Loading…

Telemedicine’s Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Efficiency in a Pediatric Plastic Surgery Practice

Background: For decades, clinicians have cited telemedicine as a useful and effective tool for delivering care in surgical specialties. This study aims to investigate the direct impact of telemedicine on a pediatric plastic surgery practice, examining patient satisfaction and visit efficiency. Metho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:FACE 2024-12, Vol.5 (4), p.559-565
Main Authors: LaValley, Myles N., Wright, Matthew A., Nelson, Ronald, Kreber, Lily, Bogue, Jarrod T., Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 565
container_issue 4
container_start_page 559
container_title FACE
container_volume 5
creator LaValley, Myles N.
Wright, Matthew A.
Nelson, Ronald
Kreber, Lily
Bogue, Jarrod T.
Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.
description Background: For decades, clinicians have cited telemedicine as a useful and effective tool for delivering care in surgical specialties. This study aims to investigate the direct impact of telemedicine on a pediatric plastic surgery practice, examining patient satisfaction and visit efficiency. Methods: Between March 2020 and May 2021, patient families were surveyed online regarding their visit, with questions surrounding convenience, ease of communication, ability to demonstrate physical exam findings, and likelihood of recommending the encounter format. Responses were compared between in-person and telemedicine visits. The duration of encounters during the study time period was also documented from the electronic medical record. Results: Ninety families (15.1%) completed the survey. Telemedicine visits were rated as more convenient than in-person visits (3.77 ± 0.51 vs 3.36 ± 0.94, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/27325016241278660
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_27325016241278660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_27325016241278660</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_27325016241278660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-496a5901a0a0dc1bd50305aba6985c4ada26d55a6baad4b0db78f069b96198b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM9KAzEQh4MoWGofwFteYGtmN8nuHqVULRRcaD0vk38l0qaySQ-9-Rq-nk9iFnsQPH3Dx_xm4EfIPbA5QF0_lHVVCgay5FDWjZTsikxGV4zy-s98S2YxesU4VACSVxPitnZvD9Z47YP9_vyKdHX4QJ3oMdAOk7ch0U1mdFn6LDEYunQu79ugz9RnQ7ucxzR4Tbs9xpS5OQ07O5xpN4wxbe_IjcN9tLMLp-TtabldvBTr1-fV4nFdaJAyFbyVKFoGyJAZDcoIVjGBCmXbCM3RYCmNECgVouGKGVU3jslWtRLaRvFqSua_dyPubP9-PA0hv-uB9WNR_b-iqh-ldVxq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telemedicine’s Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Efficiency in a Pediatric Plastic Surgery Practice</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>LaValley, Myles N. ; Wright, Matthew A. ; Nelson, Ronald ; Kreber, Lily ; Bogue, Jarrod T. ; Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>LaValley, Myles N. ; Wright, Matthew A. ; Nelson, Ronald ; Kreber, Lily ; Bogue, Jarrod T. ; Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: For decades, clinicians have cited telemedicine as a useful and effective tool for delivering care in surgical specialties. This study aims to investigate the direct impact of telemedicine on a pediatric plastic surgery practice, examining patient satisfaction and visit efficiency. Methods: Between March 2020 and May 2021, patient families were surveyed online regarding their visit, with questions surrounding convenience, ease of communication, ability to demonstrate physical exam findings, and likelihood of recommending the encounter format. Responses were compared between in-person and telemedicine visits. The duration of encounters during the study time period was also documented from the electronic medical record. Results: Ninety families (15.1%) completed the survey. Telemedicine visits were rated as more convenient than in-person visits (3.77 ± 0.51 vs 3.36 ± 0.94, P &lt; .001). The ability to communicate in telemedicine was rated as similar to in-person (P = .104), as was the likelihood to recommend that format (P = .189). Quality of the physical exam was rated as worse for the telehealth visits (3.37 ± 0.89 vs 3.89 ± 0.35, P &lt; .001). Of telemedicine participants, 7.5% also described connectivity issues and 3.8% reported audiovisual problems. Regarding visit efficiency, telehealth visits were shorter across all encounter types including follow-up (34.3 ± 81.1 vs 55.7 ± 44.1 minutes, P = .01), new patient (29.3 ± 25.5 vs 65.1 ± 43.4 minutes, P &lt; .001), and postoperative (24.9 ± 22.9 vs 61.3 ± 48.8 minutes, P &lt; .001) visits. Conclusion: Telemedicine provides an excellent modality for care delivery in the pediatric plastic surgery setting, minimizing time and inconveniences associated with presenting in-person. However, there remains clear concern about the efficacy of the physical examination and technological reliability from the patient’s perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2732-5016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-5016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/27325016241278660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>FACE, 2024-12, Vol.5 (4), p.559-565</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5623-6085</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,79113</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LaValley, Myles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreber, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogue, Jarrod T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Telemedicine’s Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Efficiency in a Pediatric Plastic Surgery Practice</title><title>FACE</title><description>Background: For decades, clinicians have cited telemedicine as a useful and effective tool for delivering care in surgical specialties. This study aims to investigate the direct impact of telemedicine on a pediatric plastic surgery practice, examining patient satisfaction and visit efficiency. Methods: Between March 2020 and May 2021, patient families were surveyed online regarding their visit, with questions surrounding convenience, ease of communication, ability to demonstrate physical exam findings, and likelihood of recommending the encounter format. Responses were compared between in-person and telemedicine visits. The duration of encounters during the study time period was also documented from the electronic medical record. Results: Ninety families (15.1%) completed the survey. Telemedicine visits were rated as more convenient than in-person visits (3.77 ± 0.51 vs 3.36 ± 0.94, P &lt; .001). The ability to communicate in telemedicine was rated as similar to in-person (P = .104), as was the likelihood to recommend that format (P = .189). Quality of the physical exam was rated as worse for the telehealth visits (3.37 ± 0.89 vs 3.89 ± 0.35, P &lt; .001). Of telemedicine participants, 7.5% also described connectivity issues and 3.8% reported audiovisual problems. Regarding visit efficiency, telehealth visits were shorter across all encounter types including follow-up (34.3 ± 81.1 vs 55.7 ± 44.1 minutes, P = .01), new patient (29.3 ± 25.5 vs 65.1 ± 43.4 minutes, P &lt; .001), and postoperative (24.9 ± 22.9 vs 61.3 ± 48.8 minutes, P &lt; .001) visits. Conclusion: Telemedicine provides an excellent modality for care delivery in the pediatric plastic surgery setting, minimizing time and inconveniences associated with presenting in-person. However, there remains clear concern about the efficacy of the physical examination and technological reliability from the patient’s perspective.</description><issn>2732-5016</issn><issn>2732-5016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNplkM9KAzEQh4MoWGofwFteYGtmN8nuHqVULRRcaD0vk38l0qaySQ-9-Rq-nk9iFnsQPH3Dx_xm4EfIPbA5QF0_lHVVCgay5FDWjZTsikxGV4zy-s98S2YxesU4VACSVxPitnZvD9Z47YP9_vyKdHX4QJ3oMdAOk7ch0U1mdFn6LDEYunQu79ugz9RnQ7ucxzR4Tbs9xpS5OQ07O5xpN4wxbe_IjcN9tLMLp-TtabldvBTr1-fV4nFdaJAyFbyVKFoGyJAZDcoIVjGBCmXbCM3RYCmNECgVouGKGVU3jslWtRLaRvFqSua_dyPubP9-PA0hv-uB9WNR_b-iqh-ldVxq</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>LaValley, Myles N.</creator><creator>Wright, Matthew A.</creator><creator>Nelson, Ronald</creator><creator>Kreber, Lily</creator><creator>Bogue, Jarrod T.</creator><creator>Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope/><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-6085</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Telemedicine’s Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Efficiency in a Pediatric Plastic Surgery Practice</title><author>LaValley, Myles N. ; Wright, Matthew A. ; Nelson, Ronald ; Kreber, Lily ; Bogue, Jarrod T. ; Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-496a5901a0a0dc1bd50305aba6985c4ada26d55a6baad4b0db78f069b96198b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LaValley, Myles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreber, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogue, Jarrod T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>FACE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LaValley, Myles N.</au><au>Wright, Matthew A.</au><au>Nelson, Ronald</au><au>Kreber, Lily</au><au>Bogue, Jarrod T.</au><au>Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telemedicine’s Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Efficiency in a Pediatric Plastic Surgery Practice</atitle><jtitle>FACE</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>559-565</pages><issn>2732-5016</issn><eissn>2732-5016</eissn><abstract>Background: For decades, clinicians have cited telemedicine as a useful and effective tool for delivering care in surgical specialties. This study aims to investigate the direct impact of telemedicine on a pediatric plastic surgery practice, examining patient satisfaction and visit efficiency. Methods: Between March 2020 and May 2021, patient families were surveyed online regarding their visit, with questions surrounding convenience, ease of communication, ability to demonstrate physical exam findings, and likelihood of recommending the encounter format. Responses were compared between in-person and telemedicine visits. The duration of encounters during the study time period was also documented from the electronic medical record. Results: Ninety families (15.1%) completed the survey. Telemedicine visits were rated as more convenient than in-person visits (3.77 ± 0.51 vs 3.36 ± 0.94, P &lt; .001). The ability to communicate in telemedicine was rated as similar to in-person (P = .104), as was the likelihood to recommend that format (P = .189). Quality of the physical exam was rated as worse for the telehealth visits (3.37 ± 0.89 vs 3.89 ± 0.35, P &lt; .001). Of telemedicine participants, 7.5% also described connectivity issues and 3.8% reported audiovisual problems. Regarding visit efficiency, telehealth visits were shorter across all encounter types including follow-up (34.3 ± 81.1 vs 55.7 ± 44.1 minutes, P = .01), new patient (29.3 ± 25.5 vs 65.1 ± 43.4 minutes, P &lt; .001), and postoperative (24.9 ± 22.9 vs 61.3 ± 48.8 minutes, P &lt; .001) visits. Conclusion: Telemedicine provides an excellent modality for care delivery in the pediatric plastic surgery setting, minimizing time and inconveniences associated with presenting in-person. However, there remains clear concern about the efficacy of the physical examination and technological reliability from the patient’s perspective.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/27325016241278660</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-6085</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2732-5016
ispartof FACE, 2024-12, Vol.5 (4), p.559-565
issn 2732-5016
2732-5016
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_27325016241278660
source SAGE
title Telemedicine’s Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Efficiency in a Pediatric Plastic Surgery Practice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telemedicine%E2%80%99s%20Impact%20on%20Patient%20Satisfaction%20and%20Efficiency%20in%20a%20Pediatric%20Plastic%20Surgery%20Practice&rft.jtitle=FACE&rft.au=LaValley,%20Myles%20N.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=559-565&rft.issn=2732-5016&rft.eissn=2732-5016&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/27325016241278660&rft_dat=%3Csage%3E10.1177_27325016241278660%3C/sage%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-496a5901a0a0dc1bd50305aba6985c4ada26d55a6baad4b0db78f069b96198b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_27325016241278660&rfr_iscdi=true