Loading…

Process-level modelling and optimization to evaluate metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion capture of CO

Many metal-organic framework (MOF) materials have been reported in the literature as promising for carbon capture applications based on isotherm data or simple adsorbent metrics. However, adsorption process conditions are often neglected in these evaluations. In this study, we performed process-leve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular systems design & engineering 2020-08, Vol.5 (7), p.125-1218
Main Authors: Yancy-Caballero, Daison, Leperi, Karson T, Bucior, Benjamin J, Richardson, Rachelle K, Islamoglu, Timur, Farha, Omar K, You, Fengqi, Snurr, Randall Q
Format: Article
Language:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c63d-ddafbc7b50eb2e5373e80f2cad188a14c864ceb538404c6cb24a4e5f95989c763
cites
container_end_page 1218
container_issue 7
container_start_page 125
container_title Molecular systems design & engineering
container_volume 5
creator Yancy-Caballero, Daison
Leperi, Karson T
Bucior, Benjamin J
Richardson, Rachelle K
Islamoglu, Timur
Farha, Omar K
You, Fengqi
Snurr, Randall Q
description Many metal-organic framework (MOF) materials have been reported in the literature as promising for carbon capture applications based on isotherm data or simple adsorbent metrics. However, adsorption process conditions are often neglected in these evaluations. In this study, we performed process-level simulation and optimization of pressure swing adsorption processes on a set of promising MOFs reported in the literature for post-combustion carbon capture. Zeolite 13X was also included as a benchmark material. We examined the ability of the MOFs to achieve the Department of Energy goals of 90% CO 2 purity and 90% CO 2 recovery by employing process-level optimization using three different cycle configurations: a modified Skarstrom cycle, a five-step cycle, and a fractionated vacuum swing adsorption cycle. Then, we ranked the MOFs based on their economic performance by looking at the productivity and energy requirements for each cycle. We compared this ranking of the MOFs with the rankings provided by other metrics and found that the adsorbent rankings suggested by simplified metrics may differ significantly from the rankings predicted by detailed process optimization. The economic optimization analysis suggests that the best performing MOFs from those analyzed here are UTSA-16, Cu-TDPAT, Zn-MOF-74, Ti-MIL-91, and SIFSIX-3-Ni. Looking at the connection between process performance and material properties, we found that high CO 2 working capacity, small pore size, and large difference between the heat of adsorption of CO 2 and N 2 promote CO 2 capture ability based on this small data set. We synthesized one of the top performing MOFs, SIFSIX-3-Ni, and measured its CO 2 and N 2 adsorption isotherms. The measured isotherms allowed us to estimate the N 2 heat of adsorption for SIFSIX-3-Ni, which was not previously available and was required for the process-level modelling. Process and economic optimization of several pressure swing adsorption cycles were carried out to rank promising metal-organic framework (MOF) materials for post combustion carbon capture.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d0me00060d
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rsc</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rsc_primary_d0me00060d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>d0me00060d</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c63d-ddafbc7b50eb2e5373e80f2cad188a14c864ceb538404c6cb24a4e5f95989c763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1KxDAURoMgOIyzcS_kBaJp06TpUop_MDAuZj_cJjdDNWlKko7o0ysquPrgwDmLj5Crit9UXHS3lgfknCtuz8iq5lKzTunugmxyfv3mldKqlmpF4kuKBnNmHk_oaYgWvR-nI4XJ0jiXMYyfUMY40RIpnsAvUJAGLOBZTEeYRkNdgoDvMb1l6mKic8yFmRiGJf-IBuayJKTR0X53Sc4d-Iybv12T_cP9vn9i293jc3-3ZUYJy6wFN5h2kByHGqVoBWruagO20hqqxmjVGByk0A1vjDJD3UCD0nWy051plViT699syuYwpzFA-jj8fyK-ABNpWhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process-level modelling and optimization to evaluate metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion capture of CO</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list)</source><creator>Yancy-Caballero, Daison ; Leperi, Karson T ; Bucior, Benjamin J ; Richardson, Rachelle K ; Islamoglu, Timur ; Farha, Omar K ; You, Fengqi ; Snurr, Randall Q</creator><creatorcontrib>Yancy-Caballero, Daison ; Leperi, Karson T ; Bucior, Benjamin J ; Richardson, Rachelle K ; Islamoglu, Timur ; Farha, Omar K ; You, Fengqi ; Snurr, Randall Q</creatorcontrib><description>Many metal-organic framework (MOF) materials have been reported in the literature as promising for carbon capture applications based on isotherm data or simple adsorbent metrics. However, adsorption process conditions are often neglected in these evaluations. In this study, we performed process-level simulation and optimization of pressure swing adsorption processes on a set of promising MOFs reported in the literature for post-combustion carbon capture. Zeolite 13X was also included as a benchmark material. We examined the ability of the MOFs to achieve the Department of Energy goals of 90% CO 2 