Loading…
Evidence of quasiequilibrium in pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers
Two sets of measurements utilizing hot-wire anemometry and oil-film interferometry for flat-plate turbulent boundary layers, exposed to various controlled adverse and favourable pressure gradients, are used to evaluate history effects of the imposed and varying free-stream gradients. The results are...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of fluid mechanics 2024-05, Vol.987, Article R8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Two sets of measurements utilizing hot-wire anemometry and oil-film interferometry for flat-plate turbulent boundary layers, exposed to various controlled adverse and favourable pressure gradients, are used to evaluate history effects of the imposed and varying free-stream gradients. The results are from the NDF wind tunnel at Illinois Tech (IIT) and the MTL wind tunnel at KTH, over the range $800 < Re_\tau < 22\,000$ (where $Re_{\tau }$ is the friction Reynolds number). The streamwise pressure-gradient parameter $\beta \equiv (-\ell /\tau _{w}) \cdot (\partial P_{e}/\partial x)$ varied between $-2 < \beta < 7$, where $\ell$ is an outer length scale for boundary layers equivalent to the half-height of channel flow and the radius of pipe flow, and is estimated for each boundary-layer profile; note that $\tau_w$ is the wall-shear stress and $P_e$ is the free-stream static pressure. Extracting from each profile the three parameters of the overlap region, following the recent work of Monkewitz & Nagib (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 967, 2023, p. A15) that led to an overlap region of combined logarithmic and linear parts, we find minimum history effects in the overlap region. Thus, the overlap region in this range of pressure-gradient boundary layers appears to be in ‘quasiequilibrium’. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1120 1469-7645 1469-7645 |
DOI: | 10.1017/jfm.2024.440 |