Loading…

Bottom/top hardness ratio and dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites

Aim: To evaluate the bottom/top hardness ratio (B/T) and the dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites in high c-factor preparations. Methods: Regular conventional (Tetric N-Ceram – TNC, and Polofil Supra – PFS), regular bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill – TBF, and Ad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian journal of oral sciences 2023-05, Vol.22
Main Authors: Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento, Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de, Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas, Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra
Format: Article
Language:eng ; por
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-3ef92a13089189f440428389937130fbcc98dea4e1d43b3b32f801aeb71098c43
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Brazilian journal of oral sciences
container_volume 22
creator Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento
Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de
Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas
Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra
description Aim: To evaluate the bottom/top hardness ratio (B/T) and the dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites in high c-factor preparations. Methods: Regular conventional (Tetric N-Ceram – TNC, and Polofil Supra – PFS), regular bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill – TBF, and Admira Fusion X-tra – AFX), and low viscosity bulk-fill resin composites (Tetric N-flow – TNF, and X-tra Base – XTB) were used to restore 180 dentin conical preparations. The specimens were randomly distributed in 12 groups (n = 15) according to the resin composites and storage time-points (24 h and six months) tested. After 24 h storage, all specimens were subjected to the bottom/top hardness ratio analysis. Then, the push-out bond strength test was performed in half of the specimens and the other half were maintained for six months on water storage before testing. The failure modes were analyzed in a stereomicroscopic. The data were analyzed statistically using one- and two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test (p 0.05). Regardless of the storage timepoint, regular bulk-fill resin composites showed the highest bond strength values statistically (p
doi_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8667617
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1677_32252023000100325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1677_32252023000100325</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S1677_32252023000100325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-3ef92a13089189f440428389937130fbcc98dea4e1d43b3b32f801aeb71098c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOAzEMRSMEEqXwByzyA9M6j84kS6h4SZVYAOsok0kgZZpUSVqpf89M2wXywpbta10fhO4JzCgwWc_bdcyzPaUeYCbquqlJc4EmpG6ailG6uPxXX6ObnNcAnNacTJB9jKXEzbzELf7RqQs2Z5x08RHr0OHOhuIDbmPofPjGuejW974ccHTYxLAfxzHo_rjc7vrfyvm-x8nmQWXiZhuzLzbfoiun-2zvznmKvp6fPpev1er95W35sKoMWfBSMesk1YSBkERIx_ngUjAhJWuGpmuNkaKzmlvScdYOQZ0Aom3bEJDCcDZFs9PdbLzto1rHXRrcZfUx_q_G_ylQBgAEgNHFIOAngUkx52Sd2ia_0emgCKgjWzWyVSe26syW_QEo422W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bottom/top hardness ratio and dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites</title><source>SciELO</source><creator>Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento ; Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de ; Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas ; Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra</creator><creatorcontrib>Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento ; Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de ; Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas ; Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To evaluate the bottom/top hardness ratio (B/T) and the dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites in high c-factor preparations. Methods: Regular conventional (Tetric N-Ceram – TNC, and Polofil Supra – PFS), regular bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill – TBF, and Admira Fusion X-tra – AFX), and low viscosity bulk-fill resin composites (Tetric N-flow – TNF, and X-tra Base – XTB) were used to restore 180 dentin conical preparations. The specimens were randomly distributed in 12 groups (n = 15) according to the resin composites and storage time-points (24 h and six months) tested. After 24 h storage, all specimens were subjected to the bottom/top hardness ratio analysis. Then, the push-out bond strength test was performed in half of the specimens and the other half were maintained for six months on water storage before testing. The failure modes were analyzed in a stereomicroscopic. The data were analyzed statistically using one- and two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test (p &lt;0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the bottom/top hardness ratio among the resin composites (p&gt;0.05). Regardless of the storage timepoint, regular bulk-fill resin composites showed the highest bond strength values statistically (p&lt;0.05). Only conventional resin composites showed statistically lower bond strength values at six-month storage (p&lt;0.05). Adhesive failures were more predominant for low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Conclusion: Although the DoC was not affected by different materials tested, only bulk-fill resin composites did not present dentin bond strength loss after six-month of water storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1677-3225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1677-3225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8667617</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP</publisher><subject>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY &amp; MEDICINE</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of oral sciences, 2023-05, Vol.22</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-3ef92a13089189f440428389937130fbcc98dea4e1d43b3b32f801aeb71098c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4313-5776 ; 0000-0002-4968-1340 ; 0000-0002-3037-990X ; 0000-0001-9089-341X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra</creatorcontrib><title>Bottom/top hardness ratio and dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites</title><title>Brazilian journal of oral sciences</title><addtitle>Braz. J. Oral Sci</addtitle><description>Aim: To evaluate the bottom/top hardness ratio (B/T) and the dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites in high c-factor preparations. Methods: Regular conventional (Tetric N-Ceram – TNC, and Polofil Supra – PFS), regular bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill – TBF, and Admira Fusion X-tra – AFX), and low viscosity bulk-fill resin composites (Tetric N-flow – TNF, and X-tra Base – XTB) were used to restore 180 dentin conical preparations. The specimens were randomly distributed in 12 groups (n = 15) according to the resin composites and storage time-points (24 h and six months) tested. After 24 h storage, all specimens were subjected to the bottom/top hardness ratio analysis. Then, the push-out bond strength test was performed in half of the specimens and the other half were maintained for six months on water storage before testing. The failure modes were analyzed in a stereomicroscopic. The data were analyzed statistically using one- and two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test (p &lt;0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the bottom/top hardness ratio among the resin composites (p&gt;0.05). Regardless of the storage timepoint, regular bulk-fill resin composites showed the highest bond strength values statistically (p&lt;0.05). Only conventional resin composites showed statistically lower bond strength values at six-month storage (p&lt;0.05). Adhesive failures were more predominant for low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Conclusion: Although the DoC was not affected by different materials tested, only bulk-fill resin composites did not present dentin bond strength loss after six-month of water storage.</description><subject>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY &amp; MEDICINE</subject><issn>1677-3225</issn><issn>1677-3225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkMtOAzEMRSMEEqXwByzyA9M6j84kS6h4SZVYAOsok0kgZZpUSVqpf89M2wXywpbta10fhO4JzCgwWc_bdcyzPaUeYCbquqlJc4EmpG6ailG6uPxXX6ObnNcAnNacTJB9jKXEzbzELf7RqQs2Z5x08RHr0OHOhuIDbmPofPjGuejW974ccHTYxLAfxzHo_rjc7vrfyvm-x8nmQWXiZhuzLzbfoiun-2zvznmKvp6fPpev1er95W35sKoMWfBSMesk1YSBkERIx_ngUjAhJWuGpmuNkaKzmlvScdYOQZ0Aom3bEJDCcDZFs9PdbLzto1rHXRrcZfUx_q_G_ylQBgAEgNHFIOAngUkx52Sd2ia_0emgCKgjWzWyVSe26syW_QEo422W</recordid><startdate>20230529</startdate><enddate>20230529</enddate><creator>Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento</creator><creator>Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de</creator><creator>Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas</creator><creator>Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra</creator><general>Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4313-5776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-1340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-990X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-341X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230529</creationdate><title>Bottom/top hardness ratio and dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites</title><author>Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento ; Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de ; Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas ; Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-3ef92a13089189f440428389937130fbcc98dea4e1d43b3b32f801aeb71098c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY &amp; MEDICINE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of oral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marinho, Maria Eduarda Lima do Nascimento</au><au>Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier de</au><au>Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas</au><au>Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bottom/top hardness ratio and dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of oral sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Braz. J. Oral Sci</addtitle><date>2023-05-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><issn>1677-3225</issn><eissn>1677-3225</eissn><abstract>Aim: To evaluate the bottom/top hardness ratio (B/T) and the dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites in high c-factor preparations. Methods: Regular conventional (Tetric N-Ceram – TNC, and Polofil Supra – PFS), regular bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill – TBF, and Admira Fusion X-tra – AFX), and low viscosity bulk-fill resin composites (Tetric N-flow – TNF, and X-tra Base – XTB) were used to restore 180 dentin conical preparations. The specimens were randomly distributed in 12 groups (n = 15) according to the resin composites and storage time-points (24 h and six months) tested. After 24 h storage, all specimens were subjected to the bottom/top hardness ratio analysis. Then, the push-out bond strength test was performed in half of the specimens and the other half were maintained for six months on water storage before testing. The failure modes were analyzed in a stereomicroscopic. The data were analyzed statistically using one- and two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test (p &lt;0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the bottom/top hardness ratio among the resin composites (p&gt;0.05). Regardless of the storage timepoint, regular bulk-fill resin composites showed the highest bond strength values statistically (p&lt;0.05). Only conventional resin composites showed statistically lower bond strength values at six-month storage (p&lt;0.05). Adhesive failures were more predominant for low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Conclusion: Although the DoC was not affected by different materials tested, only bulk-fill resin composites did not present dentin bond strength loss after six-month of water storage.</abstract><pub>Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP</pub><doi>10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8667617</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4313-5776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-1340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-990X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-341X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1677-3225
ispartof Brazilian journal of oral sciences, 2023-05, Vol.22
issn 1677-3225
1677-3225
language eng ; por
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S1677_32252023000100325
source SciELO
subjects DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
title Bottom/top hardness ratio and dentin bonding stability of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A56%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bottom/top%20hardness%20ratio%20and%20dentin%20bonding%20stability%20of%20conventional%20and%20bulk-fill%20resin%20composites&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20oral%20sciences&rft.au=Marinho,%20Maria%20Eduarda%20Lima%20do%20Nascimento&rft.date=2023-05-29&rft.volume=22&rft.issn=1677-3225&rft.eissn=1677-3225&rft_id=info:doi/10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8667617&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES1677_32252023000100325%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-3ef92a13089189f440428389937130fbcc98dea4e1d43b3b32f801aeb71098c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1677_32252023000100325&rfr_iscdi=true