Loading…

Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients

Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian journal of microbiology 2012-07, Vol.43 (3), p.903-908
Main Authors: Ramis, Ivy Bastos, de Moraes, Ernani Pinho, Fernandes, Márcia Silveira, Mendoza-Sassi, Raul, Rodrigues, Obirajara, Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela, Scaini, Carlos James, da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3
cites
container_end_page 908
container_issue 3
container_start_page 903
container_title Brazilian journal of microbiology
container_volume 43
creator Ramis, Ivy Bastos
de Moraes, Ernani Pinho
Fernandes, Márcia Silveira
Mendoza-Sassi, Raul
Rodrigues, Obirajara
Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela
Scaini, Carlos James
da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida
description Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1517_83822012000300008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1517_83822012000300008</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2896063411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uktr3DAQFqWlSbf9C62gl16c6mHZ8qVQQtoUAjkkPQtZGu0q2JYryYElf77abHbpA3IQ0qDvNcMg9IGSMyo68vmGCtpWkkvGCGWEEF4OkS_QKW1aWdU1ES_L-wA6QW9SuiOECVKz1-iE1YTTjohT9HBxr4dFZx8mHBy2Xq-nkLI3eIS8CTZhFyLOG8AWMpgD7hIGb0KvTYaI5-0Qosd-wmudcizc3oc5bXGawfgRpvQovS3lvFOeix1MOb1Fr5weErx7ulfo57eL2_PL6ur6-4_zr1eVEYLkqulkb6SwlAqpQeu6b4zooBFSyq5mPeld0zhrHbGgnesppdxS7gR3ljbG8BU62-sm42EI6i4scSqG6nGK6r8pFsKXPWFe-hGsKWGjHtQc_ajjVgXt1d8_k9-odbhXvG2kbFkR-PQkEMOvBVJWo08GhkFPEJakaM1ZwyjjO6-P_0CP8SiTHWGMlX5WqN2jTAwpRXDHMJSo3UY808v7P3s58g4rwH8D_jOyRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1289022211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</title><source>SciELO</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ramis, Ivy Bastos ; de Moraes, Ernani Pinho ; Fernandes, Márcia Silveira ; Mendoza-Sassi, Raul ; Rodrigues, Obirajara ; Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela ; Scaini, Carlos James ; da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramis, Ivy Bastos ; de Moraes, Ernani Pinho ; Fernandes, Márcia Silveira ; Mendoza-Sassi, Raul ; Rodrigues, Obirajara ; Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela ; Scaini, Carlos James ; da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creatorcontrib><description>Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1517-8382</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-4405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24031905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Diagnostic tests ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Histology ; Medical Microbiology ; MICROBIOLOGY ; Polymerase chain reaction</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of microbiology, 2012-07, Vol.43 (3), p.903-908</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2012</rights><rights>Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2012</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768872/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768872/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24031905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Obirajara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaini, Carlos James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</title><title>Brazilian journal of microbiology</title><addtitle>Braz J Microbiol</addtitle><description>Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.</description><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>MICROBIOLOGY</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><issn>1517-8382</issn><issn>1678-4405</issn><issn>1678-4405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uktr3DAQFqWlSbf9C62gl16c6mHZ8qVQQtoUAjkkPQtZGu0q2JYryYElf77abHbpA3IQ0qDvNcMg9IGSMyo68vmGCtpWkkvGCGWEEF4OkS_QKW1aWdU1ES_L-wA6QW9SuiOECVKz1-iE1YTTjohT9HBxr4dFZx8mHBy2Xq-nkLI3eIS8CTZhFyLOG8AWMpgD7hIGb0KvTYaI5-0Qosd-wmudcizc3oc5bXGawfgRpvQovS3lvFOeix1MOb1Fr5weErx7ulfo57eL2_PL6ur6-4_zr1eVEYLkqulkb6SwlAqpQeu6b4zooBFSyq5mPeld0zhrHbGgnesppdxS7gR3ljbG8BU62-sm42EI6i4scSqG6nGK6r8pFsKXPWFe-hGsKWGjHtQc_ajjVgXt1d8_k9-odbhXvG2kbFkR-PQkEMOvBVJWo08GhkFPEJakaM1ZwyjjO6-P_0CP8SiTHWGMlX5WqN2jTAwpRXDHMJSo3UY808v7P3s58g4rwH8D_jOyRQ</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</creator><creator>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</creator><creator>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</creator><creator>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Obirajara</creator><creator>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</creator><creator>Scaini, Carlos James</creator><creator>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</title><author>Ramis, Ivy Bastos ; de Moraes, Ernani Pinho ; Fernandes, Márcia Silveira ; Mendoza-Sassi, Raul ; Rodrigues, Obirajara ; Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela ; Scaini, Carlos James ; da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>MICROBIOLOGY</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Obirajara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaini, Carlos James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramis, Ivy Bastos</au><au>de Moraes, Ernani Pinho</au><au>Fernandes, Márcia Silveira</au><au>Mendoza-Sassi, Raul</au><au>Rodrigues, Obirajara</au><au>Juliano, Carlos Renan Varela</au><au>Scaini, Carlos James</au><au>da Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Braz J Microbiol</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>903</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>903-908</pages><issn>1517-8382</issn><issn>1678-4405</issn><eissn>1678-4405</eissn><abstract>Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>24031905</pmid><doi>10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1517-8382
ispartof Brazilian journal of microbiology, 2012-07, Vol.43 (3), p.903-908
issn 1517-8382
1678-4405
1678-4405
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S1517_83822012000300008
source SciELO; PubMed Central
subjects Diagnostic tests
Gastrointestinal diseases
Gram-negative bacteria
Histology
Medical Microbiology
MICROBIOLOGY
Polymerase chain reaction
title Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A06%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20diagnostic%20methods%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20Helicobacter%20pylori%20in%20gastric%20biopsy%20specimens%20of%20dyspeptic%20patients&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20microbiology&rft.au=Ramis,%20Ivy%20Bastos&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=903&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=903-908&rft.issn=1517-8382&rft.eissn=1678-4405&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S1517-83822012000300008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2896063411%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-698bc85d1158aeaa4b6c59e65888942b0bf66fddf0deaffb1113d13f53fd16cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1289022211&rft_id=info:pmid/24031905&rft_scielo_id=S1517_83822012000300008&rfr_iscdi=true