Loading…

Geographic Diversification and the Survival of Born-Globals

The staged internationalization model posits that firms internationalize incrementally over time. However, born-globals are less likely to follow a more gradual model of staged internationalization, and they must decide on the scope of internationalization at their founding to exploit entrepreneuria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of management 2018-05, Vol.44 (5), p.2008-2036
Main Authors: Patel, Pankaj C., Criaco, Giuseppe, Naldi, Lucia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-57bf38fb0847f0d1367366fd2f2a35f5f749f165ad1a6c648bf008ca767ca18b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-57bf38fb0847f0d1367366fd2f2a35f5f749f165ad1a6c648bf008ca767ca18b3
container_end_page 2036
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2008
container_title Journal of management
container_volume 44
creator Patel, Pankaj C.
Criaco, Giuseppe
Naldi, Lucia
description The staged internationalization model posits that firms internationalize incrementally over time. However, born-globals are less likely to follow a more gradual model of staged internationalization, and they must decide on the scope of internationalization at their founding to exploit entrepreneurial opportunities on a global scale. Because returns from international expansion must be considered along with the risk of failure, we propose that born-globals’ local industry conditions moderate the relationship between the scope of intraregional diversification (geographic diversification within a region) or interregional diversification (geographic diversification across different regions) and survival. Using a sample of 680 Swedish born-globals founded in 2002, 2003, or 2004 and followed until 2010; data from Swedish Customs; and archival performance data, we find that interregional geographic diversification increases—and that intraregional diversification decreases—the likelihood of failure, which declines further when born-globals undertake intraregional geographic diversification under higher environmental dynamism in the home country industry. Conversely, undertaking interregional geographic diversification even when the home country industry is munificent increases the likelihood of failure (marginally significant). The findings are robust to several alternative specifications.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0149206316635251
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hj_29792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0149206316635251</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2024258811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-57bf38fb0847f0d1367366fd2f2a35f5f749f165ad1a6c648bf008ca767ca18b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd3jwWPUs03aX4UT3PTKgw8-OMa0jbZMmZTk3bif2_HhoLg6R3e5z0eD6FzwFcAQlxjyHKCOQXOKSMMDtAIGBMpEIBDNNra6dY_RicxrjDGIHE2QjeF8Yug26WrkpnbmBCddZXunG8S3dRJtzTJcx82bqPXibfJrQ9NWqx9qdfxFB3ZQczZXsfo9f7uZfqQzp-Kx-lknlaZZF3KRGmptCWWmbC4BsoF5dzWxBJNmWVWZLkFznQNmlc8k6XFWFZacFFpkCUdo8tdb_w0bV-qNrh3Hb6U107N3NtE-bBQy5UiucjJQF_s6Db4j97ETq18H5phoCKYZIRJCTBQeEdVwccYjP1pBay2h6q_hw6RdD9DL8xv6b_8N2Q8c6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024258811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geographic Diversification and the Survival of Born-Globals</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Patel, Pankaj C. ; Criaco, Giuseppe ; Naldi, Lucia</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pankaj C. ; Criaco, Giuseppe ; Naldi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><description>The staged internationalization model posits that firms internationalize incrementally over time. However, born-globals are less likely to follow a more gradual model of staged internationalization, and they must decide on the scope of internationalization at their founding to exploit entrepreneurial opportunities on a global scale. Because returns from international expansion must be considered along with the risk of failure, we propose that born-globals’ local industry conditions moderate the relationship between the scope of intraregional diversification (geographic diversification within a region) or interregional diversification (geographic diversification across different regions) and survival. Using a sample of 680 Swedish born-globals founded in 2002, 2003, or 2004 and followed until 2010; data from Swedish Customs; and archival performance data, we find that interregional geographic diversification increases—and that intraregional diversification decreases—the likelihood of failure, which declines further when born-globals undertake intraregional geographic diversification under higher environmental dynamism in the home country industry. Conversely, undertaking interregional geographic diversification even when the home country industry is munificent increases the likelihood of failure (marginally significant). The findings are robust to several alternative specifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2063</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-1211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-1211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0149206316635251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Diversification ; Equity ; Founding ; Globalization</subject><ispartof>Journal of management, 2018-05, Vol.44 (5), p.2008-2036</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-57bf38fb0847f0d1367366fd2f2a35f5f749f165ad1a6c648bf008ca767ca18b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-57bf38fb0847f0d1367366fd2f2a35f5f749f165ad1a6c648bf008ca767ca18b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,33223,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-29792$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pankaj C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Criaco, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><title>Geographic Diversification and the