purity and 90% CO 2 recovery by employing process-level optimization using three different cycle configurations: a modified Skarstrom cycle, a five-step cycle, and a fractionated vacuum swing adsorption cycle. Then, we ranked the MOFs based on their economic performance by looking at the productivity and energy requirements for each cycle. We compared this ranking of the MOFs with the rankings provided by other metrics and found that the adsorbent rankings suggested by simplified metrics may differ significantly from the rankings predicted by detailed process optimization. The economic optimization analysis suggests that the best performing MOFs from those analyzed here are UTSA-16, Cu-TDPAT, Zn-MOF-74, Ti-MIL-91, and SIFSIX-3-Ni. Looking at the connection between process performance and material properties, we found that high CO 2 working capacity, small pore size, and large difference between the heat of adsorption of CO 2 and N 2 promote CO 2 capture ability based on this small data set. We synthesized one of the top performing MOFs, SIFSIX-3-Ni, and measured its CO 2 and N 2 adsorption isotherms. The measured isotherms allowed us to estimate the N 2 heat of adsorption for SIFSIX-3-Ni, which was not previously available and was required for the process-level modelling. Process and economic optimization of several pressure swing adsorption cycles were carried out to rank promising metal-organic framework (MOF) materials for post combustion carbon capture.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2058-9689</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d0me00060d</identifier><ispartof>Molecular systems design &amp; engineering, 2020-08, Vol.5 (7), p.125-1218</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c63d-ddafbc7b50eb2e5373e80f2cad188a14c864ceb538404c6cb24a4e5f95989c763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yancy-Caballero, Daison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leperi, Karson T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucior, Benjamin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Rachelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islamoglu, Timur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farha, Omar K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Fengqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snurr, Randall Q</creatorcontrib><title>Process-level modelling and optimization to evaluate metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion capture of CO</title><title>Molecular systems design &amp; engineering</title><description>Many metal-organic framework (MOF) materials have been reported in the literature as promising for carbon capture applications based on isotherm data or simple adsorbent metrics. However, adsorption process conditions are often neglected in these evaluations. In this study, we performed process-level simulation and optimization of pressure swing adsorption processes on a set of promising MOFs reported in the literature for post-combustion carbon capture. Zeolite 13X was also included as a benchmark material. We examined the ability of the MOFs to achieve the Department of Energy goals of 90% CO 2 purity and 90% CO 2 recovery by employing process-level optimization using three different cycle configurations: a modified Skarstrom cycle, a five-step cycle, and a fractionated vacuum swing adsorption cycle. Then, we ranked the MOFs based on their economic performance by looking at the productivity and energy requirements for each cycle. We compared this ranking of the MOFs with the rankings provided by other metrics and found that the adsorbent rankings suggested by simplified metrics may differ significantly from the rankings predicted by detailed process optimization. The economic optimization analysis suggests that the best performing MOFs from those analyzed here are UTSA-16, Cu-TDPAT, Zn-MOF-74, Ti-MIL-91, and SIFSIX-3-Ni. Looking at the connection between process performance and material properties, we found that high CO 2 working capacity, small pore size, and large difference between the heat of adsorption of CO 2 and N 2 promote CO 2 capture ability based on this small data set. We synthesized one of the top performing MOFs, SIFSIX-3-Ni, and measured its CO 2 and N 2 adsorption isotherms. The measured isotherms allowed us to estimate the N 2 heat of adsorption for SIFSIX-3-Ni, which was not previously available and was required for the process-level modelling. Process and economic optimization of several pressure swing adsorption cycles were carried out to rank promising metal-organic framework (MOF) materials for post combustion carbon capture.