Loading…

Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?

Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 25...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and cognition 2010-10, Vol.74 (1), p.24-34
Main Authors: Intaitė, Monika, Koivisto, Mika, Rukšėnas, Osvaldas, Revonsuo, Antti
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Brain and cognition
container_volume 74
creator Intaitė, Monika
Koivisto, Mika
Rukšėnas, Osvaldas
Revonsuo, Antti
description Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250 ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_his_4693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ892474</ericid><els_id>S0278262610000734</els_id><sourcerecordid>EJ892474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOGzEQhi1EVULaJyhCvvQEm469jnddqaoiSlsQUiVUerVmvbPB0WYX2SaIt69p0hw52fJ8_8z4Y-yDgJkAoT-tZg0OrZtJyC-gZwDygE0EGCikUNUhm4Cs6kJqqY_YcYwrADBKyrfsSMLc1EqYCbu9pQ2FiD0faInJb3x65rktb3xM2PTEY_Lrx95_5ouUaEh-HM45PmGggWI852PgcVxTuvfDklMf6es79qbDfHm_O6fs7vvl74ufxc2vH1cXi5vCKVGmQsuyNNQYlOiqGrq51o1o6xY6kKbTQjg1bwkbXWtRV-jE3FVV_pfJMcTOlFN2tu0bn-jhsbEPwa8xPNsRvf3m_yzsGJb23kerdM5MWbmlXRhjDNTteQH2xadd2X8-7YtPC9pmnzl1uk3lAWtq95n_AjPwcQdgdNh3AQeXR-65UtSgADJ3suUoeLcvX17XRqpK5fKXXTkL23gKNjpPg6PWB3LJtqN_dc-_5_-dyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Intaitė, Monika ; Koivisto, Mika ; Rukšėnas, Osvaldas ; Revonsuo, Antti</creator><creatorcontrib>Intaitė, Monika ; Koivisto, Mika ; Rukšėnas, Osvaldas ; Revonsuo, Antti</creatorcontrib><description>Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250 ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20598419</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCOEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambiguous figures ; Attention - physiology ; Awareness - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Cognitive Processes ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Diagnostic Tests ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Event-related potentials ; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; N2pc ; Natural sciences ; Naturvetenskap ; Necker cube ; Optical Illusions - physiology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reversal negativity ; Vision ; Visual Perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 2010-10, Vol.74 (1), p.24-34</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ892474$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23180400$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20598419$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-4693$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Intaitė, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revonsuo, Antti</creatorcontrib><title>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250 ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambiguous figures</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Awareness - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>N2pc</subject><subject>Natural sciences</subject><subject>Naturvetenskap</subject><subject>Necker cube</subject><subject>Optical Illusions - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reversal negativity</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOGzEQhi1EVULaJyhCvvQEm469jnddqaoiSlsQUiVUerVmvbPB0WYX2SaIt69p0hw52fJ8_8z4Y-yDgJkAoT-tZg0OrZtJyC-gZwDygE0EGCikUNUhm4Cs6kJqqY_YcYwrADBKyrfsSMLc1EqYCbu9pQ2FiD0faInJb3x65rktb3xM2PTEY_Lrx95_5ouUaEh-HM45PmGggWI852PgcVxTuvfDklMf6es79qbDfHm_O6fs7vvl74ufxc2vH1cXi5vCKVGmQsuyNNQYlOiqGrq51o1o6xY6kKbTQjg1bwkbXWtRV-jE3FVV_pfJMcTOlFN2tu0bn-jhsbEPwa8xPNsRvf3m_yzsGJb23kerdM5MWbmlXRhjDNTteQH2xadd2X8-7YtPC9pmnzl1uk3lAWtq95n_AjPwcQdgdNh3AQeXR-65UtSgADJ3suUoeLcvX17XRqpK5fKXXTkL23gKNjpPg6PWB3LJtqN_dc-_5_-dyA</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Intaitė, Monika</creator><creator>Koivisto, Mika</creator><creator>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</creator><creator>Revonsuo, Antti</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</title><author>Intaitė, Monika ; Koivisto, Mika ; Rukšėnas, Osvaldas ; Revonsuo, Antti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambiguous figures</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Awareness - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>N2pc</topic><topic>Natural sciences</topic><topic>Naturvetenskap</topic><topic>Necker cube</topic><topic>Optical Illusions - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reversal negativity</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Intaitė, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revonsuo, Antti</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Skövde</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Intaitė, Monika</au><au>Koivisto, Mika</au><au>Rukšėnas, Osvaldas</au><au>Revonsuo, Antti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ892474</ericid><atitle>Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>24-34</pages><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><coden>BRCOEI</coden><abstract>Ambiguous (or bistable) figures are visual stimuli that have two mutually exclusive perceptual interpretations that spontaneously alternate with each other. Perceptual reversals, as compared with non-reversals, typically elicit a negative difference called reversal negativity (RN), peaking around 250 ms from stimulus onset. The cognitive interpretation of RN remains unclear: it may reflect either bottom-up processes, attentional processes that select between the alternative views of the stimulus, or it may reflect the change in the contents of subjective awareness. In the present study, event-related potentials in response to endogenous unilateral and bilateral reversals of two Necker lattices were compared with exogenously induced reversals of unambiguous lattices. The RN neither resembled the attention-related N2pc response, nor did it correlate with the content of subjective visual awareness. Thus, we conclude that RN is a non-attentional ERP correlate of the changes in the perceptual configuration of the presented object.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20598419</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2626
ispartof Brain and cognition, 2010-10, Vol.74 (1), p.24-34
issn 0278-2626
1090-2147
1090-2147
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_his_4693
source Elsevier; ERIC
subjects Adult
Ambiguous figures
Attention - physiology
Awareness - physiology
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Cognitive Processes
Comparative Analysis
Correlation
Diagnostic Tests
Electroencephalography
Electrophysiology
Event-related potentials
Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
N2pc
Natural sciences
Naturvetenskap
Necker cube
Optical Illusions - physiology
Perception
Photic Stimulation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Reversal negativity
Vision
Visual Perception
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual Stimuli
title Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reversal%20negativity%20and%20bistable%20stimuli:%20Attention,%20awareness,%20or%20something%20else?&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Intait%C4%97,%20Monika&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=24-34&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft.coden=BRCOEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002&rft_dat=%3Ceric_swepu%3EEJ892474%3C/eric_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-62339eb9a2ac780f566b1d8d0f029f611c45deab686187ac15c771479339aaf93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/20598419&rft_ericid=EJ892474&rfr_iscdi=true