Survival of Born-Globals</title><title>Journal of management</title><description>The staged internationalization model posits that firms internationalize incrementally over time. However, born-globals are less likely to follow a more gradual model of staged internationalization, and they must decide on the scope of internationalization at their founding to exploit entrepreneurial opportunities on a global scale. Because returns from international expansion must be considered along with the risk of failure, we propose that born-globals’ local industry conditions moderate the relationship between the scope of intraregional diversification (geographic diversification within a region) or interregional diversification (geographic diversification across different regions) and survival. Using a sample of 680 Swedish born-globals founded in 2002, 2003, or 2004 and followed until 2010; data from Swedish Customs; and archival performance data, we find that interregional geographic diversification increases—and that intraregional diversification decreases—the likelihood of failure, which declines further when born-globals undertake intraregional geographic diversification under higher environmental dynamism in the home country industry. Conversely, undertaking interregional geographic diversification even when the home country industry is munificent increases the likelihood of failure (marginally significant). The findings are robust to several alternative specifications.</description><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Founding</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><issn>0149-2063</issn><issn>1557-1211</issn><issn>1557-1211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd3jwWPUs03aX4UT3PTKgw8-OMa0jbZMmZTk3bif2_HhoLg6R3e5z0eD6FzwFcAQlxjyHKCOQXOKSMMDtAIGBMpEIBDNNra6dY_RicxrjDGIHE2QjeF8Yug26WrkpnbmBCddZXunG8S3dRJtzTJcx82bqPXibfJrQ9NWqx9qdfxFB3ZQczZXsfo9f7uZfqQzp-Kx-lknlaZZF3KRGmptCWWmbC4BsoF5dzWxBJNmWVWZLkFznQNmlc8k6XFWFZacFFpkCUdo8tdb_w0bV-qNrh3Hb6U107N3NtE-bBQy5UiucjJQF_s6Db4j97ETq18H5phoCKYZIRJCTBQeEdVwccYjP1pBay2h6q_hw6RdD9DL8xv6b_8N2Q8c6w</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Patel, Pankaj C.</creator><creator>Criaco, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Naldi, Lucia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>AABRY</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D8X</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Geographic Diversification and the Survival of Born-Globals</title><author>Patel, Pankaj C. ; Criaco, Giuseppe ; Naldi, Lucia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-57bf38fb0847f0d1367366fd2f2a35f5f749f165ad1a6c648bf008ca767ca18b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Founding</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pankaj C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Criaco, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Jönköping full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Högskolan i Jönköping</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, Pankaj C.</au><au>Criaco, Giuseppe</au><au>Naldi, Lucia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geographic Diversification and the Survival of Born-Globals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2008</spage><epage>2036</epage><pages>2008-2036</pages><issn>0149-2063</issn><issn>1557-1211</issn><eissn>1557-1211</eissn><abstract>The staged internationalization model posits that firms internationalize incrementally over time. However, born-globals are less likely to follow a more gradual model of staged internationalization, and they must decide on the scope of internationalization at their founding to exploit entrepreneurial opportunities on a global scale. Because returns from international expansion must be considered along with the risk of failure, we propose that born-globals’ local industry conditions moderate the relationship between the scope of intraregional diversification (geographic diversification within a region) or interregional diversification (geographic diversification across different regions) and survival. Using a sample of 680 Swedish born-globals founded in 2002, 2003, or 2004 and followed until 2010; data from Swedish Customs; and archival performance data, we find that interregional geographic diversification increases—and that intraregional diversification decreases—the likelihood of failure, which declines further when born-globals undertake intraregional geographic diversification under higher environmental dynamism in the home country industry. Conversely, undertaking interregional geographic diversification even when the home country industry is munificent increases the likelihood of failure (marginally significant). The findings are robust to several alternative specifications.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0149206316635251</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2063
ispartof Journal of management, 2018-05, Vol.44 (5), p.2008-2036
issn 0149-2063
1557-1211
1557-1211
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hj_29792
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Sage Journals Online
subjects Diversification
Equity
Founding
Globalization
title Geographic Diversification and the Survival of Born-Globals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geographic%20Diversification%20and%20the%20Survival%20of%20Born-Globals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Patel,%20Pankaj%20C.&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2008&rft.epage=2036&rft.pages=2008-2036&rft.issn=0149-2063&rft.eissn=1557-1211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0149206316635251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2024258811%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-57bf38fb0847f0d1367366fd2f2a35f5f749f165ad1a6c648bf008ca767ca18b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024258811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0149206316635251&rfr_iscdi=true