Loading…

Development of temperature criteria for marine discharge from a large industrial seawater supplies project in Western Australia

A multi-user industrial water supply system is under construction on the Burrup Peninsula in Western Australia, 1400 km north of Perth, to support a number of gas-processing plants that convert natural gas into ammonia, dimethyl-ether, methanol or liquid fuels. At full design capacity, the project w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water S. A. 2004-01, Vol.30 (5), p.100-106
Main Authors: Shackleton, Blair, Bath, Andrew, Botica, Chris
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 106
container_issue 5
container_start_page 100
container_title Water S. A.
container_volume 30
creator Shackleton, Blair
Bath, Andrew
Botica, Chris
description A multi-user industrial water supply system is under construction on the Burrup Peninsula in Western Australia, 1400 km north of Perth, to support a number of gas-processing plants that convert natural gas into ammonia, dimethyl-ether, methanol or liquid fuels. At full design capacity, the project will abstract 280 000 m3/day of seawater from King Bay. Seawater will be conveyed by pipeline to each processing plant and used for cooling (using evaporative systems) and process feed water (after desalination). The total return flow (comprising cooling tower blow-down and desalination concentrate) will amount to 210 000 m3/day. A pipeline collects the return flow from each industry and discharges into a submerged marine outfall in King Bay. As part of the project environmental approvals process, the Department of the Environment (DoE) prescribed discharge criteria for the temperature of the return flow entering King Bay. DoE requires the return flow, at the end of the outlet pipe, to be less than 2°C above the temperature of the intake (calculated over a 24-hour period and expressed as an 80 percentile). For the remainder (20% of the time), the return flow must not exceed 5°C above intake temperature. As more information from the project proponents became available, it was realised that industrial evaporative cooling systems could not comply with the temperature criteria proposed by DoE under certain climatic conditions. Key findings of this study show: the DoE temperature limits proposed in the Ministerial Condition are too stringent, practical design of evaporative cooling systems on the Burrup will yield a discharge of 6°C above intake temperature, discharge at 6°C will not influence the biota in proximity to the diffuser or the corals located 700 m from the diffuser, marine organisms in King Bay are exposed and tolerant to large natural variations in seawater temperature, relaxation of the return flow temperature from 2 to 6°C (above intake) will not influence the biota of King Bay, and environmental management systems are being developed to monitor and manage the temperature of the return flow.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sabinet</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC116201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC116201</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>10520/EJC116201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC1162013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzbFuwjAQBmAPIEEp73ALI5ITUwgjAqqKGYkxOsIFHDmxdefA2Fevi3gAptOv__t1AzXWZlXMFytTjNSHSKN1bsxiPVa_O7qT86GlLoKvIVIbiDH2TFCxjcQWofYMLbLtCC5WqhvylaBm3wKCewbbXXqJyToQwgemHUgfgrMkENg3VMWE4ESSqg42_xqdxU81rNEJTV93ombf--P2Zy54Tv9iKUihP5eZ_sp1uT9ss2yZ68y86_4AGedQoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of temperature criteria for marine discharge from a large industrial seawater supplies project in Western Australia</title><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shackleton, Blair ; Bath, Andrew ; Botica, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Shackleton, Blair ; Bath, Andrew ; Botica, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>A multi-user industrial water supply system is under construction on the Burrup Peninsula in Western Australia, 1400 km north of Perth, to support a number of gas-processing plants that convert natural gas into ammonia, dimethyl-ether, methanol or liquid fuels. At full design capacity, the project will abstract 280 000 m3/day of seawater from King Bay. Seawater will be conveyed by pipeline to each processing plant and used for cooling (using evaporative systems) and process feed water (after desalination). The total return flow (comprising cooling tower blow-down and desalination concentrate) will amount to 210 000 m3/day. A pipeline collects the return flow from each industry and discharges into a submerged marine outfall in King Bay. As part of the project environmental approvals process, the Department of the Environment (DoE) prescribed discharge criteria for the temperature of the return flow entering King Bay. DoE requires the return flow, at the end of the outlet pipe, to be less than 2°C above the temperature of the intake (calculated over a 24-hour period and expressed as an 80 percentile). For the remainder (20% of the time), the return flow must not exceed 5°C above intake temperature. As more information from the project proponents became available, it was realised that industrial evaporative cooling systems could not comply with the temperature criteria proposed by DoE under certain climatic conditions. Key findings of this study show: the DoE temperature limits proposed in the Ministerial Condition are too stringent, practical design of evaporative cooling systems on the Burrup will yield a discharge of 6°C above intake temperature, discharge at 6°C will not influence the biota in proximity to the diffuser or the corals located 700 m from the diffuser, marine organisms in King Bay are exposed and tolerant to large natural variations in seawater temperature, relaxation of the return flow temperature from 2 to 6°C (above intake) will not influence the biota of King Bay, and environmental management systems are being developed to monitor and manage the temperature of the return flow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><ispartof>Water S. A., 2004-01, Vol.30 (5), p.100-106</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shackleton, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bath, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botica, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Development of temperature criteria for marine discharge from a large industrial seawater supplies project in Western Australia</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>A multi-user industrial water supply system is under construction on the Burrup Peninsula in Western Australia, 1400 km north of Perth, to support a number of gas-processing plants that convert natural gas into ammonia, dimethyl-ether, methanol or liquid fuels. At full design capacity, the project will abstract 280 000 m3/day of seawater from King Bay. Seawater will be conveyed by pipeline to each processing plant and used for cooling (using evaporative systems) and process feed water (after desalination). The total return flow (comprising cooling tower blow-down and desalination concentrate) will amount to 210 000 m3/day. A pipeline collects the return flow from each industry and discharges into a submerged marine outfall in King Bay. As part of the project environmental approvals process, the Department of the Environment (DoE) prescribed discharge criteria for the temperature of the return flow entering King Bay. DoE requires the return flow, at the end of the outlet pipe, to be less than 2°C above the temperature of the intake (calculated over a 24-hour period and expressed as an 80 percentile). For the remainder (20% of the time), the return flow must not exceed 5°C above intake temperature. As more information from the project proponents became available, it was realised that industrial evaporative cooling systems could not comply with the temperature criteria proposed by DoE under certain climatic conditions. Key findings of this study show: the DoE temperature limits proposed in the Ministerial Condition are too stringent, practical design of evaporative cooling systems on the Burrup will yield a discharge of 6°C above intake temperature, discharge at 6°C will not influence the biota in proximity to the diffuser or the corals located 700 m from the diffuser, marine organisms in King Bay are exposed and tolerant to large natural variations in seawater temperature, relaxation of the return flow temperature from 2 to 6°C (above intake) will not influence the biota of King Bay, and environmental management systems are being developed to monitor and manage the temperature of the return flow.</description><issn>0378-4738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNzbFuwjAQBmAPIEEp73ALI5ITUwgjAqqKGYkxOsIFHDmxdefA2Fevi3gAptOv__t1AzXWZlXMFytTjNSHSKN1bsxiPVa_O7qT86GlLoKvIVIbiDH2TFCxjcQWofYMLbLtCC5WqhvylaBm3wKCewbbXXqJyToQwgemHUgfgrMkENg3VMWE4ESSqg42_xqdxU81rNEJTV93ombf--P2Zy54Tv9iKUihP5eZ_sp1uT9ss2yZ68y86_4AGedQoQ</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Shackleton, Blair</creator><creator>Bath, Andrew</creator><creator>Botica, Chris</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Development of temperature criteria for marine discharge from a large industrial seawater supplies project in Western Australia</title><author>Shackleton, Blair ; Bath, Andrew ; Botica, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC1162013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shackleton, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bath, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botica, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shackleton, Blair</au><au>Bath, Andrew</au><au>Botica, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of temperature criteria for marine discharge from a large industrial seawater supplies project in Western Australia</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>100-106</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><abstract>A multi-user industrial water supply system is under construction on the Burrup Peninsula in Western Australia, 1400 km north of Perth, to support a number of gas-processing plants that convert natural gas into ammonia, dimethyl-ether, methanol or liquid fuels. At full design capacity, the project will abstract 280 000 m3/day of seawater from King Bay. Seawater will be conveyed by pipeline to each processing plant and used for cooling (using evaporative systems) and process feed water (after desalination). The total return flow (comprising cooling tower blow-down and desalination concentrate) will amount to 210 000 m3/day. A pipeline collects the return flow from each industry and discharges into a submerged marine outfall in King Bay. As part of the project environmental approvals process, the Department of the Environment (DoE) prescribed discharge criteria for the temperature of the return flow entering King Bay. DoE requires the return flow, at the end of the outlet pipe, to be less than 2°C above the temperature of the intake (calculated over a 24-hour period and expressed as an 80 percentile). For the remainder (20% of the time), the return flow must not exceed 5°C above intake temperature. As more information from the project proponents became available, it was realised that industrial evaporative cooling systems could not comply with the temperature criteria proposed by DoE under certain climatic conditions. Key findings of this study show: the DoE temperature limits proposed in the Ministerial Condition are too stringent, practical design of evaporative cooling systems on the Burrup will yield a discharge of 6°C above intake temperature, discharge at 6°C will not influence the biota in proximity to the diffuser or the corals located 700 m from the diffuser, marine organisms in King Bay are exposed and tolerant to large natural variations in seawater temperature, relaxation of the return flow temperature from 2 to 6°C (above intake) will not influence the biota of King Bay, and environmental management systems are being developed to monitor and manage the temperature of the return flow.</abstract><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4738
ispartof Water S. A., 2004-01, Vol.30 (5), p.100-106
issn 0378-4738
language eng
recordid cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC116201
source Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title Development of temperature criteria for marine discharge from a large industrial seawater supplies project in Western Australia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A30%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sabinet&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20temperature%20criteria%20for%20marine%20discharge%20from%20a%20large%20industrial%20seawater%20supplies%20project%20in%20Western%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Shackleton,%20Blair&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=100-106&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Csabinet%3E10520/EJC116201%3C/sabinet%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC1162013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC116201&rfr_iscdi=true