Loading…

The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia

A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Federal law review 2018-12, Vol.46 (4), p.575-594
Main Authors: Baogang He, Laura Allison-Reumann, Michael Breen
Format: Article
Language:
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 594
container_issue 4
container_start_page 575
container_title Federal law review
container_volume 46
creator Baogang He
Laura Allison-Reumann
Michael Breen
description A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rmit</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_412558321444393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.412558321444393</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/informit.412558321444393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_4125583214443933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj82KwjAURoMoWH_e4b5AIU2aamE2g8zgA7hwIZSQ3tYrMRly44BvPzr4Bq4-OJyz-CaiqOq6LptWbaeikLLZlEqa41wsmC9SKqNaU4jT4YzwEz1lcgxxAEZ38zbBgD0m64mvYEMP-aG9EIzxF1OwweEzSOhppHhj6OnBmfIdKMAnk12J2WA94_q1S_Hx_XXY7ct0pdy56D26TDHwxWbuKtlpXTUdhSH-C3WljNlq9fyhW63fzP8AW59UxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Baogang He ; Laura Allison-Reumann ; Michael Breen</creator><creatorcontrib>Baogang He ; Laura Allison-Reumann ; Michael Breen</creatorcontrib><description>A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0067-205X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1444-6928</identifier><subject>Cultural pluralism ; Federal government ; Political aspects ; Secularism</subject><ispartof>Federal law review, 2018-12, Vol.46 (4), p.575-594</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baogang He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laura Allison-Reumann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael Breen</creatorcontrib><title>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</title><title>Federal law review</title><description>A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one.</description><subject>Cultural pluralism</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Secularism</subject><issn>0067-205X</issn><issn>1444-6928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlj82KwjAURoMoWH_e4b5AIU2aamE2g8zgA7hwIZSQ3tYrMRly44BvPzr4Bq4-OJyz-CaiqOq6LptWbaeikLLZlEqa41wsmC9SKqNaU4jT4YzwEz1lcgxxAEZ38zbBgD0m64mvYEMP-aG9EIzxF1OwweEzSOhppHhj6OnBmfIdKMAnk12J2WA94_q1S_Hx_XXY7ct0pdy56D26TDHwxWbuKtlpXTUdhSH-C3WljNlq9fyhW63fzP8AW59UxQ</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Baogang He</creator><creator>Laura Allison-Reumann</creator><creator>Michael Breen</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</title><author>Baogang He ; Laura Allison-Reumann ; Michael Breen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_4125583214443933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cultural pluralism</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Secularism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baogang He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laura Allison-Reumann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael Breen</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Federal law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baogang He</au><au>Laura Allison-Reumann</au><au>Michael Breen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</atitle><jtitle>Federal law review</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>594</epage><pages>575-594</pages><issn>0067-205X</issn><eissn>1444-6928</eissn><abstract>A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one.</abstract><tpages>575-594</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0067-205X
ispartof Federal law review, 2018-12, Vol.46 (4), p.575-594
issn 0067-205X
1444-6928
language
recordid cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_412558321444393
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Cultural pluralism
Federal government
Political aspects
Secularism
title The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20politics%20of%20secular%20federalism%20and%20the%20federal%20governance%20of%20religious%20diversity%20in%20Asia&rft.jtitle=Federal%20law%20review&rft.au=Baogang%20He&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=594&rft.pages=575-594&rft.issn=0067-205X&rft.eissn=1444-6928&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Crmit%3E10.3316/informit.412558321444393%3C/rmit%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_4125583214443933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.412558321444393&rfr_iscdi=true