Loading…

The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: The points of view of European rural general practitioners

Introduction: This article describes the views of European rural general practitioners regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the implementation of a chronic care model (CCM) in European rural primary care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods online survey. Data were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rural and remote health 2021-12, Vol.21 (4), p.1-13
Main Authors: Donata Kurpas, Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Katarzyna Szwamel, Jane Randall-Smith, Beata Blahova, Gindrovel Dumitra, Katerina Javorska, Andras Mohos, Jose Augusto Simoes, Victoria Tkachenko, Jean-Baptiste Kern, Carol Holland, Holly Gwyther
Format: Article
Language:
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 13
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Rural and remote health
container_volume 21
creator Donata Kurpas
Ferdinando Petrazzuoli
Katarzyna Szwamel
Jane Randall-Smith
Beata Blahova
Gindrovel Dumitra
Katerina Javorska
Andras Mohos
Jose Augusto Simoes
Victoria Tkachenko
Jean-Baptiste Kern
Carol Holland
Holly Gwyther
description Introduction: This article describes the views of European rural general practitioners regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the implementation of a chronic care model (CCM) in European rural primary care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods online survey. Data were collected from 227 general practitioners between May and December 2017. Categorical data were analysed using descriptive methods while free-text responses were analysed using qualitative methods. The setting was rural primary care in nine European countries (including Central and Eastern Europe). Main outcomes measures were respondents' evaluations of a chronic care model in their rural healthcare settings in terms of SWOT. Results: The SWOT analysis showed that the expertise of healthcare professionals and the strength of relationships and communications between professionals, caregivers and patients are positive components of the CCM system. However, ensuring adequate staffing levels and staff competency are issues that would need to be addressed. Opportunities included the need to enable patients to participate in decision making by ensuring adequate health literacy. Conclusion: The CCM could certainly have benefits for health care in rural settings but staffing levels and staff competency would need to be addressed before implementation of CCM in such settings. Improving health literacy among patients and their carers will be essential to ensure their full participation in the implementation of a successful CCM.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rmit</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_298736760619038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.298736760619038</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/informit.298736760619038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_2987367606190383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljUFOwzAQRS1EJQrlDnOBSk6cOilih4o4QPfRyJ3QqexxZLsgrsJpaQILxJbVH329_-ZKLaum2ayt2TTXv-4bdZvzSeu61V29VJ_7I8GYYgaUA7goGeIA5VJyGD0FkoKFo0wtgjumKOzAYSII8UAeWGB3TnEkFEjnhP5i44DpY4YeYPZHljKL35jep_wzeSWh7ym6wtM_SnmlFgP6TPc_eacen3f7p5d1Clx6F70nN6H5hCX3le6NqWzPMsQZqLdda2xrta222nTmn_MvSGFrWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: The points of view of European rural general practitioners</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Donata Kurpas ; Ferdinando Petrazzuoli ; Katarzyna Szwamel ; Jane Randall-Smith ; Beata Blahova ; Gindrovel Dumitra ; Katerina Javorska ; Andras Mohos ; Jose Augusto Simoes ; Victoria Tkachenko ; Jean-Baptiste Kern ; Carol Holland ; Holly Gwyther</creator><creatorcontrib>Donata Kurpas ; Ferdinando Petrazzuoli ; Katarzyna Szwamel ; Jane Randall-Smith ; Beata Blahova ; Gindrovel Dumitra ; Katerina Javorska ; Andras Mohos ; Jose Augusto Simoes ; Victoria Tkachenko ; Jean-Baptiste Kern ; Carol Holland ; Holly Gwyther</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: This article describes the views of European rural general practitioners regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the implementation of a chronic care model (CCM) in European rural primary care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods online survey. Data were collected from 227 general practitioners between May and December 2017. Categorical data were analysed using descriptive methods while free-text responses were analysed using qualitative methods. The setting was rural primary care in nine European countries (including Central and Eastern Europe). Main outcomes measures were respondents' evaluations of a chronic care model in their rural healthcare settings in terms of SWOT. Results: The SWOT analysis showed that the expertise of healthcare professionals and the strength of relationships and communications between professionals, caregivers and patients are positive components of the CCM system. However, ensuring adequate staffing levels and staff competency are issues that would need to be addressed. Opportunities included the need to enable patients to participate in decision making by ensuring adequate health literacy. Conclusion: The CCM could certainly have benefits for health care in rural settings but staffing levels and staff competency would need to be addressed before implementation of CCM in such settings. Improving health literacy among patients and their carers will be essential to ensure their full participation in the implementation of a successful CCM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-6354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-6354</identifier><publisher>Townsville QLD: James Cook University</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Care ; Chronically ill ; Evaluation ; Mathematical models ; Medical care ; Medical policy ; Physicians (General practice) ; Planning ; Primary health care</subject><ispartof>Rural and remote health, 2021-12, Vol.21 (4), p.1-13</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donata Kurpas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferdinando Petrazzuoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katarzyna Szwamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jane Randall-Smith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beata Blahova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gindrovel Dumitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katerina Javorska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andras Mohos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jose Augusto Simoes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victoria Tkachenko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Baptiste Kern</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carol Holland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holly Gwyther</creatorcontrib><title>The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: The points of view of European rural general practitioners</title><title>Rural and remote health</title><description>Introduction: This article describes the views of European rural general practitioners regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the implementation of a chronic care model (CCM) in European rural primary care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods online survey. Data were collected from 227 general practitioners between May and December 2017. Categorical data were analysed using descriptive methods while free-text responses were analysed using qualitative methods. The setting was rural primary care in nine European countries (including Central and Eastern Europe). Main outcomes measures were respondents' evaluations of a chronic care model in their rural healthcare settings in terms of SWOT. Results: The SWOT analysis showed that the expertise of healthcare professionals and the strength of relationships and communications between professionals, caregivers and patients are positive components of the CCM system. However, ensuring adequate staffing levels and staff competency are issues that would need to be addressed. Opportunities included the need to enable patients to participate in decision making by ensuring adequate health literacy. Conclusion: The CCM could certainly have benefits for health care in rural settings but staffing levels and staff competency would need to be addressed before implementation of CCM in such settings. Improving health literacy among patients and their carers will be essential to ensure their full participation in the implementation of a successful CCM.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Care</subject><subject>Chronically ill</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical policy</subject><subject>Physicians (General practice)</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><issn>1445-6354</issn><issn>1445-6354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqljUFOwzAQRS1EJQrlDnOBSk6cOilih4o4QPfRyJ3QqexxZLsgrsJpaQILxJbVH329_-ZKLaum2ayt2TTXv-4bdZvzSeu61V29VJ_7I8GYYgaUA7goGeIA5VJyGD0FkoKFo0wtgjumKOzAYSII8UAeWGB3TnEkFEjnhP5i44DpY4YeYPZHljKL35jep_wzeSWh7ym6wtM_SnmlFgP6TPc_eacen3f7p5d1Clx6F70nN6H5hCX3le6NqWzPMsQZqLdda2xrta222nTmn_MvSGFrWQ</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Donata Kurpas</creator><creator>Ferdinando Petrazzuoli</creator><creator>Katarzyna Szwamel</creator><creator>Jane Randall-Smith</creator><creator>Beata Blahova</creator><creator>Gindrovel Dumitra</creator><creator>Katerina Javorska</creator><creator>Andras Mohos</creator><creator>Jose Augusto Simoes</creator><creator>Victoria Tkachenko</creator><creator>Jean-Baptiste Kern</creator><creator>Carol Holland</creator><creator>Holly Gwyther</creator><general>James Cook University</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: The points of view of European rural general practitioners</title><author>Donata Kurpas ; Ferdinando Petrazzuoli ; Katarzyna Szwamel ; Jane Randall-Smith ; Beata Blahova ; Gindrovel Dumitra ; Katerina Javorska ; Andras Mohos ; Jose Augusto Simoes ; Victoria Tkachenko ; Jean-Baptiste Kern ; Carol Holland ; Holly Gwyther</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_2987367606190383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Care</topic><topic>Chronically ill</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical policy</topic><topic>Physicians (General practice)</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donata Kurpas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferdinando Petrazzuoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katarzyna Szwamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jane Randall-Smith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beata Blahova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gindrovel Dumitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katerina Javorska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andras Mohos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jose Augusto Simoes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victoria Tkachenko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Baptiste Kern</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carol Holland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holly Gwyther</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Rural and remote health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donata Kurpas</au><au>Ferdinando Petrazzuoli</au><au>Katarzyna Szwamel</au><au>Jane Randall-Smith</au><au>Beata Blahova</au><au>Gindrovel Dumitra</au><au>Katerina Javorska</au><au>Andras Mohos</au><au>Jose Augusto Simoes</au><au>Victoria Tkachenko</au><au>Jean-Baptiste Kern</au><au>Carol Holland</au><au>Holly Gwyther</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: The points of view of European rural general practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Rural and remote health</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>1445-6354</issn><eissn>1445-6354</eissn><abstract>Introduction: This article describes the views of European rural general practitioners regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the implementation of a chronic care model (CCM) in European rural primary care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods online survey. Data were collected from 227 general practitioners between May and December 2017. Categorical data were analysed using descriptive methods while free-text responses were analysed using qualitative methods. The setting was rural primary care in nine European countries (including Central and Eastern Europe). Main outcomes measures were respondents' evaluations of a chronic care model in their rural healthcare settings in terms of SWOT. Results: The SWOT analysis showed that the expertise of healthcare professionals and the strength of relationships and communications between professionals, caregivers and patients are positive components of the CCM system. However, ensuring adequate staffing levels and staff competency are issues that would need to be addressed. Opportunities included the need to enable patients to participate in decision making by ensuring adequate health literacy. Conclusion: The CCM could certainly have benefits for health care in rural settings but staffing levels and staff competency would need to be addressed before implementation of CCM in such settings. Improving health literacy among patients and their carers will be essential to ensure their full participation in the implementation of a successful CCM.</abstract><cop>Townsville QLD</cop><pub>James Cook University</pub><tpages>1-13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-6354
ispartof Rural and remote health, 2021-12, Vol.21 (4), p.1-13
issn 1445-6354
1445-6354
language
recordid cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_298736760619038
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Attitudes
Care
Chronically ill
Evaluation
Mathematical models
Medical care
Medical policy
Physicians (General practice)
Planning
Primary health care
title The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: The points of view of European rural general practitioners
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T11%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20pros%20and%20cons%20of%20the%20implementation%20of%20a%20chronic%20care%20model%20in%20European%20rural%20primary%20care:%20The%20points%20of%20view%20of%20European%20rural%20general%20practitioners&rft.jtitle=Rural%20and%20remote%20health&rft.au=Donata%20Kurpas&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=1445-6354&rft.eissn=1445-6354&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Crmit%3E10.3316/informit.298736760619038%3C/rmit%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_2987367606190383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.298736760619038&rfr_iscdi=true