Loading…

Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts

The head, neck and trunk kinematic responses of four volunteer test subjects, recorded during a series of experimental low velocity motor vehicle collisions, have been measured and analyzed. Using data obtained from multiple high speed film, video and electronic accelerometer measurements of the tes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McConnell, Whitman E, Howard, Richard P, Guzman, Herbert M, Bomar, John B, Raddin, James H, Benedict, James V, Smith, Harry L, Hatsell, Charles P
Format: Report
Language:English
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator McConnell, Whitman E
Howard, Richard P
Guzman, Herbert M
Bomar, John B
Raddin, James H
Benedict, James V
Smith, Harry L
Hatsell, Charles P
description The head, neck and trunk kinematic responses of four volunteer test subjects, recorded during a series of experimental low velocity motor vehicle collisions, have been measured and analyzed. Using data obtained from multiple high speed film, video and electronic accelerometer measurements of the test subjects, it was found that the actual kinematic responses of the human head, neck and trunk that occur during low velocity rearend collisions are more complex than previously thought. Our findings indicate that the time-honored description of the cervical “whiplash” response is both incomplete and inaccurate. Although the classic “whiplash” neck response to rearend collisions and the widely accepted hyperextension/hyperflexion cervical injury mechanism have been extensively written and speculated about, there have been little human experimental data available, especially for low velocity collisions. Low velocity collisions are defined in this report as motor vehicle collisions in which the impact related change of the rearended vehicle's velocity (AV) is about 12.9 kph (8 mph) or less. Throughout nearly 4 decades of experimental crash testing, low velocity mishaps (as defined above) have been felt to have a minor injury causation potential and have remained a relatively unstudied area. The absence of good experimental data, accurately defining real occupant kinematic response during this common type of traffic accident has spawned a plethora of divergent concepts, ideas and speculation about possible injury mechanisms. In February 1991, a series of vehicle collision tests using fully instrumented volunteer human test subject/drivers and a Hybrid III manikin passenger was conducted, utilizing local testing facilities. This project was undertaken to better define human, dummy and vehicle responses during low velocity collisions.
doi_str_mv 10.4271/930889
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sae_ABANM</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sae_technicalpapers_930889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>930889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-sae_technicalpapers_9308893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjsuKwjAUQIOMYMfHN1w_oGPS1jZdiiiKrlTcyjXeYqRNijci_r3CzAfM6izOWRwhRkr-ZEmhJmUqtS47IkpyreM0T4ovEUmV6bhQpeqJb-ablKmaFlkk9jOH9Ystg69g9WjQwYE4wP5xvpEJsLGOGgzWwI649Y6JIXjY-iccqfbGhtfH4B0W7gLrpkUTeCC6FdZMwz_2xXi5OMxXMSOdApmrswbrFlu68-n3Nv1P8wZhL0L1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts</title><source>SAE Technical Papers, Back File A (1990 - 1997)</source><creator>McConnell, Whitman E ; Howard, Richard P ; Guzman, Herbert M ; Bomar, John B ; Raddin, James H ; Benedict, James V ; Smith, Harry L ; Hatsell, Charles P</creator><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Whitman E ; Howard, Richard P ; Guzman, Herbert M ; Bomar, John B ; Raddin, James H ; Benedict, James V ; Smith, Harry L ; Hatsell, Charles P</creatorcontrib><description>The head, neck and trunk kinematic responses of four volunteer test subjects, recorded during a series of experimental low velocity motor vehicle collisions, have been measured and analyzed. Using data obtained from multiple high speed film, video and electronic accelerometer measurements of the test subjects, it was found that the actual kinematic responses of the human head, neck and trunk that occur during low velocity rearend collisions are more complex than previously thought. Our findings indicate that the time-honored description of the cervical “whiplash” response is both incomplete and inaccurate. Although the classic “whiplash” neck response to rearend collisions and the widely accepted hyperextension/hyperflexion cervical injury mechanism have been extensively written and speculated about, there have been little human experimental data available, especially for low velocity collisions. Low velocity collisions are defined in this report as motor vehicle collisions in which the impact related change of the rearended vehicle's velocity (AV) is about 12.9 kph (8 mph) or less. Throughout nearly 4 decades of experimental crash testing, low velocity mishaps (as defined above) have been felt to have a minor injury causation potential and have remained a relatively unstudied area. The absence of good experimental data, accurately defining real occupant kinematic response during this common type of traffic accident has spawned a plethora of divergent concepts, ideas and speculation about possible injury mechanisms. In February 1991, a series of vehicle collision tests using fully instrumented volunteer human test subject/drivers and a Hybrid III manikin passenger was conducted, utilizing local testing facilities. This project was undertaken to better define human, dummy and vehicle responses during low velocity collisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-3627</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4271/930889</identifier><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.4271/930889$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsae$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,26341,27925,79483,79486</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.4271/930889$$EView_record_in_SAE_Mobilus$$FView_record_in_$$GSAE_Mobilus</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Whitman E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Herbert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomar, John B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raddin, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Harry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatsell, Charles P</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts</title><description>The head, neck and trunk kinematic responses of four volunteer test subjects, recorded during a series of experimental low velocity motor vehicle collisions, have been measured and analyzed. Using data obtained from multiple high speed film, video and electronic accelerometer measurements of the test subjects, it was found that the actual kinematic responses of the human head, neck and trunk that occur during low velocity rearend collisions are more complex than previously thought. Our findings indicate that the time-honored description of the cervical “whiplash” response is both incomplete and inaccurate. Although the classic “whiplash” neck response to rearend collisions and the widely accepted hyperextension/hyperflexion cervical injury mechanism have been extensively written and speculated about, there have been little human experimental data available, especially for low velocity collisions. Low velocity collisions are defined in this report as motor vehicle collisions in which the impact related change of the rearended vehicle's velocity (AV) is about 12.9 kph (8 mph) or less. Throughout nearly 4 decades of experimental crash testing, low velocity mishaps (as defined above) have been felt to have a minor injury causation potential and have remained a relatively unstudied area. The absence of good experimental data, accurately defining real occupant kinematic response during this common type of traffic accident has spawned a plethora of divergent concepts, ideas and speculation about possible injury mechanisms. In February 1991, a series of vehicle collision tests using fully instrumented volunteer human test subject/drivers and a Hybrid III manikin passenger was conducted, utilizing local testing facilities. This project was undertaken to better define human, dummy and vehicle responses during low velocity collisions.</description><issn>0148-7191</issn><issn>2688-3627</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>ABANM</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjsuKwjAUQIOMYMfHN1w_oGPS1jZdiiiKrlTcyjXeYqRNijci_r3CzAfM6izOWRwhRkr-ZEmhJmUqtS47IkpyreM0T4ovEUmV6bhQpeqJb-ablKmaFlkk9jOH9Ystg69g9WjQwYE4wP5xvpEJsLGOGgzWwI649Y6JIXjY-iccqfbGhtfH4B0W7gLrpkUTeCC6FdZMwz_2xXi5OMxXMSOdApmrswbrFlu68-n3Nv1P8wZhL0L1</recordid><startdate>19930301</startdate><enddate>19930301</enddate><creator>McConnell, Whitman E</creator><creator>Howard, Richard P</creator><creator>Guzman, Herbert M</creator><creator>Bomar, John B</creator><creator>Raddin, James H</creator><creator>Benedict, James V</creator><creator>Smith, Harry L</creator><creator>Hatsell, Charles P</creator><scope>ABANM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930301</creationdate><title>Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts</title><author>McConnell, Whitman E ; Howard, Richard P ; Guzman, Herbert M ; Bomar, John B ; Raddin, James H ; Benedict, James V ; Smith, Harry L ; Hatsell, Charles P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-sae_technicalpapers_9308893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Whitman E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Herbert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomar, John B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raddin, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Harry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatsell, Charles P</creatorcontrib><collection>SAE Technical Papers, Back File A (1990 - 1997)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McConnell, Whitman E</au><au>Howard, Richard P</au><au>Guzman, Herbert M</au><au>Bomar, John B</au><au>Raddin, James H</au><au>Benedict, James V</au><au>Smith, Harry L</au><au>Hatsell, Charles P</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts</btitle><date>1993-03-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><issn>0148-7191</issn><eissn>2688-3627</eissn><abstract>The head, neck and trunk kinematic responses of four volunteer test subjects, recorded during a series of experimental low velocity motor vehicle collisions, have been measured and analyzed. Using data obtained from multiple high speed film, video and electronic accelerometer measurements of the test subjects, it was found that the actual kinematic responses of the human head, neck and trunk that occur during low velocity rearend collisions are more complex than previously thought. Our findings indicate that the time-honored description of the cervical “whiplash” response is both incomplete and inaccurate. Although the classic “whiplash” neck response to rearend collisions and the widely accepted hyperextension/hyperflexion cervical injury mechanism have been extensively written and speculated about, there have been little human experimental data available, especially for low velocity collisions. Low velocity collisions are defined in this report as motor vehicle collisions in which the impact related change of the rearended vehicle's velocity (AV) is about 12.9 kph (8 mph) or less. Throughout nearly 4 decades of experimental crash testing, low velocity mishaps (as defined above) have been felt to have a minor injury causation potential and have remained a relatively unstudied area. The absence of good experimental data, accurately defining real occupant kinematic response during this common type of traffic accident has spawned a plethora of divergent concepts, ideas and speculation about possible injury mechanisms. In February 1991, a series of vehicle collision tests using fully instrumented volunteer human test subject/drivers and a Hybrid III manikin passenger was conducted, utilizing local testing facilities. This project was undertaken to better define human, dummy and vehicle responses during low velocity collisions.</abstract><doi>10.4271/930889</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0148-7191
ispartof
issn 0148-7191
2688-3627
language eng
recordid cdi_sae_technicalpapers_930889
source SAE Technical Papers, Back File A (1990 - 1997)
title Analysis of Human Test Subject Kinematic Responses to Low Velocity Rear End Impacts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sae_ABANM&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Analysis%20of%20Human%20Test%20Subject%20Kinematic%20Responses%20to%20Low%20Velocity%20Rear%20End%20Impacts&rft.au=McConnell,%20Whitman%20E&rft.date=1993-03-01&rft.issn=0148-7191&rft.eissn=2688-3627&rft_id=info:doi/10.4271/930889&rft_dat=%3Csae_ABANM%3E930889%3C/sae_ABANM%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-sae_technicalpapers_9308893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true