Loading…

Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat

The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición 2013-06, Vol.63 (2), p.180-187
Main Authors: Imran, Samra, Hussain, Zaib, Ghafoor, Farkhanda, Nagra, Saeedahmad, Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 187
container_issue 2
container_start_page 180
container_title Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición
container_volume 63
creator Imran, Samra
Hussain, Zaib
Ghafoor, Farkhanda
Nagra, Saeedahmad
Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal
description The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm).
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0004_06222013000200010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0004_06222013000200010</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>1537183495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p250t-f3bac6661d4c81d4918df361492ab738d1f24d142fa9ea34f4b87abb1b02b6ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMlOwzAQzQFEy_ILKEcuQd6yHVHFJlXiAJwtL-PWVRIH2yn073FokWbmaUbvzWjeWbZECLECVYQssssQdggR1jbNRbZISBmqy2UmVq4fhRfR7iEHY6yyMKhD7kyurTHgYYh5D3HrdJiHm26KMOTwE71Q0boht3Nou4HBTSHfC28hWvgjf29BxOvs3IguwM0Jr7LPp8eP1Uuxfnt-XT2si5GUKBaGSqGqqsKaqSaVFjfa0AqzlghZ00ZjQ5jGjBjRgqDMMNnUQkosEZEVKHqV3R_3hvRC5_jOTX5IB_n7bAOfbSAI09SQlBglwd1RMHr3NUGIvLdBQdeJAdIrHJe0xg1lbZmotyfqJHvQfPS2F_7A_32kv5vPbOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537183495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Imran, Samra ; Hussain, Zaib ; Ghafoor, Farkhanda ; Nagra, Saeedahmad ; Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creator><creatorcontrib>Imran, Samra ; Hussain, Zaib ; Ghafoor, Farkhanda ; Nagra, Saeedahmad ; Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0622</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24934075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Venezuela: Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición</publisher><subject>Chemical Fractionation - methods ; Food Analysis - methods ; Food Handling - methods ; Glutens - isolation &amp; purification ; NUTRITION &amp; DIETETICS ; Triticum - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición, 2013-06, Vol.63 (2), p.180-187</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,37012</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24934075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imran, Samra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Zaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagra, Saeedahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</title><title>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición</title><addtitle>Arch Latinoam Nutr</addtitle><description>The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm).</description><subject>Chemical Fractionation - methods</subject><subject>Food Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Glutens - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>NUTRITION &amp; DIETETICS</subject><subject>Triticum - chemistry</subject><issn>0004-0622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1UMlOwzAQzQFEy_ILKEcuQd6yHVHFJlXiAJwtL-PWVRIH2yn073FokWbmaUbvzWjeWbZECLECVYQssssQdggR1jbNRbZISBmqy2UmVq4fhRfR7iEHY6yyMKhD7kyurTHgYYh5D3HrdJiHm26KMOTwE71Q0boht3Nou4HBTSHfC28hWvgjf29BxOvs3IguwM0Jr7LPp8eP1Uuxfnt-XT2si5GUKBaGSqGqqsKaqSaVFjfa0AqzlghZ00ZjQ5jGjBjRgqDMMNnUQkosEZEVKHqV3R_3hvRC5_jOTX5IB_n7bAOfbSAI09SQlBglwd1RMHr3NUGIvLdBQdeJAdIrHJe0xg1lbZmotyfqJHvQfPS2F_7A_32kv5vPbOQ</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Imran, Samra</creator><creator>Hussain, Zaib</creator><creator>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</creator><creator>Nagra, Saeedahmad</creator><creator>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creator><general>Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>RSQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</title><author>Imran, Samra ; Hussain, Zaib ; Ghafoor, Farkhanda ; Nagra, Saeedahmad ; Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p250t-f3bac6661d4c81d4918df361492ab738d1f24d142fa9ea34f4b87abb1b02b6ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Chemical Fractionation - methods</topic><topic>Food Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Glutens - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>NUTRITION &amp; DIETETICS</topic><topic>Triticum - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imran, Samra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Zaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagra, Saeedahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imran, Samra</au><au>Hussain, Zaib</au><au>Ghafoor, Farkhanda</au><au>Nagra, Saeedahmad</au><au>Ziai, Naheeda Ashbeal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat</atitle><jtitle>Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Latinoam Nutr</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>180-187</pages><issn>0004-0622</issn><abstract>The present study investigated six varieties of locally grown wheat (Lasani, Sehar, Miraj-08, Chakwal-50, Faisalabad-08 and Inqlab) procured from Punjab Seed Corporation, Lahore, Pakistan for their proximate contents. On the basis of protein content and ready availability, Faisalabad-08 (FD-08) was selected to be used for the assessment of comparative efficiency of various methods used for gluten extraction. Three methods, mechanical, chemical and microbiological were used for the extraction of gluten from FD-08. Each method was carried out under ambient conditions using a drying temperature of 55 degrees C. Mechanical method utilized four different processes viz:- dough process, dough batter process, batter process and ethanol washing process using standard 150 mesh. The starch thus obtained was analyzed for its proximate contents. Dough batter process proved to be the most efficient mechanical method and was further investigated using 200 and 300 mesh. Gluten content was determined using sandwich omega-gliadin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The results of dough batter process using 200 mesh indicated a starch product with gluten content of 678 ppm. Chemical method indicated high gluten content of more than 5000 ppm and the microbiological method reduced the gluten content from 2500 ppm to 398 ppm. From the results it was observed that no gluten extraction method is viable to produce starch which can fulfill the criteria of a gluten free product (20 ppm).</abstract><cop>Venezuela</cop><pub>Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición</pub><pmid>24934075</pmid><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0622
ispartof Archivos latinoamericanos de nutrición, 2013-06, Vol.63 (2), p.180-187
issn 0004-0622
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0004_06222013000200010
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Chemical Fractionation - methods
Food Analysis - methods
Food Handling - methods
Glutens - isolation & purification
NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Triticum - chemistry
title Comparative efficiency of different methods of gluten extraction in indigenous varieties of wheat
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A47%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20efficiency%20of%20different%20methods%20of%20gluten%20extraction%20in%20indigenous%20varieties%20of%20wheat&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20latinoamericanos%20de%20nutrici%C3%B3n&rft.au=Imran,%20Samra&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=180-187&rft.issn=0004-0622&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E1537183495%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p250t-f3bac6661d4c81d4918df361492ab738d1f24d142fa9ea34f4b87abb1b02b6ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537183495&rft_id=info:pmid/24934075&rft_scielo_id=S0004_06222013000200010&rfr_iscdi=true