Loading…

Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?

ABSTRACT This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship among digestibility, residual feed intake (RFI), and enteric methane emission in growing Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) divergently classified based on RFI phenotype and breeding value (EBV-RFI). Animals (n = 122) subjected to performance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista brasileira de zootecnia 2024-01, Vol.53
Main Authors: Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes, Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya, Souza, Luana Lelis, Benfica, Lorena Ferreira, Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos, Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de, Malheiros, Jessica Moraes, Canesin, Roberta Carrilho, Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins, Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de, Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti
Format: Article
Language:eng ; por
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-2fea7cc686249dcc586ed79103d21a94b32d94608273b94fec8784cf44b1e7443
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Revista brasileira de zootecnia
container_volume 53
creator Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes
Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya
Souza, Luana Lelis
Benfica, Lorena Ferreira
Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos
Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de
Malheiros, Jessica Moraes
Canesin, Roberta Carrilho
Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins
Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de
Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti
description ABSTRACT This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship among digestibility, residual feed intake (RFI), and enteric methane emission in growing Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) divergently classified based on RFI phenotype and breeding value (EBV-RFI). Animals (n = 122) subjected to performance testing (forage:concentrate ratio of 60:40) in two test groups were classified based on RFI. A sample of 80 animals classified as low (−0.748±0.076 kg DM/day) or high (0.775±0.075 kg DM/day) RFI was evaluated regarding feed compounds digestibility, fecal excretion, and methane emission (CH4, g/day). Statistical mixed models included fixed effects of RFI (or EBV-RFI), linear effect of initial age as covariate, and the random effects of the test group. There was no difference in the digestibility of feed compounds between the most and least efficient animals. However, dry matter intake (DMI; 6.92 vs. 8.66 kg DM/day) and feed conversion (7.93 vs. 9.42 kg/kg) were lesser in low RFI animals. On average, low RFI animals emitted 14.3 g less CH4 per day (174 vs. 188 g CH4/day); however, CH4 emission expressed as g/kg DMI (23.1 vs. 20.1) and the percentage of gross energy intake lost as CH4 (8.13 vs. 7.08%) were greater for these animals. These results showed the benefits of using more feed efficient animals in the beef production chain, i.e., animals that exhibit lower feed intake, lower fecal excretion, and lower enteric methane emission without differences in weight gain or body weight. However, the variations in feed efficiency among them cannot be explained by differences in dry matter or feed compounds digestibility. More efficient animals emit less enteric methane than less efficient animals, probably as a result of lower DMI.
doi_str_mv 10.37496/rbz5320230121
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1516_35982024000100908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1516_35982024000100908</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S1516_35982024000100908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-2fea7cc686249dcc586ed79103d21a94b32d94608273b94fec8784cf44b1e7443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXz_kHtk4-NpucRIofhaIH9bxkk1mbut0tSYrUv96tCuLpDY_3ZpgfIZcMZqKSRl3F5rMUHLgAxtkRmTANqjDcwPE4l0wVojT6lJyltAbglTAwIf0iUbvd2oh9pj68YcqhCV3Ie2pTGlywGT39CHlFI6bgd7ajLY5W6LN9R2p7T8cqxuDoBvPK9khxE1IKQz9m6CN23RCROptzh9fn5KS1XcKLX52S17vbl_lDsXy6X8xvloVjSuSCt2gr55RWXBrvXKkV-sowEJ4za2QjuDdSgR6_aIxs0elKS9dK2TCspBRTMvvZm1zAbqjXwy7248H6-QCiPoAYQUkAYAAG9F_BxSGliG29jWFj475mUH_jrf_hFV-OTW0J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><creator>Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes ; Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya ; Souza, Luana Lelis ; Benfica, Lorena Ferreira ; Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos ; Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de ; Malheiros, Jessica Moraes ; Canesin, Roberta Carrilho ; Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins ; Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de ; Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti</creator><creatorcontrib>Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes ; Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya ; Souza, Luana Lelis ; Benfica, Lorena Ferreira ; Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos ; Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de ; Malheiros, Jessica Moraes ; Canesin, Roberta Carrilho ; Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins ; Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de ; Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship among digestibility, residual feed intake (RFI), and enteric methane emission in growing Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) divergently classified based on RFI phenotype and breeding value (EBV-RFI). Animals (n = 122) subjected to performance testing (forage:concentrate ratio of 60:40) in two test groups were classified based on RFI. A sample of 80 animals classified as low (−0.748±0.076 kg DM/day) or high (0.775±0.075 kg DM/day) RFI was evaluated regarding feed compounds digestibility, fecal excretion, and methane emission (CH4, g/day). Statistical mixed models included fixed effects of RFI (or EBV-RFI), linear effect of initial age as covariate, and the random effects of the test group. There was no difference in the digestibility of feed compounds between the most and least efficient animals. However, dry matter intake (DMI; 6.92 vs. 8.66 kg DM/day) and feed conversion (7.93 vs. 9.42 kg/kg) were lesser in low RFI animals. On average, low RFI animals emitted 14.3 g less CH4 per day (174 vs. 188 g CH4/day); however, CH4 emission expressed as g/kg DMI (23.1 vs. 20.1) and the percentage of gross energy intake lost as CH4 (8.13 vs. 7.08%) were greater for these animals. These results showed the benefits of using more feed efficient animals in the beef production chain, i.e., animals that exhibit lower feed intake, lower fecal excretion, and lower enteric methane emission without differences in weight gain or body weight. However, the variations in feed efficiency among them cannot be explained by differences in dry matter or feed compounds digestibility. More efficient animals emit less enteric methane than less efficient animals, probably as a result of lower DMI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1516-3598</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37496/rbz5320230121</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY &amp; ANIMAL SCIENCE ; VETERINARY SCIENCES</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de zootecnia, 2024-01, Vol.53</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-2fea7cc686249dcc586ed79103d21a94b32d94608273b94fec8784cf44b1e7443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8055-4112 ; 0000-0001-7242-7132 ; 0000-0002-9255-0733 ; 0000-0002-2030-7590 ; 0000-0002-4926-3296 ; 0000-0002-1891-6303 ; 0000-0003-1938-4596 ; 0009-0002-1330-9659 ; 0000-0003-3548-903X ; 0000-0001-7862-0662 ; 0000-0002-1218-5378</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,24129,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Luana Lelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfica, Lorena Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malheiros, Jessica Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canesin, Roberta Carrilho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti</creatorcontrib><title>Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?</title><title>Revista brasileira de zootecnia</title><addtitle>R. Bras. Zootec</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship among digestibility, residual feed intake (RFI), and enteric methane emission in growing Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) divergently classified based on RFI phenotype and breeding value (EBV-RFI). Animals (n = 122) subjected to performance testing (forage:concentrate ratio of 60:40) in two test groups were classified based on RFI. A sample of 80 animals classified as low (−0.748±0.076 kg DM/day) or high (0.775±0.075 kg DM/day) RFI was evaluated regarding feed compounds digestibility, fecal excretion, and methane emission (CH4, g/day). Statistical mixed models included fixed effects of RFI (or EBV-RFI), linear effect of initial age as covariate, and the random effects of the test group. There was no difference in the digestibility of feed compounds between the most and least efficient animals. However, dry matter intake (DMI; 6.92 vs. 8.66 kg DM/day) and feed conversion (7.93 vs. 9.42 kg/kg) were lesser in low RFI animals. On average, low RFI animals emitted 14.3 g less CH4 per day (174 vs. 188 g CH4/day); however, CH4 emission expressed as g/kg DMI (23.1 vs. 20.1) and the percentage of gross energy intake lost as CH4 (8.13 vs. 7.08%) were greater for these animals. These results showed the benefits of using more feed efficient animals in the beef production chain, i.e., animals that exhibit lower feed intake, lower fecal excretion, and lower enteric methane emission without differences in weight gain or body weight. However, the variations in feed efficiency among them cannot be explained by differences in dry matter or feed compounds digestibility. More efficient animals emit less enteric methane than less efficient animals, probably as a result of lower DMI.</description><subject>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY &amp; ANIMAL SCIENCE</subject><subject>VETERINARY SCIENCES</subject><issn>1516-3598</issn><issn>1806-9290</issn><issn>1806-9290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXz_kHtk4-NpucRIofhaIH9bxkk1mbut0tSYrUv96tCuLpDY_3ZpgfIZcMZqKSRl3F5rMUHLgAxtkRmTANqjDcwPE4l0wVojT6lJyltAbglTAwIf0iUbvd2oh9pj68YcqhCV3Ie2pTGlywGT39CHlFI6bgd7ajLY5W6LN9R2p7T8cqxuDoBvPK9khxE1IKQz9m6CN23RCROptzh9fn5KS1XcKLX52S17vbl_lDsXy6X8xvloVjSuSCt2gr55RWXBrvXKkV-sowEJ4za2QjuDdSgR6_aIxs0elKS9dK2TCspBRTMvvZm1zAbqjXwy7248H6-QCiPoAYQUkAYAAG9F_BxSGliG29jWFj475mUH_jrf_hFV-OTW0J</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya</creator><creator>Souza, Luana Lelis</creator><creator>Benfica, Lorena Ferreira</creator><creator>Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos</creator><creator>Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de</creator><creator>Malheiros, Jessica Moraes</creator><creator>Canesin, Roberta Carrilho</creator><creator>Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins</creator><creator>Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de</creator><creator>Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-4112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-7132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-0733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-7590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-3296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1938-4596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1330-9659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-903X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-0662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-5378</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?