Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation

• Published in: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia 2020-03, Vol.83 (2), p.141-145
• Main Authors: Andrade Junior, Newton, Hida, Wilson Takashi, Messias, André Marcio Vieira, Lyra, João Marcelo, Silva, Carlos André Mont'Alverne, Alves, Milton Ruiz
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Anterior Chamber - diagnostic imaging; Anterior Chamber - pathology; Biometry; Cornea - diagnostic imaging; Cornea - pathology; Corneal Topography - instrumentation; Female; Humans; Interferometry - instrumentation; Interferometry - methods; Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Multifocal Intraocular Lenses; OPHTHALMOLOGY; Original; Phacoemulsification - methods; Postoperative Period; Predictive Value of Tests; Reference Values; Refraction, Ocular - physiology; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity - physiology
• ISSN: 0004-2749; 1678-2925; 1678-2925
• DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200026

To compare the postoperative refractive predictability of IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR on the basis of keratometry and anterior chamber depth values in eyes with an indication for multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. This was a retrospective study conducted on 118 eyes treated with phacoemulsification and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Only the eyes that achieved emmetropia in the dynamic refraction performed on postoperative day 30 were included. Haigis' formula was used in each case to calculate the intraocular lens power, and the intraocular lens with the target refraction closest to emmetropia was implanted. Four lens calculation scenarios were tested by combining keratometry and anterior chamber depth measurements obtained using the two devices. IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR differed with regard to mean keratometry (D 0.07 ± 0.03 D; p=0.0065) and anterior chamber depth (D 0.08 ± 0.01 mm; p