A Submaximal Field Test of Aerobic Capacity does not Accurately Reflect VO2max in Career Firefighters

Adequate aerobic capacity is crucial to maintaining firefighter safety. The purpose of this study was to compare predicted VO2max scores from a submaximal and maximal step test. Eighteen career male firefighters from a medium sized urban municipality completed both a submaximal Forestry step test an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of exercise science 2022-01, Vol.15 (4), p.221-230
Main Authors: Hale, Davis, Kollock, Roger O, Thomas, Jacob, Sanders, Gabriel J, Peveler, Will, Mangan, Andrew, Landon, Blake
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Firefighters
Original Research
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Adequate aerobic capacity is crucial to maintaining firefighter safety. The purpose of this study was to compare predicted VO2max scores from a submaximal and maximal step test. Eighteen career male firefighters from a medium sized urban municipality completed both a submaximal Forestry step test and a maximal laboratory WFI step test. A lack of association (p = .017) and low level of agreement (p = .015) was determined between step test protocols producing a mean bias of ± 5.61 mL.kg-1/min-1 with most scores being overestimated. Use of the Forestry step test to predict true VO2max in firefighters should be used with caution when classifying firefighter fitness.
ISSN:1939-795X
1939-795X
DOI:10.70252/YLQD4760