabaZuSZOtuIvjfu6W1VOcyA-_H4w0PoXOCbxiT-HZlakIxwzJhR6hPMecxZoIdH9w9NPR-hcMIkVDCT1GPZTyTqSR9dD-KxrZea1d620R2Hs0A2mU0Be07BzU0rY-C8F5p34KLdFNED-WibHUVTW0BlT9DJ3NdeRju9gB9PD3Oxi_x5O35dTyaxCbBso2NyQqWE55zDFLkxBhtOHCe48JIghmnnPMEZIIFTlOhC0oNBYMzzWkqAjBAd1vfdZfXUJiQzOlKrV1Za_etrC7VX6Upl2phv5SURJCMB4OrnYGznx34VtWlN1BVugHbeRUCpBlNRJoF9PIfurKda8J7GyqRWCQkDdT1ljLOeu9gvg9DsNqUow7KCfTFYf49-1sF-wGvG4i9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774908415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kardach, Hubert ; Szponar-Żurowska, Anna ; Biedziak, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Kardach, Hubert ; Szponar-Żurowska, Anna ; Biedziak, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences (
< 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030943</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36769591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Clinical medicine ; Laboratories ; Orthodontics ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Research methodology ; Scanners ; Software ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-01, Vol.12 (3), p.943</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6204-4266</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2774908415/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2774908415?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36769591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kardach, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biedziak, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences (
< 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1Lw0AQxRdRbKk9eZeAF0Gi-5Fkdy9iqZ_Qood6XjabaZuSZOtuIvjfu6W1VOcyA-_H4w0PoXOCbxiT-HZlakIxwzJhR6hPMecxZoIdH9w9NPR-hcMIkVDCT1GPZTyTqSR9dD-KxrZea1d620R2Hs0A2mU0Be07BzU0rY-C8F5p34KLdFNED-WibHUVTW0BlT9DJ3NdeRju9gB9PD3Oxi_x5O35dTyaxCbBso2NyQqWE55zDFLkxBhtOHCe48JIghmnnPMEZIIFTlOhC0oNBYMzzWkqAjBAd1vfdZfXUJiQzOlKrV1Za_etrC7VX6Upl2phv5SURJCMB4OrnYGznx34VtWlN1BVugHbeRUCpBlNRJoF9PIfurKda8J7GyqRWCQkDdT1ljLOeu9gvg9DsNqUow7KCfTFYf49-1sF-wGvG4i9</recordid><startdate>20230125</startdate><enddate>20230125</enddate><creator>Kardach, Hubert</creator><creator>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</creator><creator>Biedziak, Barbara</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-4266</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230125</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</title><author>Kardach, Hubert ; Szponar-Żurowska, Anna ; Biedziak, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kardach, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biedziak, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kardach, Hubert</au><au>Szponar-Żurowska, Anna</au><au>Biedziak, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2023-01-25</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>943</spage><pages>943-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>(1) Background: Modern imaging methods and constantly developing technologies extend the range of diagnostic tools in medicine and in orthodontics. Thanks to them, scientists and doctors can use devices designed to diagnose 3D structures of the human body. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of digital orthodontic models as a diagnostic tool in the work of an orthodontist through a comparative analysis of the value of orthodontic measurements made on traditional plaster models and virtual models. (2) Methods: A total of 80 sets of models were made, including 40 sets of plaster models and 40 sets of digital models. A total of 48 diagnostic parameters were developed. They concerned dental parameters. (3) Results: Comparative analysis of crown height values on plaster and digital models showed statistically significant differences (
< 0.05) in 26 out of 48 dental parameters. (4) Conclusions: The differences between the measurements made with the software on the digital models and the measurements made with the traditional method of measurement using the digital caliper on the plaster models were small and clinically acceptable.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36769591</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12030943</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-4266</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-01, Vol.12 (3), p.943 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9918167 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy Clinical medicine Laboratories Orthodontics Patients Prostheses Research methodology Scanners Software Teeth |
title | A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A20%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Teeth%20Measurements%20on%20Plaster%20and%20Digital%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Kardach,%20Hubert&rft.date=2023-01-25&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=943&rft.pages=943-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12030943&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2774908415%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-cc6d3b17b70e98b1ccac7e77b0dc9103727774e94080558ad22c2ec06a7258103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774908415&rft_id=info:pmid/36769591&rfr_iscdi=true |