</description><issn>2058-9689</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpFkM1KxDAURoMgOIyzcS_kBaJp06TpUop_MDAuZj_cJjdDNWlKko7o0ysquPrgwDmLj5Crit9UXHS3lgfknCtuz8iq5lKzTunugmxyfv3mldKqlmpF4kuKBnNmHk_oaYgWvR-nI4XJ0jiXMYyfUMY40RIpnsAvUJAGLOBZTEeYRkNdgoDvMb1l6mKic8yFmRiGJf-IBuayJKTR0X53Sc4d-Iybv12T_cP9vn9i293jc3-3ZUYJy6wFN5h2kByHGqVoBWruagO20hqqxmjVGByk0A1vjDJD3UCD0nWy051plViT699syuYwpzFA-jj8fyK-ABNpWhQ</recordid><startdate>20200817</startdate><enddate>20200817</enddate><creator>Yancy-Caballero, Daison</creator><creator>Leperi, Karson T</creator><creator>Bucior, Benjamin J</creator><creator>Richardson, Rachelle K</creator><creator>Islamoglu, Timur</creator><creator>Farha, Omar K</creator><creator>You, Fengqi</creator><creator>Snurr, Randall Q</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20200817</creationdate><title>Process-level modelling and optimization to evaluate metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion capture of CO</title><author>Yancy-Caballero, Daison ; Leperi, Karson T ; Bucior, Benjamin J ; Richardson, Rachelle K ; Islamoglu, Timur ; Farha, Omar K ; You, Fengqi ; Snurr, Randall Q</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c63d-ddafbc7b50eb2e5373e80f2cad188a14c864ceb538404c6cb24a4e5f95989c763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yancy-Caballero, Daison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leperi, Karson T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucior, Benjamin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Rachelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islamoglu, Timur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farha, Omar K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Fengqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snurr, Randall Q</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Molecular systems design &amp; engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yancy-Caballero, Daison</au><au>Leperi, Karson T</au><au>Bucior, Benjamin J</au><au>Richardson, Rachelle K</au><au>Islamoglu, Timur</au><au>Farha, Omar K</au><au>You, Fengqi</au><au>Snurr, Randall Q</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Process-level modelling and optimization to evaluate metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion capture of CO</atitle><jtitle>Molecular systems design &amp; engineering</jtitle><date>2020-08-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>1218</epage><pages>125-1218</pages><eissn>2058-9689</eissn><abstract>Many metal-organic framework (MOF) materials have been reported in the literature as promising for carbon capture applications based on isotherm data or simple adsorbent metrics. However, adsorption process conditions are often neglected in these evaluations. In this study, we performed process-level simulation and optimization of pressure swing adsorption processes on a set of promising MOFs reported in the literature for post-combustion carbon capture. Zeolite 13X was also included as a benchmark material. We examined the ability of the MOFs to achieve the Department of Energy goals of 90% CO 2 purity and 90% CO 2 recovery by employing process-level optimization using three different cycle configurations: a modified Skarstrom cycle, a five-step cycle, and a fractionated vacuum swing adsorption cycle. Then, we ranked the MOFs based on their economic performance by looking at the productivity and energy requirements for each cycle. We compared this ranking of the MOFs with the rankings provided by other metrics and found that the adsorbent rankings suggested by simplified metrics may differ significantly from the rankings predicted by detailed process optimization. The economic optimization analysis suggests that the best performing MOFs from those analyzed here are UTSA-16, Cu-TDPAT, Zn-MOF-74, Ti-MIL-91, and SIFSIX-3-Ni. Looking at the connection between process performance and material properties, we found that high CO 2 working capacity, small pore size, and large difference between the heat of adsorption of CO 2 and N 2 promote CO 2 capture ability based on this small data set. We synthesized one of the top performing MOFs, SIFSIX-3-Ni, and measured its CO 2 and N 2 adsorption isotherms. The measured isotherms allowed us to estimate the N 2 heat of adsorption for SIFSIX-3-Ni, which was not previously available and was required for the process-level modelling. Process and economic optimization of several pressure swing adsorption cycles were carried out to rank promising metal-organic framework (MOF) materials for post combustion carbon capture.</abstract><doi>10.1039/d0me00060d</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2058-9689
ispartof Molecular systems design & engineering, 2020-08, Vol.5 (7), p.125-1218
issn 2058-9689
language
recordid cdi_rsc_primary_d0me00060d
source Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list)
title Process-level modelling and optimization to evaluate metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion capture of CO
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rsc&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process-level%20modelling%20and%20optimization%20to%20evaluate%20metal-organic%20frameworks%20for%20post-combustion%20capture%20of%20CO&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20systems%20design%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Yancy-Caballero,%20Daison&rft.date=2020-08-17&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=1218&rft.pages=125-1218&rft.eissn=2058-9689&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d0me00060d&rft_dat=%3Crsc%3Ed0me00060d%3C/rsc%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c63d-ddafbc7b50eb2e5373e80f2cad188a14c864ceb538404c6cb24a4e5f95989c763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true