Loading…
The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia
A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully....
Saved in:
Published in: | Federal law review 2018-12, Vol.46 (4), p.575-594 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 594 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 575 |
container_title | Federal law review |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Baogang He Laura Allison-Reumann Michael Breen |
description | A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>rmit</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_412558321444393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.412558321444393</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/informit.412558321444393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_4125583214443933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj82KwjAURoMoWH_e4b5AIU2aamE2g8zgA7hwIZSQ3tYrMRly44BvPzr4Bq4-OJyz-CaiqOq6LptWbaeikLLZlEqa41wsmC9SKqNaU4jT4YzwEz1lcgxxAEZ38zbBgD0m64mvYEMP-aG9EIzxF1OwweEzSOhppHhj6OnBmfIdKMAnk12J2WA94_q1S_Hx_XXY7ct0pdy56D26TDHwxWbuKtlpXTUdhSH-C3WljNlq9fyhW63fzP8AW59UxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Baogang He ; Laura Allison-Reumann ; Michael Breen</creator><creatorcontrib>Baogang He ; Laura Allison-Reumann ; Michael Breen</creatorcontrib><description>A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0067-205X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1444-6928</identifier><subject>Cultural pluralism ; Federal government ; Political aspects ; Secularism</subject><ispartof>Federal law review, 2018-12, Vol.46 (4), p.575-594</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baogang He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laura Allison-Reumann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael Breen</creatorcontrib><title>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</title><title>Federal law review</title><description>A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one.</description><subject>Cultural pluralism</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Secularism</subject><issn>0067-205X</issn><issn>1444-6928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlj82KwjAURoMoWH_e4b5AIU2aamE2g8zgA7hwIZSQ3tYrMRly44BvPzr4Bq4-OJyz-CaiqOq6LptWbaeikLLZlEqa41wsmC9SKqNaU4jT4YzwEz1lcgxxAEZ38zbBgD0m64mvYEMP-aG9EIzxF1OwweEzSOhppHhj6OnBmfIdKMAnk12J2WA94_q1S_Hx_XXY7ct0pdy56D26TDHwxWbuKtlpXTUdhSH-C3WljNlq9fyhW63fzP8AW59UxQ</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Baogang He</creator><creator>Laura Allison-Reumann</creator><creator>Michael Breen</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</title><author>Baogang He ; Laura Allison-Reumann ; Michael Breen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_4125583214443933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cultural pluralism</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Secularism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baogang He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laura Allison-Reumann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael Breen</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Federal law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baogang He</au><au>Laura Allison-Reumann</au><au>Michael Breen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia</atitle><jtitle>Federal law review</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>594</epage><pages>575-594</pages><issn>0067-205X</issn><eissn>1444-6928</eissn><abstract>A secular approach has dominated federal studies, perhaps because there seems a natural fit between federalism and secularism. However, the federal systems or practices of Asia bring that close association into question, and the federal accommodation of religious demands has not been examined fully. This article focuses on how religion has been approached, accommodated or resisted in federal and quasi-federal states in Asia. We select India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Nepal as cases. We first explore the relationship between federalism, secularism and religion, and find that secular values at the point of federalisation played an important role in federalism's establishment, but that they were later modified in the practice of federal accommodation of religion. We also identify and examine the federal governance of religious diversity, which features three types of accommodation - centrally-based, unit-based and group-based accommodation - with accommodative practices sometimes being for the benefit of a majority religion, and sometimes for a minority one.</abstract><tpages>575-594</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0067-205X |
ispartof | Federal law review, 2018-12, Vol.46 (4), p.575-594 |
issn | 0067-205X 1444-6928 |
language | |
recordid | cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_412558321444393 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Cultural pluralism Federal government Political aspects Secularism |
title | The politics of secular federalism and the federal governance of religious diversity in Asia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20politics%20of%20secular%20federalism%20and%20the%20federal%20governance%20of%20religious%20diversity%20in%20Asia&rft.jtitle=Federal%20law%20review&rft.au=Baogang%20He&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=594&rft.pages=575-594&rft.issn=0067-205X&rft.eissn=1444-6928&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Crmit%3E10.3316/informit.412558321444393%3C/rmit%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_4125583214443933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.412558321444393&rfr_iscdi=true |