Loading…

Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones

The management policy of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is based on a one- or two-stage procedure. It basically includes either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration (LCBDE) in the same operation or LC with preoperative, postoperat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.169-176
Main Authors: Pavlidis, Efstathios T, Pavlidis, Theodoros E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e4beaf3a5ea49525c3be2a118127e975a56282d1b43947f0497b8d2d6f2afa5b3
container_end_page 176
container_issue 2
container_start_page 169
container_title World journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 15
creator Pavlidis, Efstathios T
Pavlidis, Theodoros E
description The management policy of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is based on a one- or two-stage procedure. It basically includes either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration (LCBDE) in the same operation or LC with preoperative, postoperative and even intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES) for stone clearance. The most frequently used worldwide option is preoperative ERCP-ES and stone removal followed by LC, preferably on the next day. In cases where preoperative ERCP-ES is not feasible, the proposed alternative of intraoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES simultaneously with LC has been advocated. The intraoperative extraction of CBD stones is superior to postoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of laparoendoscopic rendezvous. This is equivalent to a traditional two-stage procedure. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation reduces recurrence. LCBDE and intraoperative ERCP have similar good outcomes. The risk of recurrence after ERCP-ES is greater than that after LCBDE. Laparoscopic ultrasonography may delineate the anatomy and detect CBD stones. The majority of surgeons prefer the transcductal instead of the transcystic approach for CBDE with or without T-tube drainage, but the transcystic approach must be used where possible. LCBDE is a safe and effective choice when performed by an experienced surgeon. However, the requirement of specific equipment and advanced training are drawbacks. The percutaneous approach is an alternative when ERCP fails. Surgical or endoscopic reintervention for retained stones may be needed. For asymptomatic CBD stones, ERCP clearance is the first-choice method. Both one-stage and two-stage management are acceptable and can ensure improved quality of life.
doi_str_mv 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.169
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9988640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2786099567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e4beaf3a5ea49525c3be2a118127e975a56282d1b43947f0497b8d2d6f2afa5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1PwzAMjRCITWNnbqhHLt2SNE2TCxKa-JImcYFz5KbplqlNRtMO8e_JtDENX2zrPT9bfgjdEjxjlOH592YVZjuSzyydES4v0JhIJlKZcX55Vo_QNIQNjsEYlxJfo1HGheQZwWO0XAxdZ1yftOBgZdp96etEe6d9a3uIrV77xjS2X1sINiTgqgi3rXdJaRuTVIPuk9B7Z8INuqqhCWZ6zBP0-fz0sXhNl-8vb4vHZappUfSpYaWBOoPcAJM5zXVWGgqECEILI4scck4FrUjJMsmKGjNZlKKiFa8p1JCX2QQ9HHS3Q9maSsejO2jUtrMtdD_Kg1X_EWfXauV3SkohOMNR4P4o0PmvwYRetTZo0zTgjB-CooXgWMqcF5E6P1B150PoTH1aQ7Da26D2Nqhog7JURRvixN35dSf-39OzX1D0hyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786099567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Pavlidis, Efstathios T ; Pavlidis, Theodoros E</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavlidis, Efstathios T ; Pavlidis, Theodoros E</creatorcontrib><description>The management policy of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is based on a one- or two-stage procedure. It basically includes either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration (LCBDE) in the same operation or LC with preoperative, postoperative and even intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES) for stone clearance. The most frequently used worldwide option is preoperative ERCP-ES and stone removal followed by LC, preferably on the next day. In cases where preoperative ERCP-ES is not feasible, the proposed alternative of intraoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES simultaneously with LC has been advocated. The intraoperative extraction of CBD stones is superior to postoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of laparoendoscopic rendezvous. This is equivalent to a traditional two-stage procedure. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation reduces recurrence. LCBDE and intraoperative ERCP have similar good outcomes. The risk of recurrence after ERCP-ES is greater than that after LCBDE. Laparoscopic ultrasonography may delineate the anatomy and detect CBD stones. The majority of surgeons prefer the transcductal instead of the transcystic approach for CBDE with or without T-tube drainage, but the transcystic approach must be used where possible. LCBDE is a safe and effective choice when performed by an experienced surgeon. However, the requirement of specific equipment and advanced training are drawbacks. The percutaneous approach is an alternative when ERCP fails. Surgical or endoscopic reintervention for retained stones may be needed. For asymptomatic CBD stones, ERCP clearance is the first-choice method. Both one-stage and two-stage management are acceptable and can ensure improved quality of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1948-9366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-9366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36896310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Minireviews</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.169-176</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2023</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e4beaf3a5ea49525c3be2a118127e975a56282d1b43947f0497b8d2d6f2afa5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988640/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988640/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavlidis, Efstathios T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlidis, Theodoros E</creatorcontrib><title>Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones</title><title>World journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>World J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>The management policy of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is based on a one- or two-stage procedure. It basically includes either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration (LCBDE) in the same operation or LC with preoperative, postoperative and even intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES) for stone clearance. The most frequently used worldwide option is preoperative ERCP-ES and stone removal followed by LC, preferably on the next day. In cases where preoperative ERCP-ES is not feasible, the proposed alternative of intraoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES simultaneously with LC has been advocated. The intraoperative extraction of CBD stones is superior to postoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of laparoendoscopic rendezvous. This is equivalent to a traditional two-stage procedure. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation reduces recurrence. LCBDE and intraoperative ERCP have similar good outcomes. The risk of recurrence after ERCP-ES is greater than that after LCBDE. Laparoscopic ultrasonography may delineate the anatomy and detect CBD stones. The majority of surgeons prefer the transcductal instead of the transcystic approach for CBDE with or without T-tube drainage, but the transcystic approach must be used where possible. LCBDE is a safe and effective choice when performed by an experienced surgeon. However, the requirement of specific equipment and advanced training are drawbacks. The percutaneous approach is an alternative when ERCP fails. Surgical or endoscopic reintervention for retained stones may be needed. For asymptomatic CBD stones, ERCP clearance is the first-choice method. Both one-stage and two-stage management are acceptable and can ensure improved quality of life.</description><subject>Minireviews</subject><issn>1948-9366</issn><issn>1948-9366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1PwzAMjRCITWNnbqhHLt2SNE2TCxKa-JImcYFz5KbplqlNRtMO8e_JtDENX2zrPT9bfgjdEjxjlOH592YVZjuSzyydES4v0JhIJlKZcX55Vo_QNIQNjsEYlxJfo1HGheQZwWO0XAxdZ1yftOBgZdp96etEe6d9a3uIrV77xjS2X1sINiTgqgi3rXdJaRuTVIPuk9B7Z8INuqqhCWZ6zBP0-fz0sXhNl-8vb4vHZappUfSpYaWBOoPcAJM5zXVWGgqECEILI4scck4FrUjJMsmKGjNZlKKiFa8p1JCX2QQ9HHS3Q9maSsejO2jUtrMtdD_Kg1X_EWfXauV3SkohOMNR4P4o0PmvwYRetTZo0zTgjB-CooXgWMqcF5E6P1B150PoTH1aQ7Da26D2Nqhog7JURRvixN35dSf-39OzX1D0hyo</recordid><startdate>20230227</startdate><enddate>20230227</enddate><creator>Pavlidis, Efstathios T</creator><creator>Pavlidis, Theodoros E</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230227</creationdate><title>Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones</title><author>Pavlidis, Efstathios T ; Pavlidis, Theodoros E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e4beaf3a5ea49525c3be2a118127e975a56282d1b43947f0497b8d2d6f2afa5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Minireviews</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavlidis, Efstathios T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlidis, Theodoros E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavlidis, Efstathios T</au><au>Pavlidis, Theodoros E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>World J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2023-02-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>169-176</pages><issn>1948-9366</issn><eissn>1948-9366</eissn><abstract>The management policy of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is based on a one- or two-stage procedure. It basically includes either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration (LCBDE) in the same operation or LC with preoperative, postoperative and even intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES) for stone clearance. The most frequently used worldwide option is preoperative ERCP-ES and stone removal followed by LC, preferably on the next day. In cases where preoperative ERCP-ES is not feasible, the proposed alternative of intraoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES simultaneously with LC has been advocated. The intraoperative extraction of CBD stones is superior to postoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of laparoendoscopic rendezvous. This is equivalent to a traditional two-stage procedure. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation reduces recurrence. LCBDE and intraoperative ERCP have similar good outcomes. The risk of recurrence after ERCP-ES is greater than that after LCBDE. Laparoscopic ultrasonography may delineate the anatomy and detect CBD stones. The majority of surgeons prefer the transcductal instead of the transcystic approach for CBDE with or without T-tube drainage, but the transcystic approach must be used where possible. LCBDE is a safe and effective choice when performed by an experienced surgeon. However, the requirement of specific equipment and advanced training are drawbacks. The percutaneous approach is an alternative when ERCP fails. Surgical or endoscopic reintervention for retained stones may be needed. For asymptomatic CBD stones, ERCP clearance is the first-choice method. Both one-stage and two-stage management are acceptable and can ensure improved quality of life.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>36896310</pmid><doi>10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.169</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1948-9366
ispartof World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.169-176
issn 1948-9366
1948-9366
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9988640
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Minireviews
title Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A12%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20management%20of%20concomitant%20cholelithiasis%20and%20common%20bile%20duct%20stones&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Pavlidis,%20Efstathios%20T&rft.date=2023-02-27&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=169-176&rft.issn=1948-9366&rft.eissn=1948-9366&rft_id=info:doi/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2786099567%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e4beaf3a5ea49525c3be2a118127e975a56282d1b43947f0497b8d2d6f2afa5b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786099567&rft_id=info:pmid/36896310&rfr_iscdi=true