Loading…
Case Studies in Animation Foundation
The foundations for animation are examined in light of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. In this case the Frye general acceptance rule was rejected by the Supreme Court. The result is that the foundations for scientific testimony have again come under debate, which means that animations wi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | McLay, Richard W Kiely, Stephen J Sheehan, Maura L |
description | The foundations for animation are examined in light of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. In this case the Frye general acceptance rule was rejected by the Supreme Court. The result is that the foundations for scientific testimony have again come under debate, which means that animations will be judged under new criteria. Several case studies are presented in view of this new precedent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4271/940920 |
format | report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sae_ABANM</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sae_technicalpapers_940920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>940920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-sae_technicalpapers_9409203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUsKwjAUAB-iYPydIYLbaH426VKKpXvdl9BGjNS0-NL7C-oBXM0sBgZgI_heSyMOuea55BMgMrOWqUyaKRAutGVG5GIOC8QH50ocjSawKxx6ekljGzzSEOkphqdLoY-07MfYfnQFs5vr0K9_XMK2PF-LiqHzdfLNPYbGdYMb_Avr717907wBrDQx2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Case Studies in Animation Foundation</title><source>SAE Technical Papers, Back File A (1990 - 1997)</source><creator>McLay, Richard W ; Kiely, Stephen J ; Sheehan, Maura L</creator><creatorcontrib>McLay, Richard W ; Kiely, Stephen J ; Sheehan, Maura L</creatorcontrib><description>The foundations for animation are examined in light of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. In this case the Frye general acceptance rule was rejected by the Supreme Court. The result is that the foundations for scientific testimony have again come under debate, which means that animations will be judged under new criteria. Several case studies are presented in view of this new precedent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-3627</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4271/940920</identifier><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><rights>Copyright 1994 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.4271/940920$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsae$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,26341,27925,79355,79358</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.4271/940920$$EView_record_in_SAE_Mobilus$$FView_record_in_$$GSAE_Mobilus</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLay, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiely, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Maura L</creatorcontrib><title>Case Studies in Animation Foundation</title><description>The foundations for animation are examined in light of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. In this case the Frye general acceptance rule was rejected by the Supreme Court. The result is that the foundations for scientific testimony have again come under debate, which means that animations will be judged under new criteria. Several case studies are presented in view of this new precedent.</description><issn>0148-7191</issn><issn>2688-3627</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>ABANM</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUsKwjAUAB-iYPydIYLbaH426VKKpXvdl9BGjNS0-NL7C-oBXM0sBgZgI_heSyMOuea55BMgMrOWqUyaKRAutGVG5GIOC8QH50ocjSawKxx6ekljGzzSEOkphqdLoY-07MfYfnQFs5vr0K9_XMK2PF-LiqHzdfLNPYbGdYMb_Avr717907wBrDQx2w</recordid><startdate>19940301</startdate><enddate>19940301</enddate><creator>McLay, Richard W</creator><creator>Kiely, Stephen J</creator><creator>Sheehan, Maura L</creator><scope>ABANM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940301</creationdate><title>Case Studies in Animation Foundation</title><author>McLay, Richard W ; Kiely, Stephen J ; Sheehan, Maura L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-sae_technicalpapers_9409203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLay, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiely, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Maura L</creatorcontrib><collection>SAE Technical Papers, Back File A (1990 - 1997)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLay, Richard W</au><au>Kiely, Stephen J</au><au>Sheehan, Maura L</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Case Studies in Animation Foundation</btitle><date>1994-03-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><issn>0148-7191</issn><eissn>2688-3627</eissn><abstract>The foundations for animation are examined in light of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. In this case the Frye general acceptance rule was rejected by the Supreme Court. The result is that the foundations for scientific testimony have again come under debate, which means that animations will be judged under new criteria. Several case studies are presented in view of this new precedent.</abstract><doi>10.4271/940920</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-7191 |
ispartof | |
issn | 0148-7191 2688-3627 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_sae_technicalpapers_940920 |
source | SAE Technical Papers, Back File A (1990 - 1997) |
title | Case Studies in Animation Foundation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A25%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sae_ABANM&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Case%20Studies%20in%20Animation%20Foundation&rft.au=McLay,%20Richard%20W&rft.date=1994-03-01&rft.issn=0148-7191&rft.eissn=2688-3627&rft_id=info:doi/10.4271/940920&rft_dat=%3Csae_ABANM%3E940920%3C/sae_ABANM%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-sae_technicalpapers_9409203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |