Moeda única do Mercosul: notas para o debate

This article comments on some of the criticisms made to the proposal of a currency union among the Mercosur countries. It is clarified that the proposal must be understood as a target to be achieved after fulfilling a set of requirements. Besides, it is explained why we believe that the interpretati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 1998-06, Vol.41 (1), p.24-39
Main Author: Giambiagi, Fabio
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Subjects:
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 39
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
container_volume 41
creator Giambiagi, Fabio
description This article comments on some of the criticisms made to the proposal of a currency union among the Mercosur countries. It is clarified that the proposal must be understood as a target to be achieved after fulfilling a set of requirements. Besides, it is explained why we believe that the interpretation that the proposal would only be beneficial to Argentina is wrong and why some of the other criticisms, even being correct, do not invalidate the monetary unification. The paper concludes with a reflection about the Brazilian necessity of defining which role the country intends to play in the world, in 15 or 20 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-73291998000100002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0034_73291998000100002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0034_73291998000100002</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2935621611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1162-68e4185061942865f4b21f526c6bf93b7859cf5796b2682483a491a23a513fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj01LxDAQhoMouK7-BgOes2ZmkjTxJotfsIsH9VySNoVdSlOb9s959Y9ZXNGDh-Fl4H1meBi7BLkC7eT1i5SkREHowDkrpYR5JB6xBThLggDhmC1-S6fsLOf9vBao1IKJbYq1558f3a7yvE58G4cq5am94V0afea9HzxPvI7Bj_GcnTS-zfHiJ5fs7f7udf0oNs8PT-vbjegBDApjowKrpQGn0BrdqIDQaDSVCY2jUFjtqkYXzgQ0FpUlrxx4JK-BGh9oyVaHu7naxTaV-zQN3fyw_JYt_8nOwNUB6If0PsU8_iFASKQLq4C-AILgUUI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1323357841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moeda única do Mercosul: notas para o debate</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>SciELO Brazil</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Giambiagi, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Giambiagi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>This article comments on some of the criticisms made to the proposal of a currency union among the Mercosur countries. It is clarified that the proposal must be understood as a target to be achieved after fulfilling a set of requirements. Besides, it is explained why we believe that the interpretation that the proposal would only be beneficial to Argentina is wrong and why some of the other criticisms, even being correct, do not invalidate the monetary unification. The paper concludes with a reflection about the Brazilian necessity of defining which role the country intends to play in the world, in 15 or 20 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-7329</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1983-3121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1983-3121</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0034-73291998000100002</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brasília: Instituto Brasileiro de Relacoes Internaciðnais</publisher><subject>POLITICAL SCIENCE</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 1998-06, Vol.41 (1), p.24-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright Instituto Brasileiro de Relacoes Internaciðnais 1998</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1323357841/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1323357841?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,12824,12826,21366,21373,24129,25731,27901,27902,33200,33588,33962,36989,43709,43924,44566,73964,74211,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giambiagi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>Moeda única do Mercosul: notas para o debate</title><title>Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional</title><addtitle>Rev. bras. polít. int</addtitle><description>This article comments on some of the criticisms made to the proposal of a currency union among the Mercosur countries. It is clarified that the proposal must be understood as a target to be achieved after fulfilling a set of requirements. Besides, it is explained why we believe that the interpretation that the proposal would only be beneficial to Argentina is wrong and why some of the other criticisms, even being correct, do not invalidate the monetary unification. The paper concludes with a reflection about the Brazilian necessity of defining which role the country intends to play in the world, in 15 or 20 years.</description><subject>POLITICAL SCIENCE</subject><issn>0034-7329</issn><issn>1983-3121</issn><issn>1983-3121</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNplj01LxDAQhoMouK7-BgOes2ZmkjTxJotfsIsH9VySNoVdSlOb9s959Y9ZXNGDh-Fl4H1meBi7BLkC7eT1i5SkREHowDkrpYR5JB6xBThLggDhmC1-S6fsLOf9vBao1IKJbYq1558f3a7yvE58G4cq5am94V0afea9HzxPvI7Bj_GcnTS-zfHiJ5fs7f7udf0oNs8PT-vbjegBDApjowKrpQGn0BrdqIDQaDSVCY2jUFjtqkYXzgQ0FpUlrxx4JK-BGh9oyVaHu7naxTaV-zQN3fyw_JYt_8nOwNUB6If0PsU8_iFASKQLq4C-AILgUUI</recordid><startdate>19980601</startdate><enddate>19980601</enddate><creator>Giambiagi, Fabio</creator><general>Instituto Brasileiro de Relacoes Internaciðnais</general><general>Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980601</creationdate><title>Moeda única do Mercosul: notas para o debate</title><author>Giambiagi, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1162-68e4185061942865f4b21f526c6bf93b7859cf5796b2682483a491a23a513fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>POLITICAL SCIENCE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giambiagi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giambiagi, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moeda única do Mercosul: notas para o debate</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional</jtitle><addtitle>Rev. bras. polít. int</addtitle><date>1998-06-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>24-39</pages><issn>0034-7329</issn><issn>1983-3121</issn><eissn>1983-3121</eissn><abstract>This article comments on some of the criticisms made to the proposal of a currency union among the Mercosur countries. It is clarified that the proposal must be understood as a target to be achieved after fulfilling a set of requirements. Besides, it is explained why we believe that the interpretation that the proposal would only be beneficial to Argentina is wrong and why some of the other criticisms, even being correct, do not invalidate the monetary unification. The paper concludes with a reflection about the Brazilian necessity of defining which role the country intends to play in the world, in 15 or 20 years.</abstract><cop>Brasília</cop><pub>Instituto Brasileiro de Relacoes Internaciðnais</pub><doi>10.1590/S0034-73291998000100002</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-7329
ispartof Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 1998-06, Vol.41 (1), p.24-39
issn 0034-7329
1983-3121
1983-3121
language por
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0034_73291998000100002
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); SciELO Brazil; Publicly Available Content Database; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects POLITICAL SCIENCE
title Moeda única do Mercosul: notas para o debate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moeda%20%C3%BAnica%20do%20Mercosul:%20notas%20para%20o%20debate&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20Pol%C3%ADtica%20Internacional&rft.au=Giambiagi,%20Fabio&rft.date=1998-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=24-39&rft.issn=0034-7329&rft.eissn=1983-3121&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0034-73291998000100002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2935621611%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1162-68e4185061942865f4b21f526c6bf93b7859cf5796b2682483a491a23a513fab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1323357841&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0034_73291998000100002&rfr_iscdi=true