Loading…

Biological auctions with multiple rewards

The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2015-08, Vol.282 (1812), p.20151041-20151041
Main Authors: Reiter, Johannes G., Kanodia, Ayush, Gupta, Raghav, Nowak, Martin A., Chatterjee, Krishnendu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593
container_end_page 20151041
container_issue 1812
container_start_page 20151041
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 282
creator Reiter, Johannes G.
Kanodia, Ayush
Gupta, Raghav
Nowak, Martin A.
Chatterjee, Krishnendu
description The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2015.1041
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2015_1041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1697211922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMqKOMKT4I47jBQkqvqRKLDBbjuO2rpw42AlV_3scWioYENP55Hc_3bsHwDmCEwR5fu1DU0wwRDS2KToAQ5QylGBO00MwhDzDSZ5SPAAnIawghJzm9BgMcIZyCDM-BFd3xlm3MErasexUa1wdxmvTLsdVZ1vTWD32ei19GU7B0VzaoM92dQTeHu5fp0_J7OXxeXo7S1SasTYpOaFpmUqoCYO5YpSoEqWkJARjXMQHZqjIM6ZlXBozxTmdK6IgLyHTGeVkBG623KYrKl0qXbdeWtF4U0m_EU4a8funNkuxcB8i-swpxhFwuQN4997p0IrKBKWtlbV2XRDRep5RQjH_X5pxhhHiX9TJVqq8C8Hr-X4jBEUfheijEH0Uoo8iDlz89LGXf98-CshW4N0mHtQpo9uNWLnO17H9C_sJKk6VdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697211922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Reiter, Johannes G. ; Kanodia, Ayush ; Gupta, Raghav ; Nowak, Martin A. ; Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creator><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Johannes G. ; Kanodia, Ayush ; Gupta, Raghav ; Nowak, Martin A. ; Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creatorcontrib><description>The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26180069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Auction Theory ; Biological Evolution ; Competitive Behavior ; Evolutionarily Stable Strategy ; Evolutionary Dynamics ; Evolutionary Game Theory ; Game Theory ; Genetic Fitness ; Models, Biological ; Reproduction ; Reward</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-08, Vol.282 (1812), p.20151041-20151041</ispartof><rights>2015 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0170-7353</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528522/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528522/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Johannes G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanodia, Ayush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Raghav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creatorcontrib><title>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.</description><subject>Auction Theory</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior</subject><subject>Evolutionarily Stable Strategy</subject><subject>Evolutionary Dynamics</subject><subject>Evolutionary Game Theory</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Genetic Fitness</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reward</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMqKOMKT4I47jBQkqvqRKLDBbjuO2rpw42AlV_3scWioYENP55Hc_3bsHwDmCEwR5fu1DU0wwRDS2KToAQ5QylGBO00MwhDzDSZ5SPAAnIawghJzm9BgMcIZyCDM-BFd3xlm3MErasexUa1wdxmvTLsdVZ1vTWD32ei19GU7B0VzaoM92dQTeHu5fp0_J7OXxeXo7S1SasTYpOaFpmUqoCYO5YpSoEqWkJARjXMQHZqjIM6ZlXBozxTmdK6IgLyHTGeVkBG623KYrKl0qXbdeWtF4U0m_EU4a8funNkuxcB8i-swpxhFwuQN4997p0IrKBKWtlbV2XRDRep5RQjH_X5pxhhHiX9TJVqq8C8Hr-X4jBEUfheijEH0Uoo8iDlz89LGXf98-CshW4N0mHtQpo9uNWLnO17H9C_sJKk6VdA</recordid><startdate>20150807</startdate><enddate>20150807</enddate><creator>Reiter, Johannes G.</creator><creator>Kanodia, Ayush</creator><creator>Gupta, Raghav</creator><creator>Nowak, Martin A.</creator><creator>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-7353</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150807</creationdate><title>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</title><author>Reiter, Johannes G. ; Kanodia, Ayush ; Gupta, Raghav ; Nowak, Martin A. ; Chatterjee, Krishnendu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Auction Theory</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior</topic><topic>Evolutionarily Stable Strategy</topic><topic>Evolutionary Dynamics</topic><topic>Evolutionary Game Theory</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Genetic Fitness</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reward</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Johannes G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanodia, Ayush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Raghav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reiter, Johannes G.</au><au>Kanodia, Ayush</au><au>Gupta, Raghav</au><au>Nowak, Martin A.</au><au>Chatterjee, Krishnendu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological auctions with multiple rewards</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2015-08-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>282</volume><issue>1812</issue><spage>20151041</spage><epage>20151041</epage><pages>20151041-20151041</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>26180069</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2015.1041</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-7353</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-08, Vol.282 (1812), p.20151041-20151041
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2015_1041
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); JSTOR; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Auction Theory
Biological Evolution
Competitive Behavior
Evolutionarily Stable Strategy
Evolutionary Dynamics
Evolutionary Game Theory
Game Theory
Genetic Fitness
Models, Biological
Reproduction
Reward
title Biological auctions with multiple rewards
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T08%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20auctions%20with%20multiple%20rewards&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Reiter,%20Johannes%20G.&rft.date=2015-08-07&rft.volume=282&rft.issue=1812&rft.spage=20151041&rft.epage=20151041&rft.pages=20151041-20151041&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.1041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_royal%3E1697211922%3C/proquest_royal%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-d9354d4a0e3708c753cd143d33222b43d271b867ea01527c995fc3c09d07e6593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697211922&rft_id=info:pmid/26180069&rfr_iscdi=true