Loading…

Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method

A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 4...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shambhavi, V. P., Shankar, V. Siva
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 3193
creator Shambhavi, V. P.
Shankar, V. Siva
description A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0232771
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0232771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3126775073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-c422dcbbd4f5622de1164335ca355d8a89b74a48023a73b83cf17cb2a383ee083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM9LwzAYhoMoOKcH_4OAFxU6k3xN0x1l-AsGXnbwVr6mqc3Ymi5JJ_3vjczT-x5eXngeQm45W3BWwJNcMAFCKX5GZlxKnqmCF-dkxtgyz0QOX5fkKoQtY2KpVDkjh5XbD-gx2qOh2ONuCjZQ19LYGTp4F43tqXZ9NH2kqeLRaWwcbf1oI71f4-hRGzQP9MfGjkaPE238ZPvv9NbQzkWK1lN3ND3dm9i55ppctLgL5uY_52Tz-rJZvWfrz7eP1fM6Gwrgmc6FaHRdN3kri1QN50UOIDWClE2J5bJWOeZlokUFdQm65UrXAqEEY1gJc3J3uk0Qh9GEWG3d6BNgqICLQinJFKTV42kVtI1Jguurwds9-qnirPozWsnq3yj8Ap5paJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3126775073</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Shambhavi, V. P. ; Shankar, V. Siva</creator><contributor>Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shambhavi, V. P. ; Shankar, V. Siva ; Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p&lt;0.05). It may be concluded that a tray dryer is superior to an oven dryer in terms of both speed and efficiency. It is more effective for food samples to preserve protein when they are dried in a tray. Because of this, tray drying is the method of choice for enhancing the flavour of foods that have been dried.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0232771</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Drying ovens ; Flavors ; High temperature air ; Proteins ; Samples ; Statistical significance</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Srinivasan, R</contributor><contributor>Balasubramanian, PL</contributor><contributor>Seenivasan, M</contributor><contributor>Sharma, T. Rakesh</contributor><contributor>Vijayan, V.</contributor><contributor>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shambhavi, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, V. Siva</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p&lt;0.05). It may be concluded that a tray dryer is superior to an oven dryer in terms of both speed and efficiency. It is more effective for food samples to preserve protein when they are dried in a tray. Because of this, tray drying is the method of choice for enhancing the flavour of foods that have been dried.</description><subject>Drying ovens</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>High temperature air</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM9LwzAYhoMoOKcH_4OAFxU6k3xN0x1l-AsGXnbwVr6mqc3Ymi5JJ_3vjczT-x5eXngeQm45W3BWwJNcMAFCKX5GZlxKnqmCF-dkxtgyz0QOX5fkKoQtY2KpVDkjh5XbD-gx2qOh2ONuCjZQ19LYGTp4F43tqXZ9NH2kqeLRaWwcbf1oI71f4-hRGzQP9MfGjkaPE238ZPvv9NbQzkWK1lN3ND3dm9i55ppctLgL5uY_52Tz-rJZvWfrz7eP1fM6Gwrgmc6FaHRdN3kri1QN50UOIDWClE2J5bJWOeZlokUFdQm65UrXAqEEY1gJc3J3uk0Qh9GEWG3d6BNgqICLQinJFKTV42kVtI1Jguurwds9-qnirPozWsnq3yj8Ap5paJQ</recordid><startdate>20241111</startdate><enddate>20241111</enddate><creator>Shambhavi, V. P.</creator><creator>Shankar, V. Siva</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241111</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</title><author>Shambhavi, V. P. ; Shankar, V. Siva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-c422dcbbd4f5622de1164335ca355d8a89b74a48023a73b83cf17cb2a383ee083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Drying ovens</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>High temperature air</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shambhavi, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, V. Siva</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shambhavi, V. P.</au><au>Shankar, V. Siva</au><au>Srinivasan, R</au><au>Balasubramanian, PL</au><au>Seenivasan, M</au><au>Sharma, T. Rakesh</au><au>Vijayan, V.</au><au>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-11-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3193</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>A comparison of the drying methods of the tray and the hot air oven for avocado fruit (Lauraceae) in terms of the amount of protein present (g/100 g) is the objective of this study. Materials and Methods of Procedure: When we were analysing fresh avocado samples, we utilised the oven-dry method at 40 degrees Celsius for three hours, the tray-dry method at fifty degrees Celsius for five hours, and the microwave-dry method at sixty degrees Celsius for seven hours. Twenty samples were taken from each of the groups, bringing the total number of samples obtained to forty. Through the utilisation of Lowry’s methodology, we were able to ascertain the amount of protein (g/100 g) that was present in the dried avocado samples. At a level of confidence of 80 percent, a level of confidence of 95 percent, and an alpha of 0.05, the g-power is utilised in the process of selecting the sample size. Results: As a result of the comparison between the revolutionary tray dryer (2.45 g/100 g) and oven drying (2.46 g/100 g) of avocado (T7=60 °C for three hours), the data regarding the protein content indicate that the later method produced the best values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the oven drying approach and the revolutionary tray drying technique, as evidenced by the two-tailed significant values. This difference was found to be statistically significant at the level of p=0.003 (p&lt;0.05). It may be concluded that a tray dryer is superior to an oven dryer in terms of both speed and efficiency. It is more effective for food samples to preserve protein when they are dried in a tray. Because of this, tray drying is the method of choice for enhancing the flavour of foods that have been dried.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0232771</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0232771
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Drying ovens
Flavors
High temperature air
Proteins
Samples
Statistical significance
title Comparative analysis of the protein content in avocado fruit (Lauraceae) with tray drying and hot air oven method
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20the%20protein%20content%20in%20avocado%20fruit%20(Lauraceae)%20with%20tray%20drying%20and%20hot%20air%20oven%20method&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Shambhavi,%20V.%20P.&rft.date=2024-11-11&rft.volume=3193&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0232771&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3126775073%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-c422dcbbd4f5622de1164335ca355d8a89b74a48023a73b83cf17cb2a383ee083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126775073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true