Loading…
Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]
Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered fundamentally simply because organisms interact and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 1990-11, Vol.330 (1257), p.175-190 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83 |
container_end_page | 190 |
container_issue | 1257 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
container_volume | 330 |
creator | Kareiva, Peter Mullen, A. Southwood, R. |
description | Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has
potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered
fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives.
Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ
three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover,
there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities
for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial
models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy,
instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that
balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension,
in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both
predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address
slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local
dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns,
which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions,
and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally
in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should
be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental
variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale
and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of st |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.1990.0191 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rstb_1990_0191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>76855</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>76855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Udtu0zAYthBIlI1bLrjyC6T8ruMTNwi6cZAmDW1FXCBkuY5DXaVxZCeD8PQ4KUKq0HZl_4fv4M8IvSCwJKDkq5j67ZIoBUsgijxCC1IKUqyUgMdoAYqvCllS_hQ9S2kPAIqJcoG-fg7d0JjehxZfjK05eJuwb_Ftl3umaUa8Doeucb_wZXvnY2gPru3Ta7zZuRBHbNoKX5je4G_zzSc7pJS5vp-jJ7Vpknv-9zxDX95fbtYfi6vrD5_Wb68KW3LeF7IypCRSAuPbylXOgLOUCFbXDmoDXCpaKl5TrmBlhVUVk4ICc1teWbF1kp6h5ZHXxpBSdLXuoj-YOGoCeopFT7HoKRY9xZIB6QiIYczGgvWuH_U-DLHNpb653byblu8oBU9WTGiQlAADCkL_9t1MN7PlBe1TGpye105l_lelD6ne6_XlEbVPfYj_Xia4ZCwP4Tjc-R-7nz46fcKdiy6TTS5nfznUDHnzIGRSt6Ht8xefAHU9NI3uqpr-AaXsvuo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</title><source>JSTOR</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Kareiva, Peter ; Mullen, A. ; Southwood, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kareiva, Peter ; Mullen, A. ; Southwood, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has
potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered
fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives.
Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ
three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover,
there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities
for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial
models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy,
instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that
balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension,
in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both
predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address
slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local
dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns,
which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions,
and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally
in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should
be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental
variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale
and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of studies report
general changes in species interactions associated with manipulations of habitat subdivision. Observational studies with adequate
data concerning dispersal and scale are also scarce; but those few observational studies with the appropriate supporting information
consistently show profound spatial effects, especially effects due to habitat subdivision. The challenge for empiricists is
to investigate more rigorously the roles of spatial subdivision and dispersal in natural communities. The challenge for theoreticians
is to make the empiricist's job easier; this can best be done by delineating when spatial effects are most likely to be influential,
and by offering guidance on how to design appropriate experiments. Simply saying that the spatial environment is important
is to mouth a platitude: what we need to know is whether this presumed importance amounts to much in natural systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Ecological modeling ; Environmental conservation ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Metapopulation ecology ; Modeling ; Population dynamics ; Population ecology ; Predators ; Spatial models</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 1990-11, Vol.330 (1257), p.175-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The Royal Society</rights><rights>Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/76855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/76855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58217,58450</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kareiva, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southwood, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</addtitle><description>Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has
potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered
fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives.
Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ
three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover,
there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities
for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial
models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy,
instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that
balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension,
in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both
predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address
slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local
dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns,
which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions,
and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally
in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should
be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental
variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale
and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of studies report
general changes in species interactions associated with manipulations of habitat subdivision. Observational studies with adequate
data concerning dispersal and scale are also scarce; but those few observational studies with the appropriate supporting information
consistently show profound spatial effects, especially effects due to habitat subdivision. The challenge for empiricists is
to investigate more rigorously the roles of spatial subdivision and dispersal in natural communities. The challenge for theoreticians
is to make the empiricist's job easier; this can best be done by delineating when spatial effects are most likely to be influential,
and by offering guidance on how to design appropriate experiments. Simply saying that the spatial environment is important
is to mouth a platitude: what we need to know is whether this presumed importance amounts to much in natural systems.</description><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Udtu0zAYthBIlI1bLrjyC6T8ruMTNwi6cZAmDW1FXCBkuY5DXaVxZCeD8PQ4KUKq0HZl_4fv4M8IvSCwJKDkq5j67ZIoBUsgijxCC1IKUqyUgMdoAYqvCllS_hQ9S2kPAIqJcoG-fg7d0JjehxZfjK05eJuwb_Ftl3umaUa8Doeucb_wZXvnY2gPru3Ta7zZuRBHbNoKX5je4G_zzSc7pJS5vp-jJ7Vpknv-9zxDX95fbtYfi6vrD5_Wb68KW3LeF7IypCRSAuPbylXOgLOUCFbXDmoDXCpaKl5TrmBlhVUVk4ICc1teWbF1kp6h5ZHXxpBSdLXuoj-YOGoCeopFT7HoKRY9xZIB6QiIYczGgvWuH_U-DLHNpb653byblu8oBU9WTGiQlAADCkL_9t1MN7PlBe1TGpye105l_lelD6ne6_XlEbVPfYj_Xia4ZCwP4Tjc-R-7nz46fcKdiy6TTS5nfznUDHnzIGRSt6Ht8xefAHU9NI3uqpr-AaXsvuo</recordid><startdate>19901129</startdate><enddate>19901129</enddate><creator>Kareiva, Peter</creator><creator>Mullen, A.</creator><creator>Southwood, R.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901129</creationdate><title>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</title><author>Kareiva, Peter ; Mullen, A. ; Southwood, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kareiva, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southwood, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kareiva, Peter</au><au>Mullen, A.</au><au>Southwood, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion]</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</stitle><date>1990-11-29</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>330</volume><issue>1257</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>175-190</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Population dynamics and species interactions are spread out in space. This might seem like a trivial observation, but it has
potentially important consequences. In particular, mathematical models show that the dynamics of populations can be altered
fundamentally simply because organisms interact and disperse rather than being confined to one position for their entire lives.
Models that deal with dispersal and spatially distributed populations are extraordinarily varied, partly because they employ
three distinct characterizations of space: as `islands' (or `metapopulations'), as `stepping-stones', or as a continuum. Moreover,
there are several different ways of representing dispersal in spatially structured environments, as well as several possibilities
for allowing environmental variation to come into play. In spite of this variety, a few common themes emerge from spatial
models. First, island and stepping-stone models emphasize that little can be concluded from simply recording patterns of occupancy,
instead a metapopulation's fate will be determined by the balance between local extinction and recolonization and how that
balance interacts with random catastrophes. Island and stepping-stone models also make it clear that the spatial dimension,
in particular spatial subdivision, can alter the stability of species interactions and opportunities for coexistence in both
predator-prey and competitive systems. Continuum models, which usually take the form of reaction-diffusion equations, address
slightly different questions. Reaction-diffusion theory suggests that in uniform environments, certain combinations of local
dynamics and dispersal can produce persistent irregularities in the dispersion of species. These striking spatial patterns,
which are called diffusive instabilities, can arise from predator-prey interactions, Lotka-Volterra competitive interactions,
and from density-dependent population growth in an age-structured population. Moreover, although they differ fundamentally
in their structure, the three major classes of spatial models share the common generalization that spatial effects should
be expected only for: (i) selected spatial scales; (ii) specific dispersal rates, and (iii) particular patterns of environmental
variation relative to the frequency and range of dispersal. The theoretical possibilities are thus contingent on spatial scale
and dispersal rates. Although explicit experimental tests of spatial models are non-existent, a handful of studies report
general changes in species interactions associated with manipulations of habitat subdivision. Observational studies with adequate
data concerning dispersal and scale are also scarce; but those few observational studies with the appropriate supporting information
consistently show profound spatial effects, especially effects due to habitat subdivision. The challenge for empiricists is
to investigate more rigorously the roles of spatial subdivision and dispersal in natural communities. The challenge for theoreticians
is to make the empiricist's job easier; this can best be done by delineating when spatial effects are most likely to be influential,
and by offering guidance on how to design appropriate experiments. Simply saying that the spatial environment is important
is to mouth a platitude: what we need to know is whether this presumed importance amounts to much in natural systems.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><doi>10.1098/rstb.1990.0191</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 1990-11, Vol.330 (1257), p.175-190 |
issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rstb_1990_0191 |
source | JSTOR; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Ecological modeling Environmental conservation Habitat conservation Habitats Metapopulation ecology Modeling Population dynamics Population ecology Predators Spatial models |
title | Population Dynamics in Spatially Complex Environments: Theory and Data [and Discussion] |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A26%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20Dynamics%20in%20Spatially%20Complex%20Environments:%20Theory%20and%20Data%20%5Band%20Discussion%5D&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Kareiva,%20Peter&rft.date=1990-11-29&rft.volume=330&rft.issue=1257&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=175-190&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.1990.0191&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_royal%3E76855%3C/jstor_royal%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8da14188056bdedea0ec3175ffe0fa06893496f36902c7c9d587305eb6dc7be83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=76855&rfr_iscdi=true |