SU‐E‐T‐674: Parameter Sensitivity Analysis of VMAT Planning for Spine SBRT

Purpose: To analyze the sensitivity of VMAT plan quality to various delivery parameters for spine SBRT. Methods: Ten spine patients, previously treated to 18 Gy in 1 fraction with 11 field IMRT plans generated using a Multi‐Criteria Optimization approach in Raystation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical Physics 2013-06, Vol.40 (6), p.361-361
Main Authors: Chen, H, Winey, BA, Daartz, J, Gierga, DP
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
Optimization
Protons
Radiation therapy
Science funding
Therapeutics
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: To analyze the sensitivity of VMAT plan quality to various delivery parameters for spine SBRT. Methods: Ten spine patients, previously treated to 18 Gy in 1 fraction with 11 field IMRT plans generated using a Multi‐Criteria Optimization approach in Raystation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden) were selected for this study. Optimal VMAT plans, of comparable quality were generated using dual partial arcs and defined as baseline plans. The sensitivity of plan quality on dose rate level (variable dose rates (VDR), discrete dose rates (DDR)), leaf speed constraints (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 cm/degree and no constraint), was tested. The effect of maximum dose rate, maximum delivery time, and fraction size (18Gy*1, 9Gy*2 and 2Gy*9) was also tested. The resulting VMAT plan quality was analyzed by comparing PTV homogeneity index and conformity number, and D1 of spinal cord. Results: A leaf speed constraint of less than 0.2 cm/degree will degrade PTV conformity and spinal cord sparing, and plan quality of leaf speed more than 0.6 cm/degree is close to that without any leaf speed constraint. The proper selection of VMAT delivery parameters allows VMAT plan quality to match IMRT. In addition, VMAT plan quality of VDR is superior to that of DDR when either maximum delivery time or maximum dose rate is increased. Conclusion: VMAT plan quality for spine SBRT depends on the combination of delivery time, fraction size, and leaf speed. The sensitivity of plan quality depends on dose per fraction and maximum delivery time. Funding support: NCI Federal Share Proton Beam Program Income Grant. Conflict of Interest:none.
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.4815101