Loading…

Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective

In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electronic markets 2024-12, Vol.34 (1), p.20, Article 20
Main Authors: Abbas, Antragama Ewa, van Velzen, Thomas, Ofe, Hosea, van de Kaa, Geerten, Zuiderwijk, Anneke, de Reuver, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Electronic markets
container_volume 34
creator Abbas, Antragama Ewa
van Velzen, Thomas
Ofe, Hosea
van de Kaa, Geerten
Zuiderwijk, Anneke
de Reuver, Mark
description In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as data ownership . Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through responsibility divisions , steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as control , security , and compliance mechanisms , thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared, privacy becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hh_52955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933844832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Pg0AUxInRxFr9Ap5IPBr07S7Lgrda_yZNvKg3s1mWB6WhLO5CTf30Qmn05um9TH4zmYznnRO4IgDi2hHKKQ-AhgFAlPCAHngTElIaxHECh_0PJAkiEZNj78S5FQCFBMTE-7jFrakzX5u6tabyzQatn6lW3fhzU2ts2k5V5XdZFzvVdwOAZVG3Wz-3Zu0Pki5VNSYo3foNWtegbssNnnpHuaocnu3v1Ht7uH-dPwWLl8fn-WwRaMahDTCKBWFhjkiESjnN4yzOUCSUC0EAIckJZgwoapGqjEUZ4ykLNWER44TqkE29yzHXfWHTpbKx5VrZrTSqlHfl-0waW8jlUnKacN7TFyPdWPPZoWvlynS27gtKmjAWh2HMaE_RkdLWOGcx_00lIIfR5Ti67EeXu9HlYGL7Ij1cF2j_ov9x_QBRR4Wr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933844832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Abbas, Antragama Ewa ; van Velzen, Thomas ; Ofe, Hosea ; van de Kaa, Geerten ; Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; de Reuver, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Antragama Ewa ; van Velzen, Thomas ; Ofe, Hosea ; van de Kaa, Geerten ; Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; de Reuver, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as data ownership . Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through responsibility divisions , steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as control , security , and compliance mechanisms , thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared, privacy becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-6781</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1422-8890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1422-8890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Compliance ; Concept formation ; Contract theory ; Data economy ; Data marketplaces ; Data sharing ; Data sovereignty ; e-Commerce/e-business ; Enforcement ; Frame analysis ; Information sharing ; IT in Business ; L86 ; Meta-platforms ; Ownership ; Privacy ; Research Paper ; Social contract ; Sovereignty</subject><ispartof>Electronic markets, 2024-12, Vol.34 (1), p.20, Article 20</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3944-1714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-52955$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Velzen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ofe, Hosea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kaa, Geerten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Reuver, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</title><title>Electronic markets</title><addtitle>Electron Markets</addtitle><description>In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as data ownership . Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through responsibility divisions , steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as control , security , and compliance mechanisms , thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared, privacy becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Contract theory</subject><subject>Data economy</subject><subject>Data marketplaces</subject><subject>Data sharing</subject><subject>Data sovereignty</subject><subject>e-Commerce/e-business</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>L86</subject><subject>Meta-platforms</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Social contract</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><issn>1019-6781</issn><issn>1422-8890</issn><issn>1422-8890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Pg0AUxInRxFr9Ap5IPBr07S7Lgrda_yZNvKg3s1mWB6WhLO5CTf30Qmn05um9TH4zmYznnRO4IgDi2hHKKQ-AhgFAlPCAHngTElIaxHECh_0PJAkiEZNj78S5FQCFBMTE-7jFrakzX5u6tabyzQatn6lW3fhzU2ts2k5V5XdZFzvVdwOAZVG3Wz-3Zu0Pki5VNSYo3foNWtegbssNnnpHuaocnu3v1Ht7uH-dPwWLl8fn-WwRaMahDTCKBWFhjkiESjnN4yzOUCSUC0EAIckJZgwoapGqjEUZ4ykLNWER44TqkE29yzHXfWHTpbKx5VrZrTSqlHfl-0waW8jlUnKacN7TFyPdWPPZoWvlynS27gtKmjAWh2HMaE_RkdLWOGcx_00lIIfR5Ti67EeXu9HlYGL7Ij1cF2j_ov9x_QBRR4Wr</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</creator><creator>van Velzen, Thomas</creator><creator>Ofe, Hosea</creator><creator>van de Kaa, Geerten</creator><creator>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creator><creator>de Reuver, Mark</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>AAXBQ</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D8Z</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-1714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</title><author>Abbas, Antragama Ewa ; van Velzen, Thomas ; Ofe, Hosea ; van de Kaa, Geerten ; Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; de Reuver, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Contract theory</topic><topic>Data economy</topic><topic>Data marketplaces</topic><topic>Data sharing</topic><topic>Data sovereignty</topic><topic>e-Commerce/e-business</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>L86</topic><topic>Meta-platforms</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Social contract</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Velzen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ofe, Hosea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kaa, Geerten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Reuver, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Halmstad full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Halmstad</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Electronic markets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</au><au>van Velzen, Thomas</au><au>Ofe, Hosea</au><au>van de Kaa, Geerten</au><au>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</au><au>de Reuver, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</atitle><jtitle>Electronic markets</jtitle><stitle>Electron Markets</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><pages>20-</pages><artnum>20</artnum><issn>1019-6781</issn><issn>1422-8890</issn><eissn>1422-8890</eissn><abstract>In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as data ownership . Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through responsibility divisions , steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as control , security , and compliance mechanisms , thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared, privacy becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-1714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1019-6781
ispartof Electronic markets, 2024-12, Vol.34 (1), p.20, Article 20
issn 1019-6781
1422-8890
1422-8890
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hh_52955
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Springer Link
subjects Business and Management
Compliance
Concept formation
Contract theory
Data economy
Data marketplaces
Data sharing
Data sovereignty
e-Commerce/e-business
Enforcement
Frame analysis
Information sharing
IT in Business
L86
Meta-platforms
Ownership
Privacy
Research Paper
Social contract
Sovereignty
title Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20control%20over%20data:%20Conceptualizing%20data%20sovereignty%20from%20a%20social%20contract%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20markets&rft.au=Abbas,%20Antragama%20Ewa&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.pages=20-&rft.artnum=20&rft.issn=1019-6781&rft.eissn=1422-8890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2933844832%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933844832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true