THE ORIGINS OF NIGERIAN FEDERALISM: The Rikerian Theory and Beyond

Scholars of federalism have offered different reasons why federations are formed. One of the most notable works in this area is that of William H. Riker, who made no pretence about his attempt to build a general theory of federalism, particularly its origin, operation and significance. Central to th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Federal Governance 2013-07, Vol.10 (1), p.43-54
Main Author: Babalola, Dele
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Föderalismus
Rikerian Theory
Staat
staatliche Organisationsformen
Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Scholars of federalism have offered different reasons why federations are formed. One of the most notable works in this area is that of William H. Riker, who made no pretence about his attempt to build a general theory of federalism, particularly its origin, operation and significance. Central to the Rikerian theory is that federations are formed through a political bargain between two sets of rational politicians, and the motive for the federal bargain is principally military. This theory is predicated on the assumption that two conditions – the expansion condition, and the military condition – must be present for a federation to be formed. In reference to the Nigerian Federation established in 1954, Riker asserted that the expansionist ambition of Ghana and its then leader Kwame Nkrumah, was the main external threat that informed the formation of the Federation. The main aim in this paper is to argue that the Rikerian theory of federal formation is inadequate to explain the origin of the Nigerian Federation, especially in the light of the centripetal and centrifugal forces that combined to result in the Federation.
ISSN:1923-6158
1923-6158
DOI:10.24908/fg.v10i1.4549