Loading…
Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective
In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory...
Saved in:
Published in: | Electronic markets 2024-12, Vol.34 (1), p.20, Article 20 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Electronic markets |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Abbas, Antragama Ewa van Velzen, Thomas Ofe, Hosea van de Kaa, Geerten Zuiderwijk, Anneke de Reuver, Mark |
description | In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as
data ownership
. Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through
responsibility divisions
, steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as
control
,
security
, and
compliance mechanisms
, thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared,
privacy
becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hh_52955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933844832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Pg0AUxInRxFr9Ap5IPBr07S7Lgrda_yZNvKg3s1mWB6WhLO5CTf30Qmn05um9TH4zmYznnRO4IgDi2hHKKQ-AhgFAlPCAHngTElIaxHECh_0PJAkiEZNj78S5FQCFBMTE-7jFrakzX5u6tabyzQatn6lW3fhzU2ts2k5V5XdZFzvVdwOAZVG3Wz-3Zu0Pki5VNSYo3foNWtegbssNnnpHuaocnu3v1Ht7uH-dPwWLl8fn-WwRaMahDTCKBWFhjkiESjnN4yzOUCSUC0EAIckJZgwoapGqjEUZ4ykLNWER44TqkE29yzHXfWHTpbKx5VrZrTSqlHfl-0waW8jlUnKacN7TFyPdWPPZoWvlynS27gtKmjAWh2HMaE_RkdLWOGcx_00lIIfR5Ti67EeXu9HlYGL7Ij1cF2j_ov9x_QBRR4Wr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933844832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Abbas, Antragama Ewa ; van Velzen, Thomas ; Ofe, Hosea ; van de Kaa, Geerten ; Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; de Reuver, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Antragama Ewa ; van Velzen, Thomas ; Ofe, Hosea ; van de Kaa, Geerten ; Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; de Reuver, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as
data ownership
. Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through
responsibility divisions
, steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as
control
,
security
, and
compliance mechanisms
, thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared,
privacy
becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-6781</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1422-8890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1422-8890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Compliance ; Concept formation ; Contract theory ; Data economy ; Data marketplaces ; Data sharing ; Data sovereignty ; e-Commerce/e-business ; Enforcement ; Frame analysis ; Information sharing ; IT in Business ; L86 ; Meta-platforms ; Ownership ; Privacy ; Research Paper ; Social contract ; Sovereignty</subject><ispartof>Electronic markets, 2024-12, Vol.34 (1), p.20, Article 20</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3944-1714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-52955$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Velzen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ofe, Hosea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kaa, Geerten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Reuver, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</title><title>Electronic markets</title><addtitle>Electron Markets</addtitle><description>In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as
data ownership
. Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through
responsibility divisions
, steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as
control
,
security
, and
compliance mechanisms
, thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared,
privacy
becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Contract theory</subject><subject>Data economy</subject><subject>Data marketplaces</subject><subject>Data sharing</subject><subject>Data sovereignty</subject><subject>e-Commerce/e-business</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>L86</subject><subject>Meta-platforms</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Social contract</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><issn>1019-6781</issn><issn>1422-8890</issn><issn>1422-8890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Pg0AUxInRxFr9Ap5IPBr07S7Lgrda_yZNvKg3s1mWB6WhLO5CTf30Qmn05um9TH4zmYznnRO4IgDi2hHKKQ-AhgFAlPCAHngTElIaxHECh_0PJAkiEZNj78S5FQCFBMTE-7jFrakzX5u6tabyzQatn6lW3fhzU2ts2k5V5XdZFzvVdwOAZVG3Wz-3Zu0Pki5VNSYo3foNWtegbssNnnpHuaocnu3v1Ht7uH-dPwWLl8fn-WwRaMahDTCKBWFhjkiESjnN4yzOUCSUC0EAIckJZgwoapGqjEUZ4ykLNWER44TqkE29yzHXfWHTpbKx5VrZrTSqlHfl-0waW8jlUnKacN7TFyPdWPPZoWvlynS27gtKmjAWh2HMaE_RkdLWOGcx_00lIIfR5Ti67EeXu9HlYGL7Ij1cF2j_ov9x_QBRR4Wr</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</creator><creator>van Velzen, Thomas</creator><creator>Ofe, Hosea</creator><creator>van de Kaa, Geerten</creator><creator>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creator><creator>de Reuver, Mark</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>AAXBQ</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D8Z</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-1714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</title><author>Abbas, Antragama Ewa ; van Velzen, Thomas ; Ofe, Hosea ; van de Kaa, Geerten ; Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; de Reuver, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Contract theory</topic><topic>Data economy</topic><topic>Data marketplaces</topic><topic>Data sharing</topic><topic>Data sovereignty</topic><topic>e-Commerce/e-business</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>L86</topic><topic>Meta-platforms</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Social contract</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Velzen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ofe, Hosea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kaa, Geerten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Reuver, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Halmstad full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Halmstad</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Electronic markets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbas, Antragama Ewa</au><au>van Velzen, Thomas</au><au>Ofe, Hosea</au><au>van de Kaa, Geerten</au><au>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</au><au>de Reuver, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective</atitle><jtitle>Electronic markets</jtitle><stitle>Electron Markets</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><pages>20-</pages><artnum>20</artnum><issn>1019-6781</issn><issn>1422-8890</issn><eissn>1422-8890</eissn><abstract>In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as
data ownership
. Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through
responsibility divisions
, steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as
control
,
security
, and
compliance mechanisms
, thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared,
privacy
becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-1714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1019-6781 |
ispartof | Electronic markets, 2024-12, Vol.34 (1), p.20, Article 20 |
issn | 1019-6781 1422-8890 1422-8890 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hh_52955 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Springer Link |
subjects | Business and Management Compliance Concept formation Contract theory Data economy Data marketplaces Data sharing Data sovereignty e-Commerce/e-business Enforcement Frame analysis Information sharing IT in Business L86 Meta-platforms Ownership Privacy Research Paper Social contract Sovereignty |
title | Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20control%20over%20data:%20Conceptualizing%20data%20sovereignty%20from%20a%20social%20contract%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20markets&rft.au=Abbas,%20Antragama%20Ewa&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.pages=20-&rft.artnum=20&rft.issn=1019-6781&rft.eissn=1422-8890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12525-024-00695-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2933844832%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e687134fee17ab52f8d8de79257710e09f1ed302ec7bad36d35b34c1363512c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933844832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |