Loading…

A comparative study on the performance of stainless-steel conical springs used in automotive suspension system

The Automotive suspension system is deployed to absorb the shock load vibrations due to undulations of the road surface. For vehicles like car, Helical coil springs along with dampers are used in the suspension system. It is expected to perform its function without affecting the stability, steering...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexis, S. John
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2446
creator Alexis, S. John
description The Automotive suspension system is deployed to absorb the shock load vibrations due to undulations of the road surface. For vehicles like car, Helical coil springs along with dampers are used in the suspension system. It is expected to perform its function without affecting the stability, steering or handling of the vehicle. The suspension springs belong to the open coil type. The conical spring is a type which has an advantage in the fact that it has a compact structure and good stability, and it is used for bearing larger load and vibration attenuation. This paper aims to assess the performance of Stainless-steelconical springs if used in four-wheeler suspension system. The values of Spring Stiffness, Deflection, Critical Buckling Load and Relative Critical Deflection are calculated for the conical springs and compared with the helical springs. The CAD model of the springs was done using Solid Works and the Finite Element Analysis was done using ANSYS Workbench. The static analysis was performed. The Load and Boundary conditions were specified. The Total Deformation, Factor of Safety, Equivalent Stress, and Maximum Shear Stress of the springs were noted. The results obtained are compared with those of a conventional open coil spring and applicability of the constructed springs to the chosen vehicle is studied depending on the results obtained.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0110761
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0110761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2741108988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2031-cadb65f1a62f666f42a97cf67522f1321e253cddbfc210cdcef4414f896a922b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAm7A1H7vZ3WMpWoWCFwVvIc0mumU3iZlsof_eSAvePM3APPMO8yB0S8mCEsEfqgWhlNSCnqEZrSpa5FacoxkhbVmwkn9coiuAHSGsretmhtwSaz8GFVXq9wZDmroD9g6nL4ODidbHUTltsLd5pno3GIACkjFD3nO9VgOGEHv3CXgC0-HeYTUlP_pj3ATBOOhzIBzy1niNLqwawNyc6hy9Pz2-rZ6Lzev6ZbXcFIERTgutuq2oLFWCWSGELZlqa21FXTFmKWfUsIrrrttazSjRnTa2LGlpm1aolrEtn6O7Y26I_nsykOTOT9Hlk5LVZTbUtE2TqfsjBbpPWYB3Mv8yqniQlMhfn7KSJ5__wXsf_0AZOst_AOJEeJE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2741108988</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparative study on the performance of stainless-steel conical springs used in automotive suspension system</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Alexis, S. John</creator><contributor>Sukanyadevi R ; Aranganayagam K. R. ; Geethakarthi A ; Sreeharan B. N.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Alexis, S. John ; Sukanyadevi R ; Aranganayagam K. R. ; Geethakarthi A ; Sreeharan B. N.</creatorcontrib><description>The Automotive suspension system is deployed to absorb the shock load vibrations due to undulations of the road surface. For vehicles like car, Helical coil springs along with dampers are used in the suspension system. It is expected to perform its function without affecting the stability, steering or handling of the vehicle. The suspension springs belong to the open coil type. The conical spring is a type which has an advantage in the fact that it has a compact structure and good stability, and it is used for bearing larger load and vibration attenuation. This paper aims to assess the performance of Stainless-steelconical springs if used in four-wheeler suspension system. The values of Spring Stiffness, Deflection, Critical Buckling Load and Relative Critical Deflection are calculated for the conical springs and compared with the helical springs. The CAD model of the springs was done using Solid Works and the Finite Element Analysis was done using ANSYS Workbench. The static analysis was performed. The Load and Boundary conditions were specified. The Total Deformation, Factor of Safety, Equivalent Stress, and Maximum Shear Stress of the springs were noted. The results obtained are compared with those of a conventional open coil spring and applicability of the constructed springs to the chosen vehicle is studied depending on the results obtained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0110761</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Boundary conditions ; Coils ; Comparative studies ; Dampers ; Deflection ; Finite element method ; Helical springs ; Safety factors ; Shear stress ; Shock loads ; Springs (elastic) ; Stainless steels ; Steering ; Stiffness ; Structural stability ; Suspension systems</subject><ispartof>AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, Vol.2446 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2022 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Sukanyadevi R</contributor><contributor>Aranganayagam K. R.</contributor><contributor>Geethakarthi A</contributor><contributor>Sreeharan B. N.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Alexis, S. John</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on the performance of stainless-steel conical springs used in automotive suspension system</title><title>AIP Conference Proceedings</title><description>The Automotive suspension system is deployed to absorb the shock load vibrations due to undulations of the road surface. For vehicles like car, Helical coil springs along with dampers are used in the suspension system. It is expected to perform its function without affecting the stability, steering or handling of the vehicle. The suspension springs belong to the open coil type. The conical spring is a type which has an advantage in the fact that it has a compact structure and good stability, and it is used for bearing larger load and vibration attenuation. This paper aims to assess the performance of Stainless-steelconical springs if used in four-wheeler suspension system. The values of Spring Stiffness, Deflection, Critical Buckling Load and Relative Critical Deflection are calculated for the conical springs and compared with the helical springs. The CAD model of the springs was done using Solid Works and the Finite Element Analysis was done using ANSYS Workbench. The static analysis was performed. The Load and Boundary conditions were specified. The Total Deformation, Factor of Safety, Equivalent Stress, and Maximum Shear Stress of the springs were noted. The results obtained are compared with those of a conventional open coil spring and applicability of the constructed springs to the chosen vehicle is studied depending on the results obtained.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Coils</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Dampers</subject><subject>Deflection</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Helical springs</subject><subject>Safety factors</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Shock loads</subject><subject>Springs (elastic)</subject><subject>Stainless steels</subject><subject>Steering</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Structural stability</subject><subject>Suspension systems</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAm7A1H7vZ3WMpWoWCFwVvIc0mumU3iZlsof_eSAvePM3APPMO8yB0S8mCEsEfqgWhlNSCnqEZrSpa5FacoxkhbVmwkn9coiuAHSGsretmhtwSaz8GFVXq9wZDmroD9g6nL4ODidbHUTltsLd5pno3GIACkjFD3nO9VgOGEHv3CXgC0-HeYTUlP_pj3ATBOOhzIBzy1niNLqwawNyc6hy9Pz2-rZ6Lzev6ZbXcFIERTgutuq2oLFWCWSGELZlqa21FXTFmKWfUsIrrrttazSjRnTa2LGlpm1aolrEtn6O7Y26I_nsykOTOT9Hlk5LVZTbUtE2TqfsjBbpPWYB3Mv8yqniQlMhfn7KSJ5__wXsf_0AZOst_AOJEeJE</recordid><startdate>20221129</startdate><enddate>20221129</enddate><creator>Alexis, S. John</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221129</creationdate><title>A comparative study on the performance of stainless-steel conical springs used in automotive suspension system</title><author>Alexis, S. John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2031-cadb65f1a62f666f42a97cf67522f1321e253cddbfc210cdcef4414f896a922b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Coils</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Dampers</topic><topic>Deflection</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Helical springs</topic><topic>Safety factors</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Shock loads</topic><topic>Springs (elastic)</topic><topic>Stainless steels</topic><topic>Steering</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Structural stability</topic><topic>Suspension systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alexis, S. John</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alexis, S. John</au><au>Sukanyadevi R</au><au>Aranganayagam K. R.</au><au>Geethakarthi A</au><au>Sreeharan B. N.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on the performance of stainless-steel conical springs used in automotive suspension system</atitle><btitle>AIP Conference Proceedings</btitle><date>2022-11-29</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2446</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>The Automotive suspension system is deployed to absorb the shock load vibrations due to undulations of the road surface. For vehicles like car, Helical coil springs along with dampers are used in the suspension system. It is expected to perform its function without affecting the stability, steering or handling of the vehicle. The suspension springs belong to the open coil type. The conical spring is a type which has an advantage in the fact that it has a compact structure and good stability, and it is used for bearing larger load and vibration attenuation. This paper aims to assess the performance of Stainless-steelconical springs if used in four-wheeler suspension system. The values of Spring Stiffness, Deflection, Critical Buckling Load and Relative Critical Deflection are calculated for the conical springs and compared with the helical springs. The CAD model of the springs was done using Solid Works and the Finite Element Analysis was done using ANSYS Workbench. The static analysis was performed. The Load and Boundary conditions were specified. The Total Deformation, Factor of Safety, Equivalent Stress, and Maximum Shear Stress of the springs were noted. The results obtained are compared with those of a conventional open coil spring and applicability of the constructed springs to the chosen vehicle is studied depending on the results obtained.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0110761</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, Vol.2446 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0110761
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Automobiles
Boundary conditions
Coils
Comparative studies
Dampers
Deflection
Finite element method
Helical springs
Safety factors
Shear stress
Shock loads
Springs (elastic)
Stainless steels
Steering
Stiffness
Structural stability
Suspension systems
title A comparative study on the performance of stainless-steel conical springs used in automotive suspension system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A26%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20the%20performance%20of%20stainless-steel%20conical%20springs%20used%20in%20automotive%20suspension%20system&rft.btitle=AIP%20Conference%20Proceedings&rft.au=Alexis,%20S.%20John&rft.date=2022-11-29&rft.volume=2446&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0110761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2741108988%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2031-cadb65f1a62f666f42a97cf67522f1321e253cddbfc210cdcef4414f896a922b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2741108988&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true