Loading…
Achieving Successful Extubation and Cost-Effective Recovery Following Anesthetic Airway Management in Supracarinal Tracheal Reconstruction Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis
Introduction From an anesthesiologist's perspective, perioperative concerns related to supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgery include having uninterrupted smooth ventilation without any laryngeal edema, glottic dysfunction, and airway leak. Surgical concerns comprise various kinds of anas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e34225-e34225 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8b15a1e4e86f327545e66f819f09f2135246158a6b649a8fed6d21e6cff7e7923 |
container_end_page | e34225 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e34225 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada Gnp, Pateel P, Subramanya Rao Ms, Babu Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai |
description | Introduction From an anesthesiologist's perspective, perioperative concerns related to supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgery include having uninterrupted smooth ventilation without any laryngeal edema, glottic dysfunction, and airway leak. Surgical concerns comprise various kinds of anastomotic dissections, fistulas to innominate arteries, and the esophagus. The most serious complication following tracheal surgery is anastomotic separation, which might manifest modestly as stridor, respiratory distress, and extremis. To avoid dire repercussions, prompt management and securing the airway are necessary. Against this background, we wanted to highlight the importance of early extubation and discharge of supracarinal tracheal reconstruction patients from hospitals without any postoperative complications and with the least expenses possible, since most of these patients have already undergone postintubation tracheal stenosis and prolonged intensive care unit stay, and have experienced significant financial burden incurring from preceding events. Methodology Medical records of all patients admitted for tracheal reconstruction during the period from March 2019 to April 2022 (four years) were reviewed to collect patient demographic details, surgical descriptions, anesthesia data, records of pre-anesthetic evaluations, and postoperative details up until the hospital discharge. Results The most common reason for tracheal stenosis among our patients was post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS), which was seen in 8/13 patients (61.53%); 4/13 patients (30.76%) had stridor at rest and underwent emergency tracheostomy preoperatively immediately following admission to the hospital. The stenosis was situated at a median distance of 3 cm [interquartile range (IQR): 0.5-7] from the true vocal cords or 7 cm (IQR: 3-9) from the carina. The median length of tracheal resection was 2 cm (IQR: 1-4). We observed that the mode of induction for airway management was tracheostomy tube in four patients (with 90% tracheal stenosis), placement of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with spontaneous ventilation in four patients (with 75% tracheal stenosis), and small-size (#5-7.5 sizes) endotracheal tube (ETT) placement in five patients (with less than 75% tracheal stenosis). The postoperative complication noted was bleeding from the operative site in 1/13 patients (7.6%); a 0% mortality rate was noted during the hospital stay and up until six months post-discharge. We noted that the median |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.34225 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9960377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2780653160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8b15a1e4e86f327545e66f819f09f2135246158a6b649a8fed6d21e6cff7e7923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSG2dkiQuHpvhj1_ZyQFpFKSAVIdFythxnnLja2MEfKflT_EacJlSFk0eaZ96ZdzxN85rgSyG6_r0pEUq6ZC2l3bPmlBIuJ5LI9vmT-KQ5T-kOY0ywoFjgl80J47KjjIvT5vdgVg62zi_RTTEGUrJlRLNfucx1dsEj7RdoGlKezKwFk90W0HcwYQtxh67COIb7fe3gIeUVZGfQ4OK93qGv2uslrMFn5HzV3kRtdHRej-i2hiuowV7IpxyLeWh1U-ISooP0AQ01l2NIm2PLodbtkkuvmhdWjwnOj-9Z8-Nqdjv9PLn-9unLdLieGNr3eSLnpNMEWpDcMiq6tgPOrSS9xb2lhHW05aSTms9522tpYcEXlAA31goQPWVnzceD7qbM17Aw1UbUo9pEt9Zxp4J26t-Mdyu1DFvV9xwzIarAu6NADD9LXY5au2RgHLWHUJKiQmLBOWe4om__Q-9CidXwgeIdI3xPXRwoU9eSItjHYQhW-1tQh1tQD7dQ8TdPDTzCf3-e_QEGaLWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2780653160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Achieving Successful Extubation and Cost-Effective Recovery Following Anesthetic Airway Management in Supracarinal Tracheal Reconstruction Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada ; Gnp, Pateel ; P, Subramanya Rao ; Ms, Babu ; Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada ; Gnp, Pateel ; P, Subramanya Rao ; Ms, Babu ; Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction From an anesthesiologist's perspective, perioperative concerns related to supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgery include having uninterrupted smooth ventilation without any laryngeal edema, glottic dysfunction, and airway leak. Surgical concerns comprise various kinds of anastomotic dissections, fistulas to innominate arteries, and the esophagus. The most serious complication following tracheal