Loading…
Biological auctions with multiple rewards
The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2015-08, Vol.282 (1812), p.20151041-20151041 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593 |
container_end_page | 20151041 |
container_issue | 1812 |
container_start_page | 20151041 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 282 |
creator | Reiter, Johannes G. Kanodia, Ayush Gupta, Raghav Nowak, Martin A. Chatterjee, Krishnendu |
description | The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2015.1041 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2015_1041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1697211922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMqKOMKT4I47jBQkqvqRKLDBbjuO2rpw42AlV_3scWioYENP55Hc_3bsHwDmCEwR5fu1DU0wwRDS2KToAQ5QylGBO00MwhDzDSZ5SPAAnIawghJzm9BgMcIZyCDM-BFd3xlm3MErasexUa1wdxmvTLsdVZ1vTWD32ei19GU7B0VzaoM92dQTeHu5fp0_J7OXxeXo7S1SasTYpOaFpmUqoCYO5YpSoEqWkJARjXMQHZqjIM6ZlXBozxTmdK6IgLyHTGeVkBG623KYrKl0qXbdeWtF4U0m_EU4a8funNkuxcB8i-swpxhFwuQN4997p0IrKBKWtlbV2XRDRep5RQjH_X5pxhhHiX9TJVqq8C8Hr-X4jBEUfheijEH0Uoo8iDlz89LGXf98-CshW4N0mHtQpo9uNWLnO17H9C_sJKk6VdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697211922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Reiter, Johannes G. ; Kanodia, Ayush ; Gupta, Raghav ; Nowak, Martin A. ; Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creator><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Johannes G. ; Kanodia, Ayush ; Gupta, Raghav ; Nowak, Martin A. ; Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creatorcontrib><description>The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26180069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Auction Theory ; Biological Evolution ; Competitive Behavior ; Evolutionarily Stable Strategy ; Evolutionary Dynamics ; Evolutionary Game Theory ; Game Theory ; Genetic Fitness ; Models, Biological ; Reproduction ; Reward</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-08, Vol.282 (1812), p.20151041-20151041</ispartof><rights>2015 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0170-7353</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528522/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528522/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Johannes G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanodia, Ayush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Raghav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creatorcontrib><title>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.</description><subject>Auction Theory</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior</subject><subject>Evolutionarily Stable Strategy</subject><subject>Evolutionary Dynamics</subject><subject>Evolutionary Game Theory</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Genetic Fitness</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reward</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMqKOMKT4I47jBQkqvqRKLDBbjuO2rpw42AlV_3scWioYENP55Hc_3bsHwDmCEwR5fu1DU0wwRDS2KToAQ5QylGBO00MwhDzDSZ5SPAAnIawghJzm9BgMcIZyCDM-BFd3xlm3MErasexUa1wdxmvTLsdVZ1vTWD32ei19GU7B0VzaoM92dQTeHu5fp0_J7OXxeXo7S1SasTYpOaFpmUqoCYO5YpSoEqWkJARjXMQHZqjIM6ZlXBozxTmdK6IgLyHTGeVkBG623KYrKl0qXbdeWtF4U0m_EU4a8funNkuxcB8i-swpxhFwuQN4997p0IrKBKWtlbV2XRDRep5RQjH_X5pxhhHiX9TJVqq8C8Hr-X4jBEUfheijEH0Uoo8iDlz89LGXf98-CshW4N0mHtQpo9uNWLnO17H9C_sJKk6VdA</recordid><startdate>20150807</startdate><enddate>20150807</enddate><creator>Reiter, Johannes G.</creator><creator>Kanodia, Ayush</creator><creator>Gupta, Raghav</creator><creator>Nowak, Martin A.</creator><creator>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-7353</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150807</creationdate><title>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</title><author>Reiter, Johannes G. ; Kanodia, Ayush ; Gupta, Raghav ; Nowak, Martin A. ; Chatterjee, Krishnendu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Auction Theory</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior</topic><topic>Evolutionarily Stable Strategy</topic><topic>Evolutionary Dynamics</topic><topic>Evolutionary Game Theory</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Genetic Fitness</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reward</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Johannes G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanodia, Ayush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Raghav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reiter, Johannes G.</au><au>Kanodia, Ayush</au><au>Gupta, Raghav</au><au>Nowak, Martin A.</au><au>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2015-08-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>282</volume><issue>1812</issue><spage>20151041</spage><epage>20151041</epage><pages>20151041-20151041</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>26180069</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2015.1041</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-7353</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-08, Vol.282 (1812), p.20151041-20151041 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2015_1041 |
source | NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); JSTOR; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Auction Theory Biological Evolution Competitive Behavior Evolutionarily Stable Strategy Evolutionary Dynamics Evolutionary Game Theory Game Theory Genetic Fitness Models, Biological Reproduction Reward |
title | Biological auctions with multiple rewards |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T08%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20auctions%20with%20multiple%20rewards&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Reiter,%20Johannes%20G.&rft.date=2015-08-07&rft.volume=282&rft.issue=1812&rft.spage=20151041&rft.epage=20151041&rft.pages=20151041-20151041&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.1041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_royal%3E1697211922%3C/proquest_royal%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697211922&rft_id=info:pmid/26180069&rfr_iscdi=true |