Loading…

Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Background Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of gastroenterology 2023-02, Vol.42 (1), p.53-63
Main Authors: Khanna, Puneet, Haritha, Damarla, Das, Aditi, Sarkar, Soumya, Roy, Avishek
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Indian journal of gastroenterology
container_volume 42
creator Khanna, Puneet
Haritha, Damarla
Das, Aditi
Sarkar, Soumya
Roy, Avishek
description Background Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc. Methods An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis. Results We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48; I 2  = 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60; I 2  = 88%), better  nadir SpO 2 level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78; I 2  = 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93; I 2  = 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31, I 2  = 0%). Conclusion HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation. Clinical trial number and registry URL CRD42021245409 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409 ).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9924186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2775952944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRiMEoqXwAiyQl2wC_kmcmAVSVVFAqsSGri3HmdzrKrGDx7lt3ozHq8MtBTas7JGPz9jzFcVrRt8xSpv3yLiUVUk5LykTtC3lk-KUqqYuacPY07zndVW2raQnxQvEG7rVSjwvToRsWkpVfVr8vE5udGklYSB7t9uXwxhuiTdoRhLu1h144jyxYZpNdBg8SSFX_gA-ueD_QGkP0cwr6Zfo_I4s8wyR7AymGJxPgMltMPg-oA2zs2SOwUKmAcni-wwj9GZzfiDnBFdMMOXSkggHB7fE-J5MkExpsmdFwJfFs8GMCK8e1rPi-vLT94sv5dW3z18vzq9KW1Uyld3AmexMLbvOcith4G0LA2V9VfO-43lawJlSFoRomWg63nRCmtYaRXvR8UqcFR-P3nnpJuht_ng0o56jm0xcdTBO_3vi3V7vwkErxSvWyix4-yCI4ceSJ6EnhxbG0XgIC2reNLWquaq2XvyI2hgQIwyPbRjVW-T6GLnOketfkevN_-bvBz5e-Z1xBsQRwHnLBqK-CUvMY8T_ae8B8Ey-0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775952944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Khanna, Puneet ; Haritha, Damarla ; Das, Aditi ; Sarkar, Soumya ; Roy, Avishek</creator><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Puneet ; Haritha, Damarla ; Das, Aditi ; Sarkar, Soumya ; Roy, Avishek</creatorcontrib><description>Background Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc. Methods An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis. Results We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48; I 2  = 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60; I 2  = 88%), better  nadir SpO 2 level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78; I 2  = 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93; I 2  = 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31, I 2  = 0%). Conclusion HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation. Clinical trial number and registry URL CRD42021245409 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409 ).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-8860</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36780095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Hypoxia - epidemiology ; Hypoxia - etiology ; Hypoxia - prevention &amp; control ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of gastroenterology, 2023-02, Vol.42 (1), p.53-63</ispartof><rights>Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.</rights><rights>Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0497-9909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Puneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haritha, Damarla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Aditi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Soumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Avishek</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><title>Indian journal of gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Background Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc. Methods An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis. Results We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48; I 2  = 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60; I 2  = 88%), better  nadir SpO 2 level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78; I 2  = 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93; I 2  = 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31, I 2  = 0%). Conclusion HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation. Clinical trial number and registry URL CRD42021245409 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409 ).</description><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives</subject><subject>Hypoxia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hypoxia - etiology</subject><subject>Hypoxia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</subject><issn>0254-8860</issn><issn>0975-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRiMEoqXwAiyQl2wC_kmcmAVSVVFAqsSGri3HmdzrKrGDx7lt3ozHq8MtBTas7JGPz9jzFcVrRt8xSpv3yLiUVUk5LykTtC3lk-KUqqYuacPY07zndVW2raQnxQvEG7rVSjwvToRsWkpVfVr8vE5udGklYSB7t9uXwxhuiTdoRhLu1h144jyxYZpNdBg8SSFX_gA-ueD_QGkP0cwr6Zfo_I4s8wyR7AymGJxPgMltMPg-oA2zs2SOwUKmAcni-wwj9GZzfiDnBFdMMOXSkggHB7fE-J5MkExpsmdFwJfFs8GMCK8e1rPi-vLT94sv5dW3z18vzq9KW1Uyld3AmexMLbvOcith4G0LA2V9VfO-43lawJlSFoRomWg63nRCmtYaRXvR8UqcFR-P3nnpJuht_ng0o56jm0xcdTBO_3vi3V7vwkErxSvWyix4-yCI4ceSJ6EnhxbG0XgIC2reNLWquaq2XvyI2hgQIwyPbRjVW-T6GLnOketfkevN_-bvBz5e-Z1xBsQRwHnLBqK-CUvMY8T_ae8B8Ey-0w</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Khanna, Puneet</creator><creator>Haritha, Damarla</creator><creator>Das, Aditi</creator><creator>Sarkar, Soumya</creator><creator>Roy, Avishek</creator><general>Springer India</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-9909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><author>Khanna, Puneet ; Haritha, Damarla ; Das, Aditi ; Sarkar, Soumya ; Roy, Avishek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives</topic><topic>Hypoxia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hypoxia - etiology</topic><topic>Hypoxia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Puneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haritha, Damarla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Aditi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Soumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Avishek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khanna, Puneet</au><au>Haritha, Damarla</au><au>Das, Aditi</au><au>Sarkar, Soumya</au><au>Roy, Avishek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of gastroenterology</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>53-63</pages><issn>0254-8860</issn><eissn>0975-0711</eissn><abstract>Background Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc. Methods An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis. Results We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48; I 2  = 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60; I 2  = 88%), better  nadir SpO 2 level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78; I 2  = 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93; I 2  = 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31, I 2  = 0%). Conclusion HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation. Clinical trial number and registry URL CRD42021245409 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409 ).</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>36780095</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-9909</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-8860
ispartof Indian journal of gastroenterology, 2023-02, Vol.42 (1), p.53-63
issn 0254-8860
0975-0711
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9924186
source Springer Nature
subjects Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Gastroenterology
Hepatology
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Hypoxia - epidemiology
Hypoxia - etiology
Hypoxia - prevention & control
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original
Original Article
Oxygen
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods
title Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20high-flow%20nasal%20oxygen%20in%20comparison%20to%20conventional%20oxygen%20therapy%20during%20upper%20gastrointestinal%20endoscopic%20procedures%20under%20sedation:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analyses&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Khanna,%20Puneet&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=53-63&rft.issn=0254-8860&rft.eissn=0975-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2775952944%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775952944&rft_id=info:pmid/36780095&rfr_iscdi=true