Loading…

Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]

Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered fundamentally simply because organisms interact and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 1990-11, Vol.330 (1257), p.175-190
Main Authors: Kareiva, Peter, Mullen, A., Southwood, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83
container_end_page 190
container_issue 1257
container_start_page 175
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 330
creator Kareiva, Peter
Mullen, A.
Southwood, R.
description Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives. Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover, there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy, instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension, in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns, which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions, and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of st
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.1990.0191
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rstb_1990_0191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>76855</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>76855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Udtu0zAYthBIlI1bLrjyC6T8ruMTNwi6cZAmDW1FXCBkuY5DXaVxZCeD8PQ4KUKq0HZl_4fv4M8IvSCwJKDkq5j67ZIoBUsgijxCC1IKUqyUgMdoAYqvCllS_hQ9S2kPAIqJcoG-fg7d0JjehxZfjK05eJuwb_Ftl3umaUa8Doeucb_wZXvnY2gPru3Ta7zZuRBHbNoKX5je4G_zzSc7pJS5vp-jJ7Vpknv-9zxDX95fbtYfi6vrD5_Wb68KW3LeF7IypCRSAuPbylXOgLOUCFbXDmoDXCpaKl5TrmBlhVUVk4ICc1teWbF1kp6h5ZHXxpBSdLXuoj-YOGoCeopFT7HoKRY9xZIB6QiIYczGgvWuH_U-DLHNpb653byblu8oBU9WTGiQlAADCkL_9t1MN7PlBe1TGpye105l_lelD6ne6_XlEbVPfYj_Xia4ZCwP4Tjc-R-7nz46fcKdiy6TTS5nfznUDHnzIGRSt6Ht8xefAHU9NI3uqpr-AaXsvuo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</title><source>JSTOR</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Kareiva, Peter ; Mullen, A. ; Southwood, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kareiva, Peter ; Mullen, A. ; Southwood, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives. Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover, there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy, instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension, in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns, which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions, and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of studies report general changes in species interactions associated with manipulations of habitat subdivision. Observational studies with adequate data concerning dispersal and scale are also scarce; but those few observational studies with the appropriate supporting information consistently show profound spatial effects, especially effects due to habitat subdivision. The challenge for empiricists is to investigate more rigorously the roles of spatial subdivision and dispersal in natural communities. The challenge for theoreticians is to make the empiricist's job easier; this can best be done by delineating when spatial effects are most likely to be influential, and by offering guidance on how to design appropriate experiments. Simply saying that the spatial environment is important is to mouth a platitude: what we need to know is whether this presumed importance amounts to much in natural systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Ecological modeling ; Environmental conservation ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Metapopulation ecology ; Modeling ; Population dynamics ; Population ecology ; Predators ; Spatial models</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 1990-11, Vol.330 (1257), p.175-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The Royal Society</rights><rights>Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/76855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/76855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58217,58450</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kareiva, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southwood, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><description>Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives. Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover, there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy, instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension, in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns, which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions, and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of studies report general changes in species interactions associated with manipulations of habitat subdivision. Observational studies with adequate data concerning dispersal and scale are also scarce; but those few observational studies with the appropriate supporting information consistently show profound spatial effects, especially effects due to habitat subdivision. The challenge for empiricists is to investigate more rigorously the roles of spatial subdivision and dispersal in natural communities. The challenge for theoreticians is to make the empiricist's job easier; this can best be done by delineating when spatial effects are most likely to be influential, and by offering guidance on how to design appropriate experiments. Simply saying that the spatial environment is important is to mouth a platitude: what we need to know is whether this presumed importance amounts to much in natural systems.</description><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Udtu0zAYthBIlI1bLrjyC6T8ruMTNwi6cZAmDW1FXCBkuY5DXaVxZCeD8PQ4KUKq0HZl_4fv4M8IvSCwJKDkq5j67ZIoBUsgijxCC1IKUqyUgMdoAYqvCllS_hQ9S2kPAIqJcoG-fg7d0JjehxZfjK05eJuwb_Ftl3umaUa8Doeucb_wZXvnY2gPru3Ta7zZuRBHbNoKX5je4G_zzSc7pJS5vp-jJ7Vpknv-9zxDX95fbtYfi6vrD5_Wb68KW3LeF7IypCRSAuPbylXOgLOUCFbXDmoDXCpaKl5TrmBlhVUVk4ICc1teWbF1kp6h5ZHXxpBSdLXuoj-YOGoCeopFT7HoKRY9xZIB6QiIYczGgvWuH_U-DLHNpb653byblu8oBU9WTGiQlAADCkL_9t1MN7PlBe1TGpye105l_lelD6ne6_XlEbVPfYj_Xia4ZCwP4Tjc-R-7nz46fcKdiy6TTS5nfznUDHnzIGRSt6Ht8xefAHU9NI3uqpr-AaXsvuo</recordid><startdate>19901129</startdate><enddate>19901129</enddate><creator>Kareiva, Peter</creator><creator>Mullen, A.</creator><creator>Southwood, R.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901129</creationdate><title>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</title><author>Kareiva, Peter ; Mullen, A. ; Southwood, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kareiva, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southwood, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kareiva, Peter</au><au>Mullen, A.</au><au>Southwood, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</stitle><date>1990-11-29</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>330</volume><issue>1257</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>175-190</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives. Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover, there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy, instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension, in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns, which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions, and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of studies report general changes in species interactions associated with manipulations of habitat subdivision. Observational studies with adequate data concerning dispersal and scale are also scarce; but those few observational studies with the appropriate supporting information consistently show profound spatial effects, especially effects due to habitat subdivision. The challenge for empiricists is to investigate more rigorously the roles of spatial subdivision and dispersal in natural communities. The challenge for theoreticians is to make the empiricist's job easier; this can best be done by delineating when spatial effects are most likely to be influential, and by offering guidance on how to design appropriate experiments. Simply saying that the spatial environment is important is to mouth a platitude: what we need to know is whether this presumed importance amounts to much in natural systems.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><doi>10.1098/rstb.1990.0191</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 1990-11, Vol.330 (1257), p.175-190
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rstb_1990_0191
source JSTOR; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Ecological modeling
Environmental conservation
Habitat conservation
Habitats
Metapopulation ecology
Modeling
Population dynamics
Population ecology
Predators
Spatial models
title Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A26%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20Dynamics%20in%20Spatially%20Complex%20Environments:%20Theory%20and%20Data%20%5Band%20Discussion%5D&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Kareiva,%20Peter&rft.date=1990-11-29&rft.volume=330&rft.issue=1257&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=175-190&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.1990.0191&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_royal%3E76855%3C/jstor_royal%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=76855&rfr_iscdi=true