Loading…

Ground-based remote sensing of CH4 and N2O fluxes from a wastewater treatment plant and nearby biogas production with discoveries of unexpected sources

This study is an attempt to assess CH4 and N2O emissions from all the treatment steps of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Sweden, serving 145 000 persons, and an adjacent biogas production facility. We have used novel mid-IR ground-based remote sensing with a hyperspectral camera to visualize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental research 2022-03, Vol.204, p.111978-111978, Article 111978
Main Authors: Gålfalk, Magnus, Påledal, Sören Nilsson, Sehlén, Robert, Bastviken, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-36456438299af90148d205ead856f9fa68b56842c7b2ceb39d3dba23dce5afc23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-36456438299af90148d205ead856f9fa68b56842c7b2ceb39d3dba23dce5afc23
container_end_page 111978
container_issue
container_start_page 111978
container_title Environmental research
container_volume 204
creator Gålfalk, Magnus
Påledal, Sören Nilsson
Sehlén, Robert
Bastviken, David
description This study is an attempt to assess CH4 and N2O emissions from all the treatment steps of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Sweden, serving 145 000 persons, and an adjacent biogas production facility. We have used novel mid-IR ground-based remote sensing with a hyperspectral camera to visualize and quantify the emissions on 21 days during a year, with resulting yearly fluxes of 90.4 ± 4.3 tonne CH4/yr and 10.9 ± 1.3 tonne N2O/yr for the entire plant. The most highly emitting CH4 source was found to be sludge storage, which is seldom included in literature as in-situ methods are not suitable for measuring emissions extended over large surfaces, still contributing 90 % to the total CH4 emission in our case. The dominating N2O source was found to be a Stable High rate Ammonia Removal Over Nitrite reactor, contributing 89 % to the total N2O emissions. We also discovered several unexpected CH4 sources. Incomplete flaring of CH4 gave fluxes of at least 30 kg CH4/min, corresponding to plume concentrations of 2.5 %. Such highly episodic fluxes could double the plant-wide yearly emissions if they occur 2 days per year. From a distance of 250 m we found a leak in the biogas production facility, corresponding to 1.1 % of the CH4 produced, and that loading of organic material onto trucks from a biofertilizer storage tank contributed with high emissions during loading events. These results indicate that WWTP emissions globally may have been grossly underestimated and that it is essential to have effective methods that can measure all types of fluxes, and discover new potential sources, in order to make adequate priorities and to take effective actions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from WWTPs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111978
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_180505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013935121012731</els_id><sourcerecordid>2569378233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-36456438299af90148d205ead856f9fa68b56842c7b2ceb39d3dba23dce5afc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQjRBILIV_wMFHLln8EWfjC1K1QItUtRfgajn2ZPEqsYPH2W1_CX8Xr4I49jKjkd57M29eVb1ndMsoaz8etxBOCXDLKWdbxpjadS-qDaOqramS4mW1oZSJWgnJXldvEI9lZFLQTfXnJsUluLo3CI4kmGIGghDQhwOJA9nfNsQER-75AxnG5RGQDClOxJCzwQxnkyGRnMDkCUIm82hKvRACmNQ_kd7Hg0Eyp-gWm30M5OzzL-I82niC5Ite2bIEeJzB5nICxiVZwLfVq8GMCO_-9avqx9cv3_e39d3Dzbf99V1tGy5yLdpGto3ouFJmUJQ1neNUgnGdbAc1mLbrZds13O56bqEXygnXGy6cBWkGy8VVVa-6eIZ56fWc_GTSk47G68_-57WO6aBHv2jWUUllwX9Y8cXR7wUw66lYgbH4hrig5rJVYtdxIQq0WaE2RcQEw39xRvUlN33Ua276kptecyu0TysNiu2Th6TReggWnE_lRdpF_7zAXyUPplw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2569378233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ground-based remote sensing of CH4 and N2O fluxes from a wastewater treatment plant and nearby biogas production with discoveries of unexpected sources</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gålfalk, Magnus ; Påledal, Sören Nilsson ; Sehlén, Robert ; Bastviken, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Gålfalk, Magnus ; Påledal, Sören Nilsson ; Sehlén, Robert ; Bastviken, David</creatorcontrib><description>This study is an attempt to assess CH4 and N2O emissions from all the treatment steps of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Sweden, serving 145 000 persons, and an adjacent biogas production facility. We have used novel mid-IR ground-based remote sensing with a hyperspectral camera to visualize and quantify the emissions on 21 days during a year, with resulting yearly fluxes of 90.4 ± 4.3 tonne CH4/yr and 10.9 ± 1.3 tonne N2O/yr for the entire plant. The most highly emitting CH4 source was found to be sludge storage, which is seldom included in literature as in-situ methods are not suitable for measuring emissions extended over large surfaces, still contributing 90 % to the total CH4 emission in our case. The dominating N2O source was found to be a Stable High rate Ammonia Removal Over Nitrite reactor, contributing 89 % to the total N2O emissions. We also discovered several unexpected CH4 sources. Incomplete flaring of CH4 gave fluxes of at least 30 kg CH4/min, corresponding to plume concentrations of 2.5 %. Such highly episodic fluxes could double the plant-wide yearly emissions if they occur 2 days per year. From a distance of 250 m we found a leak in the biogas production facility, corresponding to 1.1 % of the CH4 produced, and that loading of organic material onto trucks from a biofertilizer storage tank contributed with high emissions during loading events. These results indicate that WWTP emissions globally may have been grossly underestimated and that it is essential to have effective methods that can measure all types of fluxes, and discover new potential sources, in order to make adequate priorities and to take effective actions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from WWTPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9351</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-0953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biogas production ; Hyperspectral imaging ; Methane ; Nitrous oxide ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Environmental research, 2022-03, Vol.204, p.111978-111978, Article 111978</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-36456438299af90148d205ead856f9fa68b56842c7b2ceb39d3dba23dce5afc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-36456438299af90148d205ead856f9fa68b56842c7b2ceb39d3dba23dce5afc23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0038-2152 ; 0000-0003-1453-2553 ; 0000-0003-1107-3929</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-180505$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gålfalk, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Påledal, Sören Nilsