Loading…
Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat
The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición 2013-06, Vol.63 (2), p.180-187 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 187 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Imran, Samra Hussain, Zaib Ghafoor, Farkhanda Nagra, Saeedahmad Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal |
description | The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm). |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0004_06222013000200010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0004_06222013000200010</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>1537183495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p250t-f3bac6661d4c81d4918df361492ab738d1f24d142fa9ea34f4b87abb1b02b6ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMlOwzAQzQFEy_ILKEcuQd6yHVHFJlXiAJwtL-PWVRIH2yn073FokWbmaUbvzWjeWbZECLECVYQssssQdggR1jbNRbZISBmqy2UmVq4fhRfR7iEHY6yyMKhD7kyurTHgYYh5D3HrdJiHm26KMOTwE71Q0boht3Nou4HBTSHfC28hWvgjf29BxOvs3IguwM0Jr7LPp8eP1Uuxfnt-XT2si5GUKBaGSqGqqsKaqSaVFjfa0AqzlghZ00ZjQ5jGjBjRgqDMMNnUQkosEZEVKHqV3R_3hvRC5_jOTX5IB_n7bAOfbSAI09SQlBglwd1RMHr3NUGIvLdBQdeJAdIrHJe0xg1lbZmotyfqJHvQfPS2F_7A_32kv5vPbOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537183495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Imran, Samra ; Hussain, Zaib ; Ghafoor, Farkhanda ; Nagra, Saeedahmad ; Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creator><creatorcontrib>Imran, Samra ; Hussain, Zaib ; Ghafoor, Farkhanda ; Nagra, Saeedahmad ; Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0622</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24934075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Venezuela: Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición</publisher><subject>Chemical Fractionation - methods ; Food Analysis - methods ; Food Handling - methods ; Glutens - isolation & purification ; NUTRITION & DIETETICS ; Triticum - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición, 2013-06, Vol.63 (2), p.180-187</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,37012</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24934075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imran, Samra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Zaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagra, Saeedahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</title><title>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición</title><addtitle>Arch Latinoam Nutr</addtitle><description>The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm).</description><subject>Chemical Fractionation - methods</subject><subject>Food Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Glutens - isolation & purification</subject><subject>NUTRITION & DIETETICS</subject><subject>Triticum - chemistry</subject><issn>0004-0622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1UMlOwzAQzQFEy_ILKEcuQd6yHVHFJlXiAJwtL-PWVRIH2yn073FokWbmaUbvzWjeWbZECLECVYQssssQdggR1jbNRbZISBmqy2UmVq4fhRfR7iEHY6yyMKhD7kyurTHgYYh5D3HrdJiHm26KMOTwE71Q0boht3Nou4HBTSHfC28hWvgjf29BxOvs3IguwM0Jr7LPp8eP1Uuxfnt-XT2si5GUKBaGSqGqqsKaqSaVFjfa0AqzlghZ00ZjQ5jGjBjRgqDMMNnUQkosEZEVKHqV3R_3hvRC5_jOTX5IB_n7bAOfbSAI09SQlBglwd1RMHr3NUGIvLdBQdeJAdIrHJe0xg1lbZmotyfqJHvQfPS2F_7A_32kv5vPbOQ</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Imran, Samra</creator><creator>Hussain, Zaib</creator><creator>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</creator><creator>Nagra, Saeedahmad</creator><creator>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creator><general>Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>RSQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</title><author>Imran, Samra ; Hussain, Zaib ; Ghafoor, Farkhanda ; Nagra, Saeedahmad ; Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p250t-f3bac6661d4c81d4918df361492ab738d1f24d142fa9ea34f4b87abb1b02b6ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Chemical Fractionation - methods</topic><topic>Food Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Glutens - isolation & purification</topic><topic>NUTRITION & DIETETICS</topic><topic>Triticum - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imran, Samra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Zaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagra, Saeedahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imran, Samra</au><au>Hussain, Zaib</au><au>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</au><au>Nagra, Saeedahmad</au><au>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</atitle><jtitle>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Latinoam Nutr</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>180-187</pages><issn>0004-0622</issn><abstract>The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm).</abstract><cop>Venezuela</cop><pub>Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición</pub><pmid>24934075</pmid><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0622 |
ispartof | Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición, 2013-06, Vol.63 (2), p.180-187 |
issn | 0004-0622 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0004_06222013000200010 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Chemical Fractionation - methods Food Analysis - methods Food Handling - methods Glutens - isolation & purification NUTRITION & DIETETICS Triticum - chemistry |
title | Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A47%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20efficiency%20of%20different%20methods%20of%20gluten%20extraction%20in%20indigenous%20varieties%20of%20wheat&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20latinoamericanos%20de%20nutrici%C3%B3n&rft.au=Imran,%20Samra&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=180-187&rft.issn=0004-0622&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E1537183495%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p250t-f3bac6661d4c81d4918df361492ab738d1f24d142fa9ea34f4b87abb1b02b6ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537183495&rft_id=info:pmid/24934075&rft_scielo_id=S0004_06222013000200010&rfr_iscdi=true |