Loading…
Interim Pricing of Local Loop Unbundling in Ireland: Epilogue
In an earlier article, we presented a case study of local loop unbundling (LLU) in the Republic of Ireland in 2001. We explained how the predecessor regulatory body to the Irish Commission for Communications Regulation (Comreg) could select the least arbitrary interim access rate. This article is an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of network industries 2003-06, Vol.os-4 (2), p.119-135 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In an earlier article, we presented a case study of local loop unbundling (LLU)
in the Republic of Ireland in 2001. We explained how the predecessor regulatory
body to the Irish Commission for Communications Regulation (Comreg) could select
the least arbitrary interim access rate. This article is an epilogue to the
unfolding LLU experiment in Ireland. We provide assess the approach advocated by
the Industry Advisory Group (IAG), which was appointed by Comreg to resolve the
access-pricing dispute between the incumbent, eircom, and the regulator. The IAG
does not provide factual support for its assertions that the low digital
subscriber line (DSL) penetration and subscription rates in Ireland result from
market failure – that is, that eircom is restricting supply of DSL service. Nor
does the IAG provide factual support for its presumption that DSL service
represents a distinct product market under standard tools for competitive
analysis. Assuming, counterfactually, that the factual basis for such regulatory
intervention exists, we articulate the problem confronting Comreg: to estimate
the ratio of a variable for which Comreg believes it has very good information
(eircom's historical costs) to a variable for which it has no information
(eircom's long-run average incremental cost, or “LRAIC”). The IAG's solution
cannot inform Comreg of this relationship. The IAG suggests that, after
arbitrarily excluding the three countries with the highest LRAICs, eircom should
make its unbundled loops available at a price within the range of the remaining
LRAICs in the truncated sample. A more principled approach would be to estimate
the ratio of historical costs to LRAIC from other countries and then to apply
that ratio to eircom's historical costs. Alternatively, one would estimate in a
regression model the relationship between LRAIC and the economic and demographic
factors that influence LRAIC. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1389-9597 2507-0681 |
DOI: | 10.1177/178359170300400201 |