Loading…
Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method
A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 4...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 3193 |
creator | Shambhavi, V. P. Shankar, V. Siva |
description | A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0232771 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0232771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3126775073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-c422dcbbd4f5622de1164335ca355d8a89b74a48023a73b83cf17cb2a383ee083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM9LwzAYhoMoOKcH_4OAFxU6k3xN0x1l-AsGXnbwVr6mqc3Ymi5JJ_3vjczT-x5eXngeQm45W3BWwJNcMAFCKX5GZlxKnqmCF-dkxtgyz0QOX5fkKoQtY2KpVDkjh5XbD-gx2qOh2ONuCjZQ19LYGTp4F43tqXZ9NH2kqeLRaWwcbf1oI71f4-hRGzQP9MfGjkaPE238ZPvv9NbQzkWK1lN3ND3dm9i55ppctLgL5uY_52Tz-rJZvWfrz7eP1fM6Gwrgmc6FaHRdN3kri1QN50UOIDWClE2J5bJWOeZlokUFdQm65UrXAqEEY1gJc3J3uk0Qh9GEWG3d6BNgqICLQinJFKTV42kVtI1Jguurwds9-qnirPozWsnq3yj8Ap5paJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3126775073</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Shambhavi, V. P. ; Shankar, V. Siva</creator><contributor>Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shambhavi, V. P. ; Shankar, V. Siva ; Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p<0.05). It may be concluded that a tray dryer is superior to an oven dryer in terms of both speed and efficiency. It is more effective for food samples to preserve protein when they are dried in a tray. Because of this, tray drying is the method of choice for enhancing the flavour of foods that have been dried.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0232771</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Drying ovens ; Flavors ; High temperature air ; Proteins ; Samples ; Statistical significance</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Srinivasan, R</contributor><contributor>Balasubramanian, PL</contributor><contributor>Seenivasan, M</contributor><contributor>Sharma, T. Rakesh</contributor><contributor>Vijayan, V.</contributor><contributor>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shambhavi, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, V. Siva</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p<0.05). It may be concluded that a tray dryer is superior to an oven dryer in terms of both speed and efficiency. It is more effective for food samples to preserve protein when they are dried in a tray. Because of this, tray drying is the method of choice for enhancing the flavour of foods that have been dried.</description><subject>Drying ovens</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>High temperature air</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM9LwzAYhoMoOKcH_4OAFxU6k3xN0x1l-AsGXnbwVr6mqc3Ymi5JJ_3vjczT-x5eXngeQm45W3BWwJNcMAFCKX5GZlxKnqmCF-dkxtgyz0QOX5fkKoQtY2KpVDkjh5XbD-gx2qOh2ONuCjZQ19LYGTp4F43tqXZ9NH2kqeLRaWwcbf1oI71f4-hRGzQP9MfGjkaPE238ZPvv9NbQzkWK1lN3ND3dm9i55ppctLgL5uY_52Tz-rJZvWfrz7eP1fM6Gwrgmc6FaHRdN3kri1QN50UOIDWClE2J5bJWOeZlokUFdQm65UrXAqEEY1gJc3J3uk0Qh9GEWG3d6BNgqICLQinJFKTV42kVtI1Jguurwds9-qnirPozWsnq3yj8Ap5paJQ</recordid><startdate>20241111</startdate><enddate>20241111</enddate><creator>Shambhavi, V. P.</creator><creator>Shankar, V. Siva</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241111</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</title><author>Shambhavi, V. P. ; Shankar, V. Siva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-c422dcbbd4f5622de1164335ca355d8a89b74a48023a73b83cf17cb2a383ee083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Drying ovens</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>High temperature air</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shambhavi, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, V. Siva</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shambhavi, V. P.</au><au>Shankar, V. Siva</au><au>Srinivasan, R</au><au>Balasubramanian, PL</au><au>Seenivasan, M</au><au>Sharma, T. Rakesh</au><au>Vijayan, V.</au><au>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-11-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3193</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p<0.05). It may be concluded that a tray dryer is superior to an oven dryer in terms of both speed and efficiency. It is more effective for food samples to preserve protein when they are dried in a tray. Because of this, tray drying is the method of choice for enhancing the flavour of foods that have been dried.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0232771</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0232771 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | Drying ovens Flavors High temperature air Proteins Samples Statistical significance |
title | Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20the%20protein%20content%20in%20avocado%20fruit%20(Lauraceae)%20with%20tray%20drying%20and%20hot%20air%20oven%20method&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Shambhavi,%20V.%20P.&rft.date=2024-11-11&rft.volume=3193&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0232771&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3126775073%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-c422dcbbd4f5622de1164335ca355d8a89b74a48023a73b83cf17cb2a383ee083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126775073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |