Loading…
Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses
Background Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of gastroenterology 2023-02, Vol.42 (1), p.53-63 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243 |
container_end_page | 63 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Indian journal of gastroenterology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Khanna, Puneet Haritha, Damarla Das, Aditi Sarkar, Soumya Roy, Avishek |
description | Background
Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc.
Methods
An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis.
Results
We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48;
I
2
= 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60;
I
2
= 88%), better
nadir
SpO
2
level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78;
I
2
= 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93;
I
2
= 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31,
I
2
= 0%).
Conclusion
HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation.
Clinical trial number and registry URL
CRD42021245409 (
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409
). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9924186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2775952944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRiMEoqXwAiyQl2wC_kmcmAVSVVFAqsSGri3HmdzrKrGDx7lt3ozHq8MtBTas7JGPz9jzFcVrRt8xSpv3yLiUVUk5LykTtC3lk-KUqqYuacPY07zndVW2raQnxQvEG7rVSjwvToRsWkpVfVr8vE5udGklYSB7t9uXwxhuiTdoRhLu1h144jyxYZpNdBg8SSFX_gA-ueD_QGkP0cwr6Zfo_I4s8wyR7AymGJxPgMltMPg-oA2zs2SOwUKmAcni-wwj9GZzfiDnBFdMMOXSkggHB7fE-J5MkExpsmdFwJfFs8GMCK8e1rPi-vLT94sv5dW3z18vzq9KW1Uyld3AmexMLbvOcith4G0LA2V9VfO-43lawJlSFoRomWg63nRCmtYaRXvR8UqcFR-P3nnpJuht_ng0o56jm0xcdTBO_3vi3V7vwkErxSvWyix4-yCI4ceSJ6EnhxbG0XgIC2reNLWquaq2XvyI2hgQIwyPbRjVW-T6GLnOketfkevN_-bvBz5e-Z1xBsQRwHnLBqK-CUvMY8T_ae8B8Ey-0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775952944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Khanna, Puneet ; Haritha, Damarla ; Das, Aditi ; Sarkar, Soumya ; Roy, Avishek</creator><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Puneet ; Haritha, Damarla ; Das, Aditi ; Sarkar, Soumya ; Roy, Avishek</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc.
Methods
An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis.
Results
We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48;
I
2
= 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60;
I
2
= 88%), better
nadir
SpO
2
level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78;
I
2
= 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93;
I
2
= 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31,
I
2
= 0%).
Conclusion
HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation.
Clinical trial number and registry URL
CRD42021245409 (
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409
).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-8860</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36780095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Hypoxia - epidemiology ; Hypoxia - etiology ; Hypoxia - prevention & control ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of gastroenterology, 2023-02, Vol.42 (1), p.53-63</ispartof><rights>Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.</rights><rights>Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0497-9909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Puneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haritha, Damarla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Aditi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Soumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Avishek</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><title>Indian journal of gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Background
Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc.
Methods
An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis.
Results
We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48;
I
2
= 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60;
I
2
= 88%), better
nadir
SpO
2
level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78;
I
2
= 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93;
I
2
= 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31,
I
2
= 0%).
Conclusion
HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation.
Clinical trial number and registry URL
CRD42021245409 (
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409
).</description><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives</subject><subject>Hypoxia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hypoxia - etiology</subject><subject>Hypoxia - prevention & control</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</subject><issn>0254-8860</issn><issn>0975-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRiMEoqXwAiyQl2wC_kmcmAVSVVFAqsSGri3HmdzrKrGDx7lt3ozHq8MtBTas7JGPz9jzFcVrRt8xSpv3yLiUVUk5LykTtC3lk-KUqqYuacPY07zndVW2raQnxQvEG7rVSjwvToRsWkpVfVr8vE5udGklYSB7t9uXwxhuiTdoRhLu1h144jyxYZpNdBg8SSFX_gA-ueD_QGkP0cwr6Zfo_I4s8wyR7AymGJxPgMltMPg-oA2zs2SOwUKmAcni-wwj9GZzfiDnBFdMMOXSkggHB7fE-J5MkExpsmdFwJfFs8GMCK8e1rPi-vLT94sv5dW3z18vzq9KW1Uyld3AmexMLbvOcith4G0LA2V9VfO-43lawJlSFoRomWg63nRCmtYaRXvR8UqcFR-P3nnpJuht_ng0o56jm0xcdTBO_3vi3V7vwkErxSvWyix4-yCI4ceSJ6EnhxbG0XgIC2reNLWquaq2XvyI2hgQIwyPbRjVW-T6GLnOketfkevN_-bvBz5e-Z1xBsQRwHnLBqK-CUvMY8T_ae8B8Ey-0w</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Khanna, Puneet</creator><creator>Haritha, Damarla</creator><creator>Das, Aditi</creator><creator>Sarkar, Soumya</creator><creator>Roy, Avishek</creator><general>Springer India</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-9909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><author>Khanna, Puneet ; Haritha, Damarla ; Das, Aditi ; Sarkar, Soumya ; Roy, Avishek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives</topic><topic>Hypoxia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hypoxia - etiology</topic><topic>Hypoxia - prevention & control</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Puneet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haritha, Damarla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Aditi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Soumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Avishek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khanna, Puneet</au><au>Haritha, Damarla</au><au>Das, Aditi</au><au>Sarkar, Soumya</au><au>Roy, Avishek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of gastroenterology</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>53-63</pages><issn>0254-8860</issn><eissn>0975-0711</eissn><abstract>Background
Sedation and analgesia are the integral components of modern-day upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Irrespective of the sedative agent, hypoxia is the most commonly encountered unwarranted event with sedation. The current study intends to scrutinize whether high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during upper GI endoscopic procedures over other conventional low-flow oxygen delivery modalities, e.g. nasal cannula, facemask, etc.
Methods
An extensive screening of electronic databases was done till July 31, 2022, after enlisting in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021245409). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparative cohort studies, case series, cross-sectional studies and case–control studies evaluating the utility of HFNO during upper GI endoscopy under sedation were included in this meta-analysis.
Results
We retrieved eight randomized control studies and one longitudinal study with 3294 patients. The application of HFNO during endoscopy led to lesser incidence of desaturation spells (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48;
I
2
= 71%), reduced procedural interruption (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02–0.60;
I
2
= 88%), better
nadir
SpO
2
level during procedure (mean difference [MD] = 3.16; 95% CI 0.54–5.78;
I
2
= 73%), overall lesser incidence of sedation-related adverse events (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.42–0.93;
I
2
= 25%), with no significant impact on the duration of endoscopy (MD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.31,
I
2
= 0%).
Conclusion
HFNO is a novel option for upper GI endoscopy under sedation.
Clinical trial number and registry URL
CRD42021245409 (
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245409
).</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>36780095</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-9909</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0254-8860 |
ispartof | Indian journal of gastroenterology, 2023-02, Vol.42 (1), p.53-63 |
issn | 0254-8860 0975-0711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9924186 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Gastroenterology Hepatology Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives Hypoxia - epidemiology Hypoxia - etiology Hypoxia - prevention & control Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Original Article Oxygen Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - adverse effects Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods |
title | Utility of high-flow nasal oxygen in comparison to conventional oxygen therapy during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation: A systematic review and meta-analyses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20high-flow%20nasal%20oxygen%20in%20comparison%20to%20conventional%20oxygen%20therapy%20during%20upper%20gastrointestinal%20endoscopic%20procedures%20under%20sedation:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analyses&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Khanna,%20Puneet&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=53-63&rft.issn=0254-8860&rft.eissn=0975-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12664-022-01308-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2775952944%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-bf216ba56bbc2c6ef288ef01d452db2097e2199ce338137b27b36a8ca90d3b243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775952944&rft_id=info:pmid/36780095&rfr_iscdi=true |