Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants

Abstract Aim : To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN(r), Morelli(r), and Conexao(r)). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian journal of oral sciences 2015-09, Vol.14 (3), p.251-255
Main Authors: Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques, Soares, Ana Prates, Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima, Martins, Lidia Parsekian, Gandini Jr, Luiz Gonzaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Aim : To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN(r), Morelli(r), and Conexao(r)). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN(r), Morelli(r), and Conexao(r) mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN(r)presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli(r), SIN(r) and Conexao(r) presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN(r)mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants.
ISSN:1677-3225
1677-3225
DOI:10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a15