Loading…

Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) has been considered a reliable method for the evaluation of students' clinical skills in health sciences, but it has been rarely applied in the teaching of physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the OSCE as a tool to eva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil)) Brazil)), 2011-12, Vol.15 (6), p.481-486
Main Authors: Silva, Cibele C. B. M., Lunardi, Adriana C., Mendes, Felipe A. R., Souza, Flavia F. P., Carvalho, Celso R. F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-34b7602234257189a0bc006f3044a1f8cebc62149bcafe5e40fc430c6af432023
cites
container_end_page 486
container_issue 6
container_start_page 481
container_title Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil))
container_volume 15
creator Silva, Cibele C. B. M.
Lunardi, Adriana C.
Mendes, Felipe A. R.
Souza, Flavia F. P.
Carvalho, Celso R. F.
description BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) has been considered a reliable method for the evaluation of students' clinical skills in health sciences, but it has been rarely applied in the teaching of physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the OSCE as a tool to evaluate the abilities of undergraduate chest physical therapy students and to verify the internal consistency of the OSCE exam. METHODS: Forty-seven students were evaluated using two types of exams: the traditional exam and the OSCE. Independent educators elaborated the exams. Each question (traditional) or station (OSCE) was given a score ranging from 0.0 to 2.0; being 10.0 the highest possible score of both exams. The relationship between the total score that were obtained from both exams was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was evaluated by four experienced chest physical therapists and it was tested using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The students' average score on the OSCE ranged from 4.4 to 9.6. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was considered good (0.7). The agreement between exams was analyzed, and it was determined that the exams are not comparable. Examiners also observed a low agreement between the two exams (r=-0.1; p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that OSCE and traditional exams are not interchangeable. The OSCE exam had good internal consistency and is able to evaluate aspects that the traditional exam fails to evaluate.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-35552011005000033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1413_35552011000600009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1413_35552011000600009</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S1413_35552011000600009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-34b7602234257189a0bc006f3044a1f8cebc62149bcafe5e40fc430c6af432023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1Ow0AMhWcBEqVwBuYCKZ6fpAk7VPEnVeoCWEeTiUNSpUk1nlTKGbg0k7aCBV7Yi-f3bH2M3QlYiDiD-3ehhYpUHMcShACIIZRSF2z2K1yxa6JtkFIhYca-N8UWrW8OyMm7wfrBYclt23SNNS3Hg2kH45u-44a4mToh0Q47z3fo677kVe_40JXovpwpwy5yWyN5vq9HOmb4Gp3ZjyF_KIOPHrjh1vVEEU2X-y7sTNp4wy4r0xLenuecfT4_faxeo_Xm5W31uI6szFIfKV0sE5BSaRkvRZoZKCxAUinQ2ogqtVjYRAqdFdZUGKOGymoFNjGVVhKkmrPFKZdsg22fb_vBhScoP-LL__BBMvHLgmF5Mhzfdljle9fsjBtzAfkE_p_zDF79ANpleWc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><creator>Silva, Cibele C. B. M. ; Lunardi, Adriana C. ; Mendes, Felipe A. R. ; Souza, Flavia F. P. ; Carvalho, Celso R. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Cibele C. B. M. ; Lunardi, Adriana C. ; Mendes, Felipe A. R. ; Souza, Flavia F. P. ; Carvalho, Celso R. F.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) has been considered a reliable method for the evaluation of students' clinical skills in health sciences, but it has been rarely applied in the teaching of physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the OSCE as a tool to evaluate the abilities of undergraduate chest physical therapy students and to verify the internal consistency of the OSCE exam. METHODS: Forty-seven students were evaluated using two types of exams: the traditional exam and the OSCE. Independent educators elaborated the exams. Each question (traditional) or station (OSCE) was given a score ranging from 0.0 to 2.0; being 10.0 the highest possible score of both exams. The relationship between the total score that were obtained from both exams was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was evaluated by four experienced chest physical therapists and it was tested using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The students' average score on the OSCE ranged from 4.4 to 9.6. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was considered good (0.7). The agreement between exams was analyzed, and it was determined that the exams are not comparable. Examiners also observed a low agreement between the two exams (r=-0.1; p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that OSCE and traditional exams are not interchangeable. The OSCE exam had good internal consistency and is able to evaluate aspects that the traditional exam fails to evaluate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1413-3555</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1809-9246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S1413-35552011005000033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia</publisher><subject>ORTHOPEDICS ; REHABILITATION</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil)), 2011-12, Vol.15 (6), p.481-486</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-34b7602234257189a0bc006f3044a1f8cebc62149bcafe5e40fc430c6af432023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,24150,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Cibele C. B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunardi, Adriana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Felipe A. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Flavia F. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Celso R. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study</title><title>Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil))</title><addtitle>Braz. J. Phys. Ther</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) has been considered a reliable method for the evaluation of students' clinical skills in health sciences, but it has been rarely applied in the teaching of physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the OSCE as a tool to evaluate the abilities of undergraduate chest physical therapy students and to verify the internal consistency of the OSCE exam. METHODS: Forty-seven students were evaluated using two types of exams: the traditional exam and the OSCE. Independent educators elaborated the exams. Each question (traditional) or station (OSCE) was given a score ranging from 0.0 to 2.0; being 10.0 the highest possible score of both exams. The relationship between the total score that were obtained from both exams was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was evaluated by four experienced chest physical therapists and it was tested using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The students' average score on the OSCE ranged from 4.4 to 9.6. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was considered good (0.7). The agreement between exams was analyzed, and it was determined that the exams are not comparable. Examiners also observed a low agreement between the two exams (r=-0.1; p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that OSCE and traditional exams are not interchangeable. The OSCE exam had good internal consistency and is able to evaluate aspects that the traditional exam fails to evaluate.</description><subject>ORTHOPEDICS</subject><subject>REHABILITATION</subject><issn>1413-3555</issn><issn>1809-9246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE1Ow0AMhWcBEqVwBuYCKZ6fpAk7VPEnVeoCWEeTiUNSpUk1nlTKGbg0k7aCBV7Yi-f3bH2M3QlYiDiD-3ehhYpUHMcShACIIZRSF2z2K1yxa6JtkFIhYca-N8UWrW8OyMm7wfrBYclt23SNNS3Hg2kH45u-44a4mToh0Q47z3fo677kVe_40JXovpwpwy5yWyN5vq9HOmb4Gp3ZjyF_KIOPHrjh1vVEEU2X-y7sTNp4wy4r0xLenuecfT4_faxeo_Xm5W31uI6szFIfKV0sE5BSaRkvRZoZKCxAUinQ2ogqtVjYRAqdFdZUGKOGymoFNjGVVhKkmrPFKZdsg22fb_vBhScoP-LL__BBMvHLgmF5Mhzfdljle9fsjBtzAfkE_p_zDF79ANpleWc</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Silva, Cibele C. B. M.</creator><creator>Lunardi, Adriana C.</creator><creator>Mendes, Felipe A. R.</creator><creator>Souza, Flavia F. P.</creator><creator>Carvalho, Celso R. F.</creator><general>Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study</title><author>Silva, Cibele C. B. M. ; Lunardi, Adriana C. ; Mendes, Felipe A. R. ; Souza, Flavia F. P. ; Carvalho, Celso R. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-34b7602234257189a0bc006f3044a1f8cebc62149bcafe5e40fc430c6af432023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>ORTHOPEDICS</topic><topic>REHABILITATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Cibele C. B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunardi, Adriana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Felipe A. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Flavia F. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Celso R. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil))</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Cibele C. B. M.</au><au>Lunardi, Adriana C.</au><au>Mendes, Felipe A. R.</au><au>Souza, Flavia F. P.</au><au>Carvalho, Celso R. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil))</jtitle><addtitle>Braz. J. Phys. Ther</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>481-486</pages><issn>1413-3555</issn><issn>1809-9246</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) has been considered a reliable method for the evaluation of students' clinical skills in health sciences, but it has been rarely applied in the teaching of physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the OSCE as a tool to evaluate the abilities of undergraduate chest physical therapy students and to verify the internal consistency of the OSCE exam. METHODS: Forty-seven students were evaluated using two types of exams: the traditional exam and the OSCE. Independent educators elaborated the exams. Each question (traditional) or station (OSCE) was given a score ranging from 0.0 to 2.0; being 10.0 the highest possible score of both exams. The relationship between the total score that were obtained from both exams was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was evaluated by four experienced chest physical therapists and it was tested using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The students' average score on the OSCE ranged from 4.4 to 9.6. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was considered good (0.7). The agreement between exams was analyzed, and it was determined that the exams are not comparable. Examiners also observed a low agreement between the two exams (r=-0.1; p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that OSCE and traditional exams are not interchangeable. The OSCE exam had good internal consistency and is able to evaluate aspects that the traditional exam fails to evaluate.</abstract><pub>Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia</pub><doi>10.1590/S1413-35552011005000033</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1413-3555
ispartof Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil)), 2011-12, Vol.15 (6), p.481-486
issn 1413-3555
1809-9246
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S1413_35552011000600009
source SciELO Brazil; IngentaConnect Journals
subjects ORTHOPEDICS
REHABILITATION
title Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T03%3A43%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Objective%20structured%20clinical%20evaluation%20as%20an%20assessment%20method%20for%20undergraduate%20chest%20physical%20therapy%20students:%20a%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20fisioterapia%20(Sa%CC%83o%20Carlos%20(Sa%CC%83o%20Paulo,%20Brazil))&rft.au=Silva,%20Cibele%20C.%20B.%20M.&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=481-486&rft.issn=1413-3555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S1413-35552011005000033&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES1413_35552011000600009%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-34b7602234257189a0bc006f3044a1f8cebc62149bcafe5e40fc430c6af432023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1413_35552011000600009&rfr_iscdi=true