Loading…
Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients
Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all h...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brazilian journal of microbiology 2012-07, Vol.43 (3), p.903-908 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 908 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 903 |
container_title | Brazilian journal of microbiology |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Ramis, Ivy Bastos de Moraes, Ernani Pinho Fernandes, Márcia Silveira Mendoza-Sassi, Raul Rodrigues, Obirajara Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela Scaini, Carlos James da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida |
description | Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1517_83822012000300008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1517_83822012000300008</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2896063411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uktr3DAQFqWlSbf9C62gl16c6mHZ8qVQQtoUAjkkPQtZGu0q2JYryYElf77abHbpA3IQ0qDvNcMg9IGSMyo68vmGCtpWkkvGCGWEEF4OkS_QKW1aWdU1ES_L-wA6QW9SuiOECVKz1-iE1YTTjohT9HBxr4dFZx8mHBy2Xq-nkLI3eIS8CTZhFyLOG8AWMpgD7hIGb0KvTYaI5-0Qosd-wmudcizc3oc5bXGawfgRpvQovS3lvFOeix1MOb1Fr5weErx7ulfo57eL2_PL6ur6-4_zr1eVEYLkqulkb6SwlAqpQeu6b4zooBFSyq5mPeld0zhrHbGgnesppdxS7gR3ljbG8BU62-sm42EI6i4scSqG6nGK6r8pFsKXPWFe-hGsKWGjHtQc_ajjVgXt1d8_k9-odbhXvG2kbFkR-PQkEMOvBVJWo08GhkFPEJakaM1ZwyjjO6-P_0CP8SiTHWGMlX5WqN2jTAwpRXDHMJSo3UY808v7P3s58g4rwH8D_jOyRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1289022211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</title><source>SciELO</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ramis, Ivy Bastos ; de Moraes, Ernani Pinho ; Fernandes, Márcia Silveira ; Mendoza-Sassi, Raul ; Rodrigues, Obirajara ; Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela ; Scaini, Carlos James ; da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramis, Ivy Bastos ; de Moraes, Ernani Pinho ; Fernandes, Márcia Silveira ; Mendoza-Sassi, Raul ; Rodrigues, Obirajara ; Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela ; Scaini, Carlos James ; da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creatorcontrib><description>Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1517-8382</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-4405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24031905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Diagnostic tests ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Histology ; Medical Microbiology ; MICROBIOLOGY ; Polymerase chain reaction</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of microbiology, 2012-07, Vol.43 (3), p.903-908</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2012</rights><rights>Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2012</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768872/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768872/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24031905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Obirajara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaini, Carlos James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</title><title>Brazilian journal of microbiology</title><addtitle>Braz J Microbiol</addtitle><description>Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.</description><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>MICROBIOLOGY</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><issn>1517-8382</issn><issn>1678-4405</issn><issn>1678-4405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uktr3DAQFqWlSbf9C62gl16c6mHZ8qVQQtoUAjkkPQtZGu0q2JYryYElf77abHbpA3IQ0qDvNcMg9IGSMyo68vmGCtpWkkvGCGWEEF4OkS_QKW1aWdU1ES_L-wA6QW9SuiOECVKz1-iE1YTTjohT9HBxr4dFZx8mHBy2Xq-nkLI3eIS8CTZhFyLOG8AWMpgD7hIGb0KvTYaI5-0Qosd-wmudcizc3oc5bXGawfgRpvQovS3lvFOeix1MOb1Fr5weErx7ulfo57eL2_PL6ur6-4_zr1eVEYLkqulkb6SwlAqpQeu6b4zooBFSyq5mPeld0zhrHbGgnesppdxS7gR3ljbG8BU62-sm42EI6i4scSqG6nGK6r8pFsKXPWFe-hGsKWGjHtQc_ajjVgXt1d8_k9-odbhXvG2kbFkR-PQkEMOvBVJWo08GhkFPEJakaM1ZwyjjO6-P_0CP8SiTHWGMlX5WqN2jTAwpRXDHMJSo3UY808v7P3s58g4rwH8D_jOyRQ</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</creator><creator>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</creator><creator>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</creator><creator>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Obirajara</creator><creator>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</creator><creator>Scaini, Carlos James</creator><creator>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</title><author>Ramis, Ivy Bastos ; de Moraes, Ernani Pinho ; Fernandes, Márcia Silveira ; Mendoza-Sassi, Raul ; Rodrigues, Obirajara ; Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela ; Scaini, Carlos James ; da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>MICROBIOLOGY</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Obirajara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaini, Carlos James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</au><au>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</au><au>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</au><au>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</au><au>Rodrigues, Obirajara</au><au>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</au><au>Scaini, Carlos James</au><au>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Braz J Microbiol</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>903</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>903-908</pages><issn>1517-8382</issn><issn>1678-4405</issn><eissn>1678-4405</eissn><abstract>Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>24031905</pmid><doi>10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1517-8382 |
ispartof | Brazilian journal of microbiology, 2012-07, Vol.43 (3), p.903-908 |
issn | 1517-8382 1678-4405 1678-4405 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S1517_83822012000300008 |
source | SciELO; PubMed Central |
subjects | Diagnostic tests Gastrointestinal diseases Gram-negative bacteria Histology Medical Microbiology MICROBIOLOGY Polymerase chain reaction |
title | Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A06%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20diagnostic%20methods%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20Helicobacter%20pylori%20in%20gastric%20biopsy%20specimens%20of%20dyspeptic%20patients&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20microbiology&rft.au=Ramis,%20Ivy%20Bastos&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=903&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=903-908&rft.issn=1517-8382&rft.eissn=1678-4405&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2896063411%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1289022211&rft_id=info:pmid/24031905&rft_scielo_id=S1517_83822012000300008&rfr_iscdi=true |