Loading…

HOCCO versus OCCO: Comparative spectroscopy of the radical and diradical reactive intermediates

We present a photoelectron imaging study of three glyoxal derivatives: the ethylenedione anion (OCCO−), ethynediolide (HOCCO−), and glyoxalide (OHCCO−). These anions provide access to the corresponding neutral reactive intermediates: the OCCO diradical and the HOCCO and OHCCO radicals. Contrasting t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of chemical physics 2016-06, Vol.144 (23), p.234305-234305
Main Authors: Dixon, Andrew R., Xue, Tian, Sanov, Andrei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3884e8a9bafe501c25eed1c5a73b013d7b3381685115f8da97e18c08ca1afcbb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3884e8a9bafe501c25eed1c5a73b013d7b3381685115f8da97e18c08ca1afcbb3
container_end_page 234305
container_issue 23
container_start_page 234305
container_title The Journal of chemical physics
container_volume 144
creator Dixon, Andrew R.
Xue, Tian
Sanov, Andrei
description We present a photoelectron imaging study of three glyoxal derivatives: the ethylenedione anion (OCCO−), ethynediolide (HOCCO−), and glyoxalide (OHCCO−). These anions provide access to the corresponding neutral reactive intermediates: the OCCO diradical and the HOCCO and OHCCO radicals. Contrasting the straightforward deprotonation pathway in the reaction of O− with glyoxal (OHCCHO), which is expected to yield glyoxalide (OHCCO−), OHCCO− is shown to be a minor product, with HOCCO− being the dominant observed isomer of the m/z = 57 anion. In the HOCCO/OHCCO anion photoelectron spectrum, we identify several electronic states of this radical system and determine the adiabatic electron affinity of HOCCO as 1.763(6) eV. This result is compared to the corresponding 1.936(8) eV value for ethylenedione (OCCO), reported in our recent study of this transient diradical [A. R. Dixon, T. Xue, and A. Sanov, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 8764–8767 (2015)]. Based on the comparison of the HOCCO−/OHCCO− and OCCO− photoelectron spectra, we discuss the contrasting effects of the hydrogen connected to the carbon framework or the terminal oxygen in OCCO.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.4953774
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4953774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2121774818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3884e8a9bafe501c25eed1c5a73b013d7b3381685115f8da97e18c08ca1afcbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UFrHCEYBmApLc027aF_oAi9NIVJ_HRGndzKkDaBwF6aszjON8SwO07VWci_r9vdJKfmpMLji74fIZ-BnQOT4gLO67YRStVvyAqYbislW_aWrBjjULWSyRPyIaUHxhgoXr8nJ1wJUYNkK2Ku1123pjuMaUl0v7-kXdjONtrsd0jTjC7HkFyYH2kYab5HGu3gnd1QOw108E-niNb9u-KnjHGLg7cZ00fybrSbhJ-O6ym5-3n1u7uubte_broft5WrAXIltK5R27a3IzYMHG8QB3CNVaJnIAbVC6FB6gagGfVgW4WgHdPOgh1d34tT8vWQG1L2Jjmf0d27ME3l-YZzKZmqVVHfDmqO4c-CKZutTw43GzthWJIB1baN5JKLl8Bn-hCWOJU_GA4cStkadFFnB-VKRyniaObotzY-GmBmPxsD5jibYr8cE5e-1PMsn4ZRwPcD2D-_1B-mV9P-i3chvkAzD6P4C5u1o7I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121774818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HOCCO versus OCCO: Comparative spectroscopy of the radical and diradical reactive intermediates</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><source>AIP_美国物理联合会现刊(与NSTL共建)</source><creator>Dixon, Andrew R. ; Xue, Tian ; Sanov, Andrei</creator><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Andrew R. ; Xue, Tian ; Sanov, Andrei</creatorcontrib><description>We present a photoelectron imaging study of three glyoxal derivatives: the ethylenedione anion (OCCO−), ethynediolide (HOCCO−), and glyoxalide (OHCCO−). These anions provide access to the corresponding neutral reactive intermediates: the OCCO diradical and the HOCCO and OHCCO radicals. Contrasting the straightforward deprotonation pathway in the reaction of O− with glyoxal (OHCCHO), which is expected to yield glyoxalide (OHCCO−), OHCCO− is shown to be a minor product, with HOCCO− being the dominant observed isomer of the m/z = 57 anion. In the HOCCO/OHCCO anion photoelectron spectrum, we identify several electronic states of this radical system and determine the adiabatic electron affinity of HOCCO as 1.763(6) eV. This result is compared to the corresponding 1.936(8) eV value for ethylenedione (OCCO), reported in our recent study of this transient diradical [A. R. Dixon, T. Xue, and A. Sanov, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 8764–8767 (2015)]. Based on the comparison of the HOCCO−/OHCCO− and OCCO− photoelectron spectra, we discuss the contrasting effects of the hydrogen connected to the carbon framework or the terminal oxygen in OCCO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4953774</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27334160</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>ANIONS ; Electron affinity ; Electron states ; EXPERIMENTAL DATA ; INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY ; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY ; Physics ; RADICALS ; Spectrum analysis</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2016-06, Vol.144 (23), p.234305-234305</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2016 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3884e8a9bafe501c25eed1c5a73b013d7b3381685115f8da97e18c08ca1afcbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3884e8a9bafe501c25eed1c5a73b013d7b3381685115f8da97e18c08ca1afcbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jcp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.4953774$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,782,784,795,885,27924,27925,76255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22660747$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanov, Andrei</creatorcontrib><title>HOCCO versus OCCO: Comparative spectroscopy of the radical and diradical reactive intermediates</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>We present a photoelectron imaging study of three glyoxal derivatives: the ethylenedione anion (OCCO−), ethynediolide (HOCCO−), and glyoxalide (OHCCO−). These anions provide access to the corresponding neutral reactive intermediates: the OCCO diradical and the HOCCO and OHCCO radicals. Contrasting the straightforward deprotonation pathway in the reaction of O− with glyoxal (OHCCHO), which is expected to yield glyoxalide (OHCCO−), OHCCO− is shown to be a minor product, with HOCCO− being the dominant observed isomer of the m/z = 57 anion. In the HOCCO/OHCCO anion photoelectron spectrum, we identify several electronic states of this radical system and determine the adiabatic electron affinity of HOCCO as 1.763(6) eV. This result is compared to the corresponding 1.936(8) eV value for ethylenedione (OCCO), reported in our recent study of this transient diradical [A. R. Dixon, T. Xue, and A. Sanov, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 8764–8767 (2015)]. Based on the comparison of the HOCCO−/OHCCO− and OCCO− photoelectron spectra, we discuss the contrasting effects of the hydrogen connected to the carbon framework or the terminal oxygen in OCCO.</description><subject>ANIONS</subject><subject>Electron affinity</subject><subject>Electron states</subject><subject>EXPERIMENTAL DATA</subject><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>RADICALS</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UFrHCEYBmApLc027aF_oAi9NIVJ_HRGndzKkDaBwF6aszjON8SwO07VWci_r9vdJKfmpMLji74fIZ-BnQOT4gLO67YRStVvyAqYbislW_aWrBjjULWSyRPyIaUHxhgoXr8nJ1wJUYNkK2Ku1123pjuMaUl0v7-kXdjONtrsd0jTjC7HkFyYH2kYab5HGu3gnd1QOw108E-niNb9u-KnjHGLg7cZ00fybrSbhJ-O6ym5-3n1u7uubte_broft5WrAXIltK5R27a3IzYMHG8QB3CNVaJnIAbVC6FB6gagGfVgW4WgHdPOgh1d34tT8vWQG1L2Jjmf0d27ME3l-YZzKZmqVVHfDmqO4c-CKZutTw43GzthWJIB1baN5JKLl8Bn-hCWOJU_GA4cStkadFFnB-VKRyniaObotzY-GmBmPxsD5jibYr8cE5e-1PMsn4ZRwPcD2D-_1B-mV9P-i3chvkAzD6P4C5u1o7I</recordid><startdate>20160621</startdate><enddate>20160621</enddate><creator>Dixon, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Xue, Tian</creator><creator>Sanov, Andrei</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160621</creationdate><title>HOCCO versus OCCO: Comparative spectroscopy of the radical and diradical reactive intermediates</title><author>Dixon, Andrew R. ; Xue, Tian ; Sanov, Andrei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3884e8a9bafe501c25eed1c5a73b013d7b3381685115f8da97e18c08ca1afcbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ANIONS</topic><topic>Electron affinity</topic><topic>Electron states</topic><topic>EXPERIMENTAL DATA</topic><topic>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>RADICALS</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanov, Andrei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dixon, Andrew R.</au><au>Xue, Tian</au><au>Sanov, Andrei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HOCCO versus OCCO: Comparative spectroscopy of the radical and diradical reactive intermediates</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2016-06-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>234305</spage><epage>234305</epage><pages>234305-234305</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><coden>JCPSA6</coden><abstract>We present a photoelectron imaging study of three glyoxal derivatives: the ethylenedione anion (OCCO−), ethynediolide (HOCCO−), and glyoxalide (OHCCO−). These anions provide access to the corresponding neutral reactive intermediates: the OCCO diradical and the HOCCO and OHCCO radicals. Contrasting the straightforward deprotonation pathway in the reaction of O− with glyoxal (OHCCHO), which is expected to yield glyoxalide (OHCCO−), OHCCO− is shown to be a minor product, with HOCCO− being the dominant observed isomer of the m/z = 57 anion. In the HOCCO/OHCCO anion photoelectron spectrum, we identify several electronic states of this radical system and determine the adiabatic electron affinity of HOCCO as 1.763(6) eV. This result is compared to the corresponding 1.936(8) eV value for ethylenedione (OCCO), reported in our recent study of this transient diradical [A. R. Dixon, T. Xue, and A. Sanov, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 8764–8767 (2015)]. Based on the comparison of the HOCCO−/OHCCO− and OCCO− photoelectron spectra, we discuss the contrasting effects of the hydrogen connected to the carbon framework or the terminal oxygen in OCCO.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>27334160</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.4953774</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9606
ispartof The Journal of chemical physics, 2016-06, Vol.144 (23), p.234305-234305
issn 0021-9606
1089-7690
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4953774
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list); AIP_美国物理联合会现刊(与NSTL共建)
subjects ANIONS
Electron affinity
Electron states
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY
Physics
RADICALS
Spectrum analysis
title HOCCO versus OCCO: Comparative spectroscopy of the radical and diradical reactive intermediates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HOCCO%20versus%20OCCO:%20Comparative%20spectroscopy%20of%20the%20radical%20and%20diradical%20reactive%20intermediates&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Dixon,%20Andrew%20R.&rft.date=2016-06-21&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=234305&rft.epage=234305&rft.pages=234305-234305&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft.coden=JCPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4953774&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2121774818%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3884e8a9bafe501c25eed1c5a73b013d7b3381685115f8da97e18c08ca1afcbb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121774818&rft_id=info:pmid/27334160&rfr_iscdi=true