Loading…
Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?
Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 25...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain and cognition 2010-10, Vol.74 (1), p.24-34 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93 |
container_end_page | 34 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Brain and cognition |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Intaitė, Monika Koivisto, Mika Rukšėnas, Osvaldas Revonsuo, Antti |
description | Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250
ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_his_4693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ892474</ericid><els_id>S0278262610000734</els_id><sourcerecordid>EJ892474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOGzEQhi1EVULaJyhCvvQEm469jnddqaoiSlsQUiVUerVmvbPB0WYX2SaIt69p0hw52fJ8_8z4Y-yDgJkAoT-tZg0OrZtJyC-gZwDygE0EGCikUNUhm4Cs6kJqqY_YcYwrADBKyrfsSMLc1EqYCbu9pQ2FiD0faInJb3x65rktb3xM2PTEY_Lrx95_5ouUaEh-HM45PmGggWI852PgcVxTuvfDklMf6es79qbDfHm_O6fs7vvl74ufxc2vH1cXi5vCKVGmQsuyNNQYlOiqGrq51o1o6xY6kKbTQjg1bwkbXWtRV-jE3FVV_pfJMcTOlFN2tu0bn-jhsbEPwa8xPNsRvf3m_yzsGJb23kerdM5MWbmlXRhjDNTteQH2xadd2X8-7YtPC9pmnzl1uk3lAWtq95n_AjPwcQdgdNh3AQeXR-65UtSgADJ3suUoeLcvX17XRqpK5fKXXTkL23gKNjpPg6PWB3LJtqN_dc-_5_-dyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Intaitė, Monika ; Koivisto, Mika ; Rukšėnas, Osvaldas ; Revonsuo, Antti</creator><creatorcontrib>Intaitė, Monika ; Koivisto, Mika ; Rukšėnas, Osvaldas ; Revonsuo, Antti</creatorcontrib><description>Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250
ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20598419</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCOEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambiguous figures ; Attention - physiology ; Awareness - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Cognitive Processes ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Diagnostic Tests ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Event-related potentials ; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; N2pc ; Natural sciences ; Naturvetenskap ; Necker cube ; Optical Illusions - physiology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reversal negativity ; Vision ; Visual Perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 2010-10, Vol.74 (1), p.24-34</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ892474$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23180400$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20598419$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-4693$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Intaitė, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revonsuo, Antti</creatorcontrib><title>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250
ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambiguous figures</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Awareness - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>N2pc</subject><subject>Natural sciences</subject><subject>Naturvetenskap</subject><subject>Necker cube</subject><subject>Optical Illusions - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reversal negativity</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOGzEQhi1EVULaJyhCvvQEm469jnddqaoiSlsQUiVUerVmvbPB0WYX2SaIt69p0hw52fJ8_8z4Y-yDgJkAoT-tZg0OrZtJyC-gZwDygE0EGCikUNUhm4Cs6kJqqY_YcYwrADBKyrfsSMLc1EqYCbu9pQ2FiD0faInJb3x65rktb3xM2PTEY_Lrx95_5ouUaEh-HM45PmGggWI852PgcVxTuvfDklMf6es79qbDfHm_O6fs7vvl74ufxc2vH1cXi5vCKVGmQsuyNNQYlOiqGrq51o1o6xY6kKbTQjg1bwkbXWtRV-jE3FVV_pfJMcTOlFN2tu0bn-jhsbEPwa8xPNsRvf3m_yzsGJb23kerdM5MWbmlXRhjDNTteQH2xadd2X8-7YtPC9pmnzl1uk3lAWtq95n_AjPwcQdgdNh3AQeXR-65UtSgADJ3suUoeLcvX17XRqpK5fKXXTkL23gKNjpPg6PWB3LJtqN_dc-_5_-dyA</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Intaitė, Monika</creator><creator>Koivisto, Mika</creator><creator>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</creator><creator>Revonsuo, Antti</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</title><author>Intaitė, Monika ; Koivisto, Mika ; Rukšėnas, Osvaldas ; Revonsuo, Antti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambiguous figures</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Awareness - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>N2pc</topic><topic>Natural sciences</topic><topic>Naturvetenskap</topic><topic>Necker cube</topic><topic>Optical Illusions - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reversal negativity</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Intaitė, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revonsuo, Antti</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Skövde</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Intaitė, Monika</au><au>Koivisto, Mika</au><au>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</au><au>Revonsuo, Antti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ892474</ericid><atitle>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>24-34</pages><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><coden>BRCOEI</coden><abstract>Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250
ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20598419</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2626 |
ispartof | Brain and cognition, 2010-10, Vol.74 (1), p.24-34 |
issn | 0278-2626 1090-2147 1090-2147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_his_4693 |
source | Elsevier; ERIC |
subjects | Adult Ambiguous figures Attention - physiology Awareness - physiology Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Cerebral Cortex - physiology Cognitive Processes Comparative Analysis Correlation Diagnostic Tests Electroencephalography Electrophysiology Event-related potentials Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male N2pc Natural sciences Naturvetenskap Necker cube Optical Illusions - physiology Perception Photic Stimulation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology Reversal negativity Vision Visual Perception Visual Perception - physiology Visual Stimuli |
title | Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reversal%20negativity%20and%20bistable%20stimuli:%20Attention,%20awareness,%20or%20something%20else?&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Intait%C4%97,%20Monika&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=24-34&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft.coden=BRCOEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002&rft_dat=%3Ceric_swepu%3EEJ892474%3C/eric_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/20598419&rft_ericid=EJ892474&rfr_iscdi=true |