Cuttlefish camouflage: context-dependent body pattern use during motion

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2009-11, Vol.276 (1675), p.3963-3969
• Main Authors: Zylinski, S., Osorio, D., Shohet, A. J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal camouflage; Animals; Behavior, Animal - physiology; Body image; Camouflage; Cephalopods; Checkerboards; Colors; Cuttlefish; Dazzle; Military camouflage; Motion; Motor Activity - physiology; Pigmentation; Predators; Sepia - physiology; Vision; Visual perception
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 1471-2954; 1471-2945
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1083

It is virtually impossible to camouflage a moving target against a non-uniform background, but strategies have been proposed to reduce detection and targeting of movement. Best known is the idea that high contrast markings produce 'motion dazzle', which impairs judgement of speed and trajectory. The ability of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis to change its visual appearance allows us to compare the animal's choice of patterns during movement to the predictions of models of motion camouflage. We compare cuttlefish body patterns used during movement with those expressed when static on two background types; one of which promotes low-contrast mottle patterns and the other promotes high-contrast disruptive patterns. We find that the body pattern used during motion is context-specific and that high-contrast body pattern components are significantly reduced during movement. Thus, in our experimental conditions, cuttlefish do not use high contrast motion dazzle. It may be that, in addition to being inherently conspicuous during movement, moving high-contrast patterns will attract attention because moving particles in coastal waters tend to be of small size and of low relative contrast.