</title><author>Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes ; Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya ; Souza, Luana Lelis ; Benfica, Lorena Ferreira ; Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos ; Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de ; Malheiros, Jessica Moraes ; Canesin, Roberta Carrilho ; Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins ; Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de ; Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-2fea7cc686249dcc586ed79103d21a94b32d94608273b94fec8784cf44b1e7443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>AGRICULTURE, DAIRY &amp; ANIMAL SCIENCE</topic><topic>VETERINARY SCIENCES</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Luana Lelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfica, Lorena Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malheiros, Jessica Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canesin, Roberta Carrilho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de zootecnia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gianvecchio, Sarah Bernardes</au><au>Sakamoto, Leandro Sannomiya</au><au>Souza, Luana Lelis</au><au>Benfica, Lorena Ferreira</au><au>Marcatto, Juliana de Oliveira Santos</au><au>Paula, Eduardo Marostegan de</au><au>Malheiros, Jessica Moraes</au><au>Canesin, Roberta Carrilho</au><au>Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo Martins</au><au>Albuquerque, Lucia Galvão de</au><au>Mercadante, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de zootecnia</jtitle><addtitle>R. Bras. Zootec</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issn>1516-3598</issn><issn>1806-9290</issn><eissn>1806-9290</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship among digestibility, residual feed intake (RFI), and enteric methane emission in growing Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) divergently classified based on RFI phenotype and breeding value (EBV-RFI). Animals (n = 122) subjected to performance testing (forage:concentrate ratio of 60:40) in two test groups were classified based on RFI. A sample of 80 animals classified as low (−0.748±0.076 kg DM/day) or high (0.775±0.075 kg DM/day) RFI was evaluated regarding feed compounds digestibility, fecal excretion, and methane emission (CH4, g/day). Statistical mixed models included fixed effects of RFI (or EBV-RFI), linear effect of initial age as covariate, and the random effects of the test group. There was no difference in the digestibility of feed compounds between the most and least efficient animals. However, dry matter intake (DMI; 6.92 vs. 8.66 kg DM/day) and feed conversion (7.93 vs. 9.42 kg/kg) were lesser in low RFI animals. On average, low RFI animals emitted 14.3 g less CH4 per day (174 vs. 188 g CH4/day); however, CH4 emission expressed as g/kg DMI (23.1 vs. 20.1) and the percentage of gross energy intake lost as CH4 (8.13 vs. 7.08%) were greater for these animals. These results showed the benefits of using more feed efficient animals in the beef production chain, i.e., animals that exhibit lower feed intake, lower fecal excretion, and lower enteric methane emission without differences in weight gain or body weight. However, the variations in feed efficiency among them cannot be explained by differences in dry matter or feed compounds digestibility. More efficient animals emit less enteric methane than less efficient animals, probably as a result of lower DMI.</abstract><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</pub><doi>10.37496/rbz5320230121</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-4112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-7132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-0733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-7590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-3296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1938-4596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1330-9659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-903X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-0662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-5378</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1516-3598
ispartof Revista brasileira de zootecnia, 2024-01, Vol.53
issn 1516-3598
1806-9290
1806-9290
language eng ; por
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S1516_35982024000100908
source SciELO Brazil
subjects AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
VETERINARY SCIENCES
title Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20apparent%20digestibility%20associated%20with%20residual%20feed%20intake%20and%20enteric%20methane%20emission%20in%20Nellore%20cattle?&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20zootecnia&rft.au=Gianvecchio,%20Sarah%20Bernardes&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issn=1516-3598&rft.eissn=1806-9290&rft_id=info:doi/10.37496/rbz5320230121&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES1516_35982024000100908%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-2fea7cc686249dcc586ed79103d21a94b32d94608273b94fec8784cf44b1e7443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1516_35982024000100908&rfr_iscdi=true