Loading…

Sci—Thur PM: YIS — 08: Comparison of New In‐Vivo Measurements for Dosimetry of Rb‐82 with Prior Blood Flow Model Predictions

Published radiation dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 include two In‐Vivo studies and two theoretical blood flow models, the results of which vary widely. Rb‐82 internal organ and effective doses with PET/CT in humans were determined and compared to the published estimates with emphasis given to the di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical Physics 2010-07, Vol.37 (7), p.3885-3885
Main Authors: Hunter, C, Ziadi, C, Etele, J, Hill, J, Beanlands, R, deKemp, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 3885
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3885
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 37
creator Hunter, C
Ziadi, C
Etele, J
Hill, J
Beanlands, R
deKemp, R
description Published radiation dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 include two In‐Vivo studies and two theoretical blood flow models, the results of which vary widely. Rb‐82 internal organ and effective doses with PET/CT in humans were determined and compared to the published estimates with emphasis given to the differences between in‐vivo measurements and blood flow model predictions. 26 cardiac patients and 4 normal subjects with no cardiac history were recruited. Dynamic 3D PET scans were acquired (GE Discovery RX/VCT) over 10 minutes following IV injection of 10 MBq/kg Rb‐82. Images were reconstructed using FORE‐OSEM and 8 mm Hann filter. Cardiac scans of the chest were acquired at rest for all 30 subjects, plus one additional scan of the Head, Neck, Abdomen, Pelvis, or Thighs. Mean Rb‐82 residence times were determined in 22 source organs using volumes‐of‐interest drawn on the fused PET/CT images. At least 4 samples were obtained in each source organ. Using ICRP 103, the male and female effective doses were 0.00074 and 0.00092 mSv/MBq respectively. The lungs were found to be the major contributors to the effective dose for all in‐vivo studies, whereas it was the thyroid for both blood flow models. These dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 are the first to be measured directly with PET/CT in humans, and are in agreement with the two in‐vivo measurements but 2 to 3 times lower than blood flow models. The new values derived from human studies suggest a typical effective dose of 0.6 mSv per scan with 3D PET.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.3476103
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_3476103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP6103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1773-d05f2e300c3b9ab57eb9c182fff0c90ce78d08082e3e497f1eb1c64151abf77b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1Kw0AQB_BFFKzVg28wV4XU2Xx0k960Wi00WmwVPIVks0tXkqzspobeevABPPiEfRJT2quehpn5MfAfQs4p9iil4RXteT7rU_QOSMf1mef4LkaHpIMY-Y7rY3BMTqx9R8S-F2CHfM242qx_5oulgWk8gLfxDNoeMBzAUJcfqVFWV6AlPIoGxtVm_f2qPjXEIrVLI0pR1RakNnCrrSpFbVZb-5y1LnShUfUCpka1-5tC6xxGhW4g1rko2rHIFa-VruwpOZJpYcXZvnbJy-huPnxwJk_34-H1xOGUtVFyDKQrPETuZVGaBUxkEaehK6VEHiEXLMwxxLA1wo-YpCKjvO_TgKaZZCzzuuRid5cbba0RMvkwqkzNKqGYbN-X0GT_vtY6O9uoQqz-hkk83fvLnbdc1ek21j_HfwFIOX_x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sci—Thur PM: YIS — 08: Comparison of New In‐Vivo Measurements for Dosimetry of Rb‐82 with Prior Blood Flow Model Predictions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hunter, C ; Ziadi, C ; Etele, J ; Hill, J ; Beanlands, R ; deKemp, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunter, C ; Ziadi, C ; Etele, J ; Hill, J ; Beanlands, R ; deKemp, R</creatorcontrib><description>Published radiation dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 include two In‐Vivo studies and two theoretical blood flow models, the results of which vary widely. Rb‐82 internal organ and effective doses with PET/CT in humans were determined and compared to the published estimates with emphasis given to the differences between in‐vivo measurements and blood flow model predictions. 26 cardiac patients and 4 normal subjects with no cardiac history were recruited. Dynamic 3D PET scans were acquired (GE Discovery RX/VCT) over 10 minutes following IV injection of 10 MBq/kg Rb‐82. Images were reconstructed using FORE‐OSEM and 8 mm Hann filter. Cardiac scans of the chest were acquired at rest for all 30 subjects, plus one additional scan of the Head, Neck, Abdomen, Pelvis, or Thighs. Mean Rb‐82 residence times were determined in 22 source organs using volumes‐of‐interest drawn on the fused PET/CT images. At least 4 samples were obtained in each source organ. Using ICRP 103, the male and female effective doses were 0.00074 and 0.00092 mSv/MBq respectively. The lungs were found to be the major contributors to the effective dose for all in‐vivo studies, whereas it was the thyroid for both blood flow models. These dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 are the first to be measured directly with PET/CT in humans, and are in agreement with the two in‐vivo measurements but 2 to 3 times lower than blood flow models. The new values derived from human studies suggest a typical effective dose of 0.6 mSv per scan with 3D PET.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3476103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Biomedical modeling ; Blood flow measurement ; Cardiac haemodynamics ; Computed tomography ; Dosimetry ; Haemodynamics ; Heart ; Medical imaging ; Positron emission tomography</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2010-07, Vol.37 (7), p.3885-3885</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunter, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziadi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etele, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beanlands, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deKemp, R</creatorcontrib><title>Sci—Thur PM: YIS — 08: Comparison of New In‐Vivo Measurements for Dosimetry of Rb‐82 with Prior Blood Flow Model Predictions</title><title>Medical Physics</title><description>Published radiation dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 include two In‐Vivo studies and two theoretical blood flow models, the results of which vary widely. Rb‐82 internal organ and effective doses with PET/CT in humans were determined and compared to the published estimates with emphasis given to the differences between in‐vivo measurements and blood flow model predictions. 26 cardiac patients and 4 normal subjects with no cardiac history were recruited. Dynamic 3D PET scans were acquired (GE Discovery RX/VCT) over 10 minutes following IV injection of 10 MBq/kg Rb‐82. Images were reconstructed using FORE‐OSEM and 8 mm Hann filter. Cardiac scans of the chest were acquired at rest for all 30 subjects, plus one additional scan of the Head, Neck, Abdomen, Pelvis, or Thighs. Mean Rb‐82 residence times were determined in 22 source organs using volumes‐of‐interest drawn on the fused PET/CT images. At least 4 samples were obtained in each source organ. Using ICRP 103, the male and female effective doses were 0.00074 and 0.00092 mSv/MBq respectively. The lungs were found to be the major contributors to the effective dose for all in‐vivo studies, whereas it was the thyroid for both blood flow models. These dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 are the first to be measured directly with PET/CT in humans, and are in agreement with the two in‐vivo measurements but 2 to 3 times lower than blood flow models. The new values derived from human studies suggest a typical effective dose of 0.6 mSv per scan with 3D PET.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Blood flow measurement</subject><subject>Cardiac haemodynamics</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Haemodynamics</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1Kw0AQB_BFFKzVg28wV4XU2Xx0k960Wi00WmwVPIVks0tXkqzspobeevABPPiEfRJT2quehpn5MfAfQs4p9iil4RXteT7rU_QOSMf1mef4LkaHpIMY-Y7rY3BMTqx9R8S-F2CHfM242qx_5oulgWk8gLfxDNoeMBzAUJcfqVFWV6AlPIoGxtVm_f2qPjXEIrVLI0pR1RakNnCrrSpFbVZb-5y1LnShUfUCpka1-5tC6xxGhW4g1rko2rHIFa-VruwpOZJpYcXZvnbJy-huPnxwJk_34-H1xOGUtVFyDKQrPETuZVGaBUxkEaehK6VEHiEXLMwxxLA1wo-YpCKjvO_TgKaZZCzzuuRid5cbba0RMvkwqkzNKqGYbN-X0GT_vtY6O9uoQqz-hkk83fvLnbdc1ek21j_HfwFIOX_x</recordid><startdate>201007</startdate><enddate>201007</enddate><creator>Hunter, C</creator><creator>Ziadi, C</creator><creator>Etele, J</creator><creator>Hill, J</creator><creator>Beanlands, R</creator><creator>deKemp, R</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201007</creationdate><title>Sci—Thur PM: YIS — 08: Comparison of New In‐Vivo Measurements for Dosimetry of Rb‐82 with Prior Blood Flow Model Predictions</title><author>Hunter, C ; Ziadi, C ; Etele, J ; Hill, J ; Beanlands, R ; deKemp, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1773-d05f2e300c3b9ab57eb9c182fff0c90ce78d08082e3e497f1eb1c64151abf77b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Blood flow measurement</topic><topic>Cardiac haemodynamics</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Haemodynamics</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunter, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziadi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etele, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beanlands, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deKemp, R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunter, C</au><au>Ziadi, C</au><au>Etele, J</au><au>Hill, J</au><au>Beanlands, R</au><au>deKemp, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sci—Thur PM: YIS — 08: Comparison of New In‐Vivo Measurements for Dosimetry of Rb‐82 with Prior Blood Flow Model Predictions</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2010-07</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3885</spage><epage>3885</epage><pages>3885-3885</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Published radiation dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 include two In‐Vivo studies and two theoretical blood flow models, the results of which vary widely. Rb‐82 internal organ and effective doses with PET/CT in humans were determined and compared to the published estimates with emphasis given to the differences between in‐vivo measurements and blood flow model predictions. 26 cardiac patients and 4 normal subjects with no cardiac history were recruited. Dynamic 3D PET scans were acquired (GE Discovery RX/VCT) over 10 minutes following IV injection of 10 MBq/kg Rb‐82. Images were reconstructed using FORE‐OSEM and 8 mm Hann filter. Cardiac scans of the chest were acquired at rest for all 30 subjects, plus one additional scan of the Head, Neck, Abdomen, Pelvis, or Thighs. Mean Rb‐82 residence times were determined in 22 source organs using volumes‐of‐interest drawn on the fused PET/CT images. At least 4 samples were obtained in each source organ. Using ICRP 103, the male and female effective doses were 0.00074 and 0.00092 mSv/MBq respectively. The lungs were found to be the major contributors to the effective dose for all in‐vivo studies, whereas it was the thyroid for both blood flow models. These dose estimates for Rubidium‐82 are the first to be measured directly with PET/CT in humans, and are in agreement with the two in‐vivo measurements but 2 to 3 times lower than blood flow models. The new values derived from human studies suggest a typical effective dose of 0.6 mSv per scan with 3D PET.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.3476103</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2010-07, Vol.37 (7), p.3885-3885
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_3476103
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Anatomy
Biomedical modeling
Blood flow measurement
Cardiac haemodynamics
Computed tomography
Dosimetry
Haemodynamics
Heart
Medical imaging
Positron emission tomography
title Sci—Thur PM: YIS — 08: Comparison of New In‐Vivo Measurements for Dosimetry of Rb‐82 with Prior Blood Flow Model Predictions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sci%E2%80%94Thur%20PM:%20YIS%20%E2%80%94%2008:%20Comparison%20of%20New%20In%E2%80%90Vivo%20Measurements%20for%20Dosimetry%20of%20Rb%E2%80%9082%20with%20Prior%20Blood%20Flow%20Model%20Predictions&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Hunter,%20C&rft.date=2010-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3885&rft.epage=3885&rft.pages=3885-3885&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3476103&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_scita%3EMP6103%3C/wiley_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1773-d05f2e300c3b9ab57eb9c182fff0c90ce78d08082e3e497f1eb1c64151abf77b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true