surgery is anastomotic separation, which might manifest modestly as stridor, respiratory distress, and extremis. To avoid dire repercussions, prompt management and securing the airway are necessary. Against this background, we wanted to highlight the importance of early extubation and discharge of supracarinal tracheal reconstruction patients from hospitals without any postoperative complications and with the least expenses possible, since most of these patients have already undergone postintubation tracheal stenosis and prolonged intensive care unit stay, and have experienced significant financial burden incurring from preceding events. Methodology Medical records of all patients admitted for tracheal reconstruction during the period from March 2019 to April 2022 (four years) were reviewed to collect patient demographic details, surgical descriptions, anesthesia data, records of pre-anesthetic evaluations, and postoperative details up until the hospital discharge. Results The most common reason for tracheal stenosis among our patients was post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS), which was seen in 8/13 patients (61.53%); 4/13 patients (30.76%) had stridor at rest and underwent emergency tracheostomy preoperatively immediately following admission to the hospital. The stenosis was situated at a median distance of 3 cm [interquartile range (IQR): 0.5-7] from the true vocal cords or 7 cm (IQR: 3-9) from the carina. The median length of tracheal resection was 2 cm (IQR: 1-4). We observed that the mode of induction for airway management was tracheostomy tube in four patients (with 90% tracheal stenosis), placement of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with spontaneous ventilation in four patients (with 75% tracheal stenosis), and small-size (#5-7.5 sizes) endotracheal tube (ETT) placement in five patients (with less than 75% tracheal stenosis). The postoperative complication noted was bleeding from the operative site in 1/13 patients (7.6%); a 0% mortality rate was noted during the hospital stay and up until six months post-discharge. We noted that the median duration of postoperative hospitalization was five days (IQR: 2-15), and the total cost incurred by each patient was less than INR 85,000 (USD 1,000). Conclusion Our analysis revealed that all our patients were extubated in the operative room and shifted to the ward. In the "open airway phase", standard distal tracheal intubation and cross-field ventilation techniques, and tracheal suturing were facilitated by the apnoea-ventilation-apnoea technique. Both the techniques along with the emergency tracheostomies done in severe tracheal obstruction preoperatively and intraoperative anesthesia management with the insertion of LMA Supreme, maintained with spontaneous breathing techniques, offered potential advantages in the management of supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgeries. The multidisciplinary teamwork along with close communication and good rapport with the surgical team was found to be the key factor in the fast-track extubation and recovery of these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34225</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36852367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Anesthesiology ; Bronchoscopy ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Extubation ; General anesthesia ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Intubation ; Oncology ; Ostomy ; Otolaryngology ; Oxygen saturation ; Patients ; Postoperative period ; Recovery (Medical) ; Surgery ; Tracheotomy ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e34225-e34225</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Mulakaluri et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Mulakaluri et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Mulakaluri et al. 2023 Mulakaluri et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8b15a1e4e86f327545e66f819f09f2135246158a6b649a8fed6d21e6cff7e7923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2780653160?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2780653160?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,38515,43894,44589,53790,53792,74183,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnp, Pateel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Subramanya Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ms, Babu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai</creatorcontrib><title>Achieving Successful Extubation and Cost-Effective Recovery Following Anesthetic Airway Management in Supracarinal Tracheal Reconstruction Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Introduction From an anesthesiologist's perspective, perioperative concerns related to supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgery include having uninterrupted smooth ventilation without any laryngeal edema, glottic dysfunction, and airway leak. Surgical concerns comprise various kinds of anastomotic dissections, fistulas to innominate arteries, and the esophagus. The most serious complication following tracheal surgery is anastomotic separation, which might manifest modestly as stridor, respiratory distress, and extremis. To avoid dire repercussions, prompt management and securing the airway are necessary. Against this background, we wanted to highlight the importance of early extubation and discharge of supracarinal tracheal reconstruction patients from hospitals without any postoperative complications and with the least expenses possible, since most of these patients have already undergone postintubation tracheal stenosis and prolonged intensive care unit stay, and have experienced significant financial burden incurring from preceding events. Methodology Medical records of all patients admitted for tracheal reconstruction during the period from March 2019 to April 2022 (four years) were reviewed to collect patient demographic details, surgical descriptions, anesthesia data, records of pre-anesthetic evaluations, and postoperative details up until the hospital discharge. Results The most common reason for tracheal stenosis among our patients was post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS), which was seen in 8/13 patients (61.53%); 4/13 patients (30.76%) had stridor at rest and underwent emergency tracheostomy preoperatively immediately following admission to the hospital. The stenosis was situated at a median distance of 3 cm [interquartile range (IQR): 0.5-7] from the true vocal cords or 7 cm (IQR: 3-9) from the carina. The median length of tracheal resection was 2 cm (IQR: 1-4). We observed that the mode of induction for airway management was tracheostomy tube in four patients (with 90% tracheal stenosis), placement of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with spontaneous ventilation in four patients (with 75% tracheal stenosis), and small-size (#5-7.5 sizes) endotracheal tube (ETT) placement in five patients (with less than 75% tracheal stenosis). The postoperative complication noted was bleeding from the operative site in 1/13 patients (7.6%); a 0% mortality rate was noted during the hospital stay and up until six months post-discharge. We noted that the median duration of postoperative hospitalization was five days (IQR: 2-15), and the total cost incurred by each patient was less than INR 85,000 (USD 1,000). Conclusion Our analysis revealed that all our patients were extubated in the operative room and shifted to the ward. In the "open airway phase", standard distal tracheal intubation and cross-field ventilation techniques, and tracheal suturing were facilitated by the apnoea-ventilation-apnoea technique. Both the techniques along with the emergency tracheostomies done in severe tracheal obstruction preoperatively and intraoperative anesthesia management with the insertion of LMA Supreme, maintained with spontaneous breathing techniques, offered potential advantages in the management of supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgeries. The multidisciplinary teamwork along with close communication and good rapport with the surgical team was found to be the key factor in the fast-track extubation and recovery of these patients.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Bronchoscopy</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Extubation</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Oxygen saturation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tracheotomy</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSG2dkiQuHpvhj1_ZyQFpFKSAVIdFythxnnLja2MEfKflT_EacJlSFk0eaZ96ZdzxN85rgSyG6_r0pEUq6ZC2l3bPmlBIuJ5LI9vmT-KQ5T-kOY0ywoFjgl80J47KjjIvT5vdgVg62zi_RTTEGUrJlRLNfucx1dsEj7RdoGlKezKwFk90W0HcwYQtxh67COIb7fe3gIeUVZGfQ4OK93qGv2uslrMFn5HzV3kRtdHRej-i2hiuowV7IpxyLeWh1U-ISooP0AQ01l2NIm2PLodbtkkuvmhdWjwnOj-9Z8-Nqdjv9PLn-9unLdLieGNr3eSLnpNMEWpDcMiq6tgPOrSS9xb2lhHW05aSTms9522tpYcEXlAA31goQPWVnzceD7qbM17Aw1UbUo9pEt9Zxp4J26t-Mdyu1DFvV9xwzIarAu6NADD9LXY5au2RgHLWHUJKiQmLBOWe4om__Q-9CidXwgeIdI3xPXRwoU9eSItjHYQhW-1tQh1tQD7dQ8TdPDTzCf3-e_QEGaLWU</recordid><startdate>20230126</startdate><enddate>20230126</enddate><creator>Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada</creator><creator>Gnp, Pateel</creator><creator>P, Subramanya Rao</creator><creator>Ms, Babu</creator><creator>Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230126</creationdate><title>Achieving Successful Extubation and Cost-Effective Recovery Following Anesthetic Airway Management in Supracarinal Tracheal Reconstruction Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis</title><author>Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada ; Gnp, Pateel ; P, Subramanya Rao ; Ms, Babu ; Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8b15a1e4e86f327545e66f819f09f2135246158a6b649a8fed6d21e6cff7e7923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Bronchoscopy</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Extubation</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Oxygen saturation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tracheotomy</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnp, Pateel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Subramanya Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ms, Babu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulakaluri, Amuktamalyada</au><au>Gnp, Pateel</au><au>P, Subramanya Rao</au><au>Ms, Babu</au><au>Nanjunda Rao, Rathna Bai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Achieving Successful Extubation and Cost-Effective Recovery Following Anesthetic Airway Management in Supracarinal Tracheal Reconstruction Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2023-01-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e34225</spage><epage>e34225</epage><pages>e34225-e34225</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction From an anesthesiologist's perspective, perioperative concerns related to supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgery include having uninterrupted smooth ventilation without any laryngeal edema, glottic dysfunction, and airway leak. Surgical concerns comprise various kinds of anastomotic dissections, fistulas to innominate arteries, and the esophagus. The most serious complication following tracheal surgery is anastomotic separation, which might manifest modestly as stridor, respiratory distress, and extremis. To avoid dire repercussions, prompt management and securing the airway are necessary. Against this background, we wanted to highlight the importance of early extubation and discharge of supracarinal tracheal reconstruction patients from hospitals without any postoperative complications and with the least expenses possible, since most of these patients have already undergone postintubation tracheal stenosis and prolonged intensive care unit stay, and have experienced significant financial burden incurring from preceding events. Methodology Medical records of all patients admitted for tracheal reconstruction during the period from March 2019 to April 2022 (four years) were reviewed to collect patient demographic details, surgical descriptions, anesthesia data, records of pre-anesthetic evaluations, and postoperative details up until the hospital discharge. Results The most common reason for tracheal stenosis among our patients was post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS), which was seen in 8/13 patients (61.53%); 4/13 patients (30.76%) had stridor at rest and underwent emergency tracheostomy preoperatively immediately following admission to the hospital. The stenosis was situated at a median distance of 3 cm [interquartile range (IQR): 0.5-7] from the true vocal cords or 7 cm (IQR: 3-9) from the carina. The median length of tracheal resection was 2 cm (IQR: 1-4). We observed that the mode of induction for airway management was tracheostomy tube in four patients (with 90% tracheal stenosis), placement of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with spontaneous ventilation in four patients (with 75% tracheal stenosis), and small-size (#5-7.5 sizes) endotracheal tube (ETT) placement in five patients (with less than 75% tracheal stenosis). The postoperative complication noted was bleeding from the operative site in 1/13 patients (7.6%); a 0% mortality rate was noted during the hospital stay and up until six months post-discharge. We noted that the median duration of postoperative hospitalization was five days (IQR: 2-15), and the total cost incurred by each patient was less than INR 85,000 (USD 1,000). Conclusion Our analysis revealed that all our patients were extubated in the operative room and shifted to the ward. In the "open airway phase", standard distal tracheal intubation and cross-field ventilation techniques, and tracheal suturing were facilitated by the apnoea-ventilation-apnoea technique. Both the techniques along with the emergency tracheostomies done in severe tracheal obstruction preoperatively and intraoperative anesthesia management with the insertion of LMA Supreme, maintained with spontaneous breathing techniques, offered potential advantages in the management of supracarinal tracheal reconstruction surgeries. The multidisciplinary teamwork along with close communication and good rapport with the surgical team was found to be the key factor in the fast-track extubation and recovery of these patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36852367</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.34225</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e34225-e34225 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9960377 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Airway management Anesthesiology Bronchoscopy Coronaviruses COVID-19 Extubation General anesthesia Hospitalization Hospitals Intubation Oncology Ostomy Otolaryngology Oxygen saturation Patients Postoperative period Recovery (Medical) Surgery Tracheotomy Ventilators |
title | Achieving Successful Extubation and Cost-Effective Recovery Following Anesthetic Airway Management in Supracarinal Tracheal Reconstruction Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A01%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Achieving%20Successful%20Extubation%20and%20Cost-Effective%20Recovery%20Following%20Anesthetic%20Airway%20Management%20in%20Supracarinal%20Tracheal%20Reconstruction%20Surgeries:%20A%20Retrospective%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Mulakaluri,%20Amuktamalyada&rft.date=2023-01-26&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e34225&rft.epage=e34225&rft.pages=e34225-e34225&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.34225&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2780653160%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8b15a1e4e86f327545e66f819f09f2135246158a6b649a8fed6d21e6cff7e7923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2780653160&rft_id=info:pmid/36852367&rfr_iscdi=true |