Loading…

Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs

Purpose: With recently introduced technical innovations for CT systems, the dose of CT scan acquisitions has been substantially reduced; even effective dose values below 1 mSv have been reported. Due to this development, dose of the localizer radiograph may contribute substantially to dose of the wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical Physics 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.084301-n/a
Main Authors: Schmidt, Bernhard, Saltybaeva, Natalia, Kolditz, Daniel, Kalender, Willi A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page 084301
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 40
creator Schmidt, Bernhard
Saltybaeva, Natalia
Kolditz, Daniel
Kalender, Willi A.
description Purpose: With recently introduced technical innovations for CT systems, the dose of CT scan acquisitions has been substantially reduced; even effective dose values below 1 mSv have been reported. Due to this development, dose of the localizer radiograph may contribute substantially to dose of the whole CT examination. Since there are only limited data in the literature regarding patient dose for the different types of localizer radiographs, patient dose values were estimated in our study by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations and compared to dose values of typical CT examinations. Methods: First, dose distributions were measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for three different body regions (head, thorax, abdomen-pelvic) and three positions of the x-ray tube (AP, PA, and lateral views); measured values were compared to simulated data using Monte Carlo techniques for validation purposes. Second, organ and effective dose values for the various investigated localizer radiograph scenarios were calculated and compared with published dose values for standard CT and low-dose CT examinations. Results: For the anthropomorphic phantom, deviations of the dose values between measured and calculated results were in the range of 15%. Organ and effective dose values showed a strong dependence on the tube position. The largest differences were observed for chest localizer radiographs in the female phantom for the dose to the breast (AP: 1.01 mGy vs PA: 0.24 mGy). Overall effective dose values were in the range of 0.04–0.42 mSv per localizer radiograph acquisition. Conclusions: In view of the technical dose-reducing innovations in CT, localizer radiographs may substantially contribute to the total dose of the whole CT examination, particularly in the case of dedicated low-dose scans used, e.g., for young patients or screening purposes. Optimization of dose in localizer radiographs should be pursued further in the same way as it was done in CT.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4813296
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4813296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1419343977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3196-e19ee41479aba0797058ae8bfa29b9272f7f17d48d4dd5ed5a1b66ab2797ec903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90N9LwzAQB_AgipvTB_8B6aMInbkkbZrHMfwFE32YzyFtrlppl5q0yvzr7dgUX_TpAvfJcfcl5BToFACyS5iKDDhT6R4ZMyF5LBhV-2RMqRIxEzQZkaMQXimlKU_oIRkxrpjkqRiTbBYChtDgqotcGbWmqzZP6wJGpXdNNF9GtStMXX2ij7yxlXv2pn0Jx-SgNHXAk12dkKfrq-X8Nl483NzNZ4u45aDSGEEhChBSmdxQqSRNMoNZXhqm8mEJVsoSpBWZFdYmaBMDeZqanA0UC0X5hJxv57bevfUYOt1UocC6Nit0fdAgQHHBlZQDPdvRPm_Q6tZXjfFr_X3tAOIt-KhqXP_0gepNjBr0LkZ9_7gpg7_Y-lBU3ZCMW_395z_87vyv4a0t-RfMen55</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1419343977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Schmidt, Bernhard ; Saltybaeva, Natalia ; Kolditz, Daniel ; Kalender, Willi A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Bernhard ; Saltybaeva, Natalia ; Kolditz, Daniel ; Kalender, Willi A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: With recently introduced technical innovations for CT systems, the dose of CT scan acquisitions has been substantially reduced; even effective dose values below 1 mSv have been reported. Due to this development, dose of the localizer radiograph may contribute substantially to dose of the whole CT examination. Since there are only limited data in the literature regarding patient dose for the different types of localizer radiographs, patient dose values were estimated in our study by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations and compared to dose values of typical CT examinations. Methods: First, dose distributions were measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for three different body regions (head, thorax, abdomen-pelvic) and three positions of the x-ray tube (AP, PA, and lateral views); measured values were compared to simulated data using Monte Carlo techniques for validation purposes. Second, organ and effective dose values for the various investigated localizer radiograph scenarios were calculated and compared with published dose values for standard CT and low-dose CT examinations. Results: For the anthropomorphic phantom, deviations of the dose values between measured and calculated results were in the range of 15%. Organ and effective dose values showed a strong dependence on the tube position. The largest differences were observed for chest localizer radiographs in the female phantom for the dose to the breast (AP: 1.01 mGy vs PA: 0.24 mGy). Overall effective dose values were in the range of 0.04–0.42 mSv per localizer radiograph acquisition. Conclusions: In view of the technical dose-reducing innovations in CT, localizer radiographs may substantially contribute to the total dose of the whole CT examination, particularly in the case of dedicated low-dose scans used, e.g., for young patients or screening purposes. Optimization of dose in localizer radiographs should be pursued further in the same way as it was done in CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4813296</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23927364</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomy ; Cancer ; Collimation ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; Dose‐volume analysis ; dosimetry ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; Image scanners ; localizer radiograph ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Monte Carlo dose simulations ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Numerical optimization ; optimisation ; phantoms ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; radiation dose ; Radiography ; Thermoluminescent dosimeters ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.084301-n/a</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltybaeva, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolditz, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalender, Willi A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs</title><title>Medical Physics</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: With recently introduced technical innovations for CT systems, the dose of CT scan acquisitions has been substantially reduced; even effective dose values below 1 mSv have been reported. Due to this development, dose of the localizer radiograph may contribute substantially to dose of the whole CT examination. Since there are only limited data in the literature regarding patient dose for the different types of localizer radiographs, patient dose values were estimated in our study by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations and compared to dose values of typical CT examinations. Methods: First, dose distributions were measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for three different body regions (head, thorax, abdomen-pelvic) and three positions of the x-ray tube (AP, PA, and lateral views); measured values were compared to simulated data using Monte Carlo techniques for validation purposes. Second, organ and effective dose values for the various investigated localizer radiograph scenarios were calculated and compared with published dose values for standard CT and low-dose CT examinations. Results: For the anthropomorphic phantom, deviations of the dose values between measured and calculated results were in the range of 15%. Organ and effective dose values showed a strong dependence on the tube position. The largest differences were observed for chest localizer radiographs in the female phantom for the dose to the breast (AP: 1.01 mGy vs PA: 0.24 mGy). Overall effective dose values were in the range of 0.04–0.42 mSv per localizer radiograph acquisition. Conclusions: In view of the technical dose-reducing innovations in CT, localizer radiographs may substantially contribute to the total dose of the whole CT examination, particularly in the case of dedicated low-dose scans used, e.g., for young patients or screening purposes. Optimization of dose in localizer radiographs should be pursued further in the same way as it was done in CT.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Collimation</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>Dose‐volume analysis</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image scanners</subject><subject>localizer radiograph</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Monte Carlo dose simulations</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Numerical optimization</subject><subject>optimisation</subject><subject>phantoms</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>radiation dose</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Thermoluminescent dosimeters</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90N9LwzAQB_AgipvTB_8B6aMInbkkbZrHMfwFE32YzyFtrlppl5q0yvzr7dgUX_TpAvfJcfcl5BToFACyS5iKDDhT6R4ZMyF5LBhV-2RMqRIxEzQZkaMQXimlKU_oIRkxrpjkqRiTbBYChtDgqotcGbWmqzZP6wJGpXdNNF9GtStMXX2ij7yxlXv2pn0Jx-SgNHXAk12dkKfrq-X8Nl483NzNZ4u45aDSGEEhChBSmdxQqSRNMoNZXhqm8mEJVsoSpBWZFdYmaBMDeZqanA0UC0X5hJxv57bevfUYOt1UocC6Nit0fdAgQHHBlZQDPdvRPm_Q6tZXjfFr_X3tAOIt-KhqXP_0gepNjBr0LkZ9_7gpg7_Y-lBU3ZCMW_395z_87vyv4a0t-RfMen55</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Schmidt, Bernhard</creator><creator>Saltybaeva, Natalia</creator><creator>Kolditz, Daniel</creator><creator>Kalender, Willi A.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs</title><author>Schmidt, Bernhard ; Saltybaeva, Natalia ; Kolditz, Daniel ; Kalender, Willi A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3196-e19ee41479aba0797058ae8bfa29b9272f7f17d48d4dd5ed5a1b66ab2797ec903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Collimation</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>Dose‐volume analysis</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image scanners</topic><topic>localizer radiograph</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Monte Carlo dose simulations</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Numerical optimization</topic><topic>optimisation</topic><topic>phantoms</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>radiation dose</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Thermoluminescent dosimeters</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltybaeva, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolditz, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalender, Willi A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidt, Bernhard</au><au>Saltybaeva, Natalia</au><au>Kolditz, Daniel</au><au>Kalender, Willi A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>084301</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>084301-n/a</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: With recently introduced technical innovations for CT systems, the dose of CT scan acquisitions has been substantially reduced; even effective dose values below 1 mSv have been reported. Due to this development, dose of the localizer radiograph may contribute substantially to dose of the whole CT examination. Since there are only limited data in the literature regarding patient dose for the different types of localizer radiographs, patient dose values were estimated in our study by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations and compared to dose values of typical CT examinations. Methods: First, dose distributions were measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for three different body regions (head, thorax, abdomen-pelvic) and three positions of the x-ray tube (AP, PA, and lateral views); measured values were compared to simulated data using Monte Carlo techniques for validation purposes. Second, organ and effective dose values for the various investigated localizer radiograph scenarios were calculated and compared with published dose values for standard CT and low-dose CT examinations. Results: For the anthropomorphic phantom, deviations of the dose values between measured and calculated results were in the range of 15%. Organ and effective dose values showed a strong dependence on the tube position. The largest differences were observed for chest localizer radiographs in the female phantom for the dose to the breast (AP: 1.01 mGy vs PA: 0.24 mGy). Overall effective dose values were in the range of 0.04–0.42 mSv per localizer radiograph acquisition. Conclusions: In view of the technical dose-reducing innovations in CT, localizer radiographs may substantially contribute to the total dose of the whole CT examination, particularly in the case of dedicated low-dose scans used, e.g., for young patients or screening purposes. Optimization of dose in localizer radiographs should be pursued further in the same way as it was done in CT.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>23927364</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4813296</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.084301-n/a
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4813296
source Wiley
subjects Adult
Anatomy
Cancer
Collimation
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
Dose‐volume analysis
dosimetry
Female
Heart
Humans
Image scanners
localizer radiograph
Male
Medical imaging
Monte Carlo dose simulations
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo methods
Numerical optimization
optimisation
phantoms
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Dosage
radiation dose
Radiography
Thermoluminescent dosimeters
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
title Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20patient%20dose%20from%20CT%20localizer%20radiographs&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Schmidt,%20Bernhard&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=084301&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=084301-n/a&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4813296&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E1419343977%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3196-e19ee41479aba0797058ae8bfa29b9272f7f17d48d4dd5ed5a1b66ab2797ec903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1419343977&rft_id=info:pmid/23927364&rfr_iscdi=true