Loading…
Innovative comparison of coated carbide drill bit against HSS drill bit to minimize surface roughness in the novel CNC drilling of magnesium alloy/silicon carbide composite
This research examines the differences and similarities between coated carbide drill bits and HSS drill bits, two typical tools used in new CNC drilling methods. The goal of this research is to minimise the surface roughness of composites. Methodologies and Instruments for Research: A stir casting p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 3193 |
creator | Karthik, A. Muniappan, A. |
description | This research examines the differences and similarities between coated carbide drill bits and HSS drill bits, two typical tools used in new CNC drilling methods. The goal of this research is to minimise the surface roughness of composites. Methodologies and Instruments for Research: A stir casting procedure that comprised 5 percent SiC and 95 percent magnesium alloy was used to generate the work material for the study that was conducted on the revolutionary CNC drilling technology. One of the groups was the control group, which was made up of HSS, while the other group was the group that was given coated carbide (experimental group). In order to establish the sample size, the G power calculation was performed using an alpha of 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95 percent. The percentage of confidence was set at 80 percent. In both the control group and the experimental group, there were nine people in the sample. According to the findings of the tests, the surface roughness of HSS was measured to be 3.7 µm, whereas the surface roughness of carbide was found to be 2.5 µm. At a confidence level of 95 percent, the difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0233059 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0233059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3127406941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p639-452cb17c82a5810fa26ca51ab4a49b307f23808d12024b291f9fff00c4d2b10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkctKBDEQRYMoOI4u_IOAO6GdyqNfSxl8gehCF-6adDoZS7qTMUkP6Df5kfYwI7gqqrhV51KXkHMGVwwKscivgAsBeX1AZizPWVYWrDgkM4BaZlyKt2NyEuMHAK_LspqRnwfn_EYl3Biq_bBWAaN31NupU8l0VKvQYmdoF7DvaYuJqpVCFxO9f3n5N02eDuhwwG9D4xis0oYGP67enYmRoqPp3dAJZXq6fFruFtGttqRBrSYRjgNVfe-_FhF71JOJP_TWl4-YzCk5sqqP5mxf5-T19uZ1eZ89Pt89LK8fs3Uh6kzmXLes1BVXecXAKl5olTPVSiXrVkBpuaig6hgHLlteM1tbawG07HjLwIg5udidXQf_OZqYmg8_BjcRG8F4KaGoJZtUlztV1JimB3rXrAMOKnw1DJptGE3e7MMQv2OvfqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3127406941</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Innovative comparison of coated carbide drill bit against HSS drill bit to minimize surface roughness in the novel CNC drilling of magnesium alloy/silicon carbide composite</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Karthik, A. ; Muniappan, A.</creator><contributor>Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Karthik, A. ; Muniappan, A. ; Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</creatorcontrib><description>This research examines the differences and similarities between coated carbide drill bits and HSS drill bits, two typical tools used in new CNC drilling methods. The goal of this research is to minimise the surface roughness of composites. Methodologies and Instruments for Research: A stir casting procedure that comprised 5 percent SiC and 95 percent magnesium alloy was used to generate the work material for the study that was conducted on the revolutionary CNC drilling technology. One of the groups was the control group, which was made up of HSS, while the other group was the group that was given coated carbide (experimental group). In order to establish the sample size, the G power calculation was performed using an alpha of 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95 percent. The percentage of confidence was set at 80 percent. In both the control group and the experimental group, there were nine people in the sample. According to the findings of the tests, the surface roughness of HSS was measured to be 3.7 µm, whereas the surface roughness of carbide was found to be 2.5 µm. At a confidence level of 95 percent, the difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001; p<0.05). It is discovered that there is a link between the two sets of data that is statistically significant. In this particular investigation, the carbide drill bit resulted in a surface that was more abrasive than the HSS drill bit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0233059</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Carbide tools ; Confidence intervals ; Control equipment ; Drill bits ; Drilling ; Group theory ; Magnesium alloys ; Magnesium base alloys ; Silicon carbide ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical significance ; Surface roughness</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Srinivasan, R</contributor><contributor>Balasubramanian, PL</contributor><contributor>Seenivasan, M</contributor><contributor>Sharma, T. Rakesh</contributor><contributor>Vijayan, V.</contributor><contributor>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Karthik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muniappan, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Innovative comparison of coated carbide drill bit against HSS drill bit to minimize surface roughness in the novel CNC drilling of magnesium alloy/silicon carbide composite</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>This research examines the differences and similarities between coated carbide drill bits and HSS drill bits, two typical tools used in new CNC drilling methods. The goal of this research is to minimise the surface roughness of composites. Methodologies and Instruments for Research: A stir casting procedure that comprised 5 percent SiC and 95 percent magnesium alloy was used to generate the work material for the study that was conducted on the revolutionary CNC drilling technology. One of the groups was the control group, which was made up of HSS, while the other group was the group that was given coated carbide (experimental group). In order to establish the sample size, the G power calculation was performed using an alpha of 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95 percent. The percentage of confidence was set at 80 percent. In both the control group and the experimental group, there were nine people in the sample. According to the findings of the tests, the surface roughness of HSS was measured to be 3.7 µm, whereas the surface roughness of carbide was found to be 2.5 µm. At a confidence level of 95 percent, the difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001; p<0.05). It is discovered that there is a link between the two sets of data that is statistically significant. In this particular investigation, the carbide drill bit resulted in a surface that was more abrasive than the HSS drill bit.</description><subject>Carbide tools</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Control equipment</subject><subject>Drill bits</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Group theory</subject><subject>Magnesium alloys</subject><subject>Magnesium base alloys</subject><subject>Silicon carbide</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkctKBDEQRYMoOI4u_IOAO6GdyqNfSxl8gehCF-6adDoZS7qTMUkP6Df5kfYwI7gqqrhV51KXkHMGVwwKscivgAsBeX1AZizPWVYWrDgkM4BaZlyKt2NyEuMHAK_LspqRnwfn_EYl3Biq_bBWAaN31NupU8l0VKvQYmdoF7DvaYuJqpVCFxO9f3n5N02eDuhwwG9D4xis0oYGP67enYmRoqPp3dAJZXq6fFruFtGttqRBrSYRjgNVfe-_FhF71JOJP_TWl4-YzCk5sqqP5mxf5-T19uZ1eZ89Pt89LK8fs3Uh6kzmXLes1BVXecXAKl5olTPVSiXrVkBpuaig6hgHLlteM1tbawG07HjLwIg5udidXQf_OZqYmg8_BjcRG8F4KaGoJZtUlztV1JimB3rXrAMOKnw1DJptGE3e7MMQv2OvfqQ</recordid><startdate>20241111</startdate><enddate>20241111</enddate><creator>Karthik, A.</creator><creator>Muniappan, A.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241111</creationdate><title>Innovative comparison of coated carbide drill bit against HSS drill bit to minimize surface roughness in the novel CNC drilling of magnesium alloy/silicon carbide composite</title><author>Karthik, A. ; Muniappan, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p639-452cb17c82a5810fa26ca51ab4a49b307f23808d12024b291f9fff00c4d2b10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Carbide tools</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Control equipment</topic><topic>Drill bits</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Group theory</topic><topic>Magnesium alloys</topic><topic>Magnesium base alloys</topic><topic>Silicon carbide</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karthik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muniappan, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karthik, A.</au><au>Muniappan, A.</au><au>Srinivasan, R</au><au>Balasubramanian, PL</au><au>Seenivasan, M</au><au>Sharma, T. Rakesh</au><au>Vijayan, V.</au><au>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Innovative comparison of coated carbide drill bit against HSS drill bit to minimize surface roughness in the novel CNC drilling of magnesium alloy/silicon carbide composite</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-11-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3193</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>This research examines the differences and similarities between coated carbide drill bits and HSS drill bits, two typical tools used in new CNC drilling methods. The goal of this research is to minimise the surface roughness of composites. Methodologies and Instruments for Research: A stir casting procedure that comprised 5 percent SiC and 95 percent magnesium alloy was used to generate the work material for the study that was conducted on the revolutionary CNC drilling technology. One of the groups was the control group, which was made up of HSS, while the other group was the group that was given coated carbide (experimental group). In order to establish the sample size, the G power calculation was performed using an alpha of 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95 percent. The percentage of confidence was set at 80 percent. In both the control group and the experimental group, there were nine people in the sample. According to the findings of the tests, the surface roughness of HSS was measured to be 3.7 µm, whereas the surface roughness of carbide was found to be 2.5 µm. At a confidence level of 95 percent, the difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001; p<0.05). It is discovered that there is a link between the two sets of data that is statistically significant. In this particular investigation, the carbide drill bit resulted in a surface that was more abrasive than the HSS drill bit.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0233059</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0233059 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | Carbide tools Confidence intervals Control equipment Drill bits Drilling Group theory Magnesium alloys Magnesium base alloys Silicon carbide Statistical analysis Statistical significance Surface roughness |
title | Innovative comparison of coated carbide drill bit against HSS drill bit to minimize surface roughness in the novel CNC drilling of magnesium alloy/silicon carbide composite |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A15%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Innovative%20comparison%20of%20coated%20carbide%20drill%20bit%20against%20HSS%20drill%20bit%20to%20minimize%20surface%20roughness%20in%20the%20novel%20CNC%20drilling%20of%20magnesium%20alloy/silicon%20carbide%20composite&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Karthik,%20A.&rft.date=2024-11-11&rft.volume=3193&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0233059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3127406941%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p639-452cb17c82a5810fa26ca51ab4a49b307f23808d12024b291f9fff00c4d2b10e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3127406941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |