Loading…
Effect of counterions on the micellization and monolayer behaviour of cationic gemini surfactantsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00775b
The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior. This study included eight ethanediyl-α,ω-bis-(dimethylhexadecylammonium) gemini...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1834 |
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 1825 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Islam, M. S Shortall, S. M Mekhail, G. M Callender, S. P Madkhali, O Bharwani, Z Ayyash, D Kobernyk, K Wettig, S. D |
description | The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior. This study included eight ethanediyl-α,ω-bis-(dimethylhexadecylammonium) gemini surfactants (GS, also known as 16-2-16) having counterions of chloride (Cl
−
), bromide (Br
−
), malate, tartrate, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), guanosine monophosphate (GMP), cytidine monophosphate (CMP), and uridine monophosphate (UMP). Tensiometry, conductivity and Langmuir monolayer measurements were performed to investigate the micellization and surface behaviour of each surfactant.
The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/c7cp00775b |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>rsc</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rsc_primary_c7cp00775b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c7cp00775b</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-rsc_primary_c7cp00775b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj09LAzEQxYMoWKsX78J400NrQtqu9apb7KmHel9m04mN5M-SZAv1Y_kJXVbRg2BP85j33g8eY5eCjwWX8ztVqIbzopjWR2wgJjM5mvP7yfGPLman7CylN865mAo5YB-l1qQyBA0qtD5TNMEnCB7ylsAZRdaad8zdF9BvwAUfLO4pQk1b3JnQxr7bJ4yCV3LGG0ht1Kgy-pxK2_Fjb6a2aSw58hnjHozXIbov9E25Xt4C7tBYrC2NYU0ET6vlA_xdds5ONNpEF993yK4W5cvj8ygmVTXRuA5e_cblkF3_51fNRstDjE_OVG6Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of counterions on the micellization and monolayer behaviour of cationic gemini surfactantsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00775b</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry Journals</source><creator>Islam, M. S ; Shortall, S. M ; Mekhail, G. M ; Callender, S. P ; Madkhali, O ; Bharwani, Z ; Ayyash, D ; Kobernyk, K ; Wettig, S. D</creator><creatorcontrib>Islam, M. S ; Shortall, S. M ; Mekhail, G. M ; Callender, S. P ; Madkhali, O ; Bharwani, Z ; Ayyash, D ; Kobernyk, K ; Wettig, S. D</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior. This study included eight ethanediyl-α,ω-bis-(dimethylhexadecylammonium) gemini surfactants (GS, also known as 16-2-16) having counterions of chloride (Cl
−
), bromide (Br
−
), malate, tartrate, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), guanosine monophosphate (GMP), cytidine monophosphate (CMP), and uridine monophosphate (UMP). Tensiometry, conductivity and Langmuir monolayer measurements were performed to investigate the micellization and surface behaviour of each surfactant.
The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-9076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-9084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00775b</identifier><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017-05</creationdate><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Islam, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortall, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekhail, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callender, S. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madkhali, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharwani, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayyash, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobernyk, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettig, S. D</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of counterions on the micellization and monolayer behaviour of cationic gemini surfactantsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00775b</title><description>The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior. This study included eight ethanediyl-α,ω-bis-(dimethylhexadecylammonium) gemini surfactants (GS, also known as 16-2-16) having counterions of chloride (Cl
−
), bromide (Br
−
), malate, tartrate, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), guanosine monophosphate (GMP), cytidine monophosphate (CMP), and uridine monophosphate (UMP). Tensiometry, conductivity and Langmuir monolayer measurements were performed to investigate the micellization and surface behaviour of each surfactant.
The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior.</description><issn>1463-9076</issn><issn>1463-9084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFj09LAzEQxYMoWKsX78J400NrQtqu9apb7KmHel9m04mN5M-SZAv1Y_kJXVbRg2BP85j33g8eY5eCjwWX8ztVqIbzopjWR2wgJjM5mvP7yfGPLman7CylN865mAo5YB-l1qQyBA0qtD5TNMEnCB7ylsAZRdaad8zdF9BvwAUfLO4pQk1b3JnQxr7bJ4yCV3LGG0ht1Kgy-pxK2_Fjb6a2aSw58hnjHozXIbov9E25Xt4C7tBYrC2NYU0ET6vlA_xdds5ONNpEF993yK4W5cvj8ygmVTXRuA5e_cblkF3_51fNRstDjE_OVG6Z</recordid><startdate>20170503</startdate><enddate>20170503</enddate><creator>Islam, M. S</creator><creator>Shortall, S. M</creator><creator>Mekhail, G. M</creator><creator>Callender, S. P</creator><creator>Madkhali, O</creator><creator>Bharwani, Z</creator><creator>Ayyash, D</creator><creator>Kobernyk, K</creator><creator>Wettig, S. D</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20170503</creationdate><title>Effect of counterions on the micellization and monolayer behaviour of cationic gemini surfactantsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00775b</title><author>Islam, M. S ; Shortall, S. M ; Mekhail, G. M ; Callender, S. P ; Madkhali, O ; Bharwani, Z ; Ayyash, D ; Kobernyk, K ; Wettig, S. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-rsc_primary_c7cp00775b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Islam, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortall, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekhail, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callender, S. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madkhali, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharwani, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayyash, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobernyk, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettig, S. D</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Islam, M. S</au><au>Shortall, S. M</au><au>Mekhail, G. M</au><au>Callender, S. P</au><au>Madkhali, O</au><au>Bharwani, Z</au><au>Ayyash, D</au><au>Kobernyk, K</au><au>Wettig, S. D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of counterions on the micellization and monolayer behaviour of cationic gemini surfactantsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00775b</atitle><date>2017-05-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>1825</spage><epage>1834</epage><pages>1825-1834</pages><issn>1463-9076</issn><eissn>1463-9084</eissn><abstract>The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior. This study included eight ethanediyl-α,ω-bis-(dimethylhexadecylammonium) gemini surfactants (GS, also known as 16-2-16) having counterions of chloride (Cl
−
), bromide (Br
−
), malate, tartrate, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), guanosine monophosphate (GMP), cytidine monophosphate (CMP), and uridine monophosphate (UMP). Tensiometry, conductivity and Langmuir monolayer measurements were performed to investigate the micellization and surface behaviour of each surfactant.
The effect of various inorganic and organic counterions on the aggregation behavior of gemini surfactants was examined to investigate the dominant influence of the anions on their micellization and aggregation behavior.</abstract><doi>10.1039/c7cp00775b</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-9076 |
ispartof | |
issn | 1463-9076 1463-9084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_rsc_primary_c7cp00775b |
source | Royal Society of Chemistry Journals |
title | Effect of counterions on the micellization and monolayer behaviour of cationic gemini surfactantsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7cp00775b |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rsc&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20counterions%20on%20the%20micellization%20and%20monolayer%20behaviour%20of%20cationic%20gemini%20surfactantsElectronic%20supplementary%20information%20(ESI)%20available.%20See%20DOI:%2010.1039/c7cp00775b&rft.au=Islam,%20M.%20S&rft.date=2017-05-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=1825&rft.epage=1834&rft.pages=1825-1834&rft.issn=1463-9076&rft.eissn=1463-9084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c7cp00775b&rft_dat=%3Crsc%3Ec7cp00775b%3C/rsc%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-rsc_primary_c7cp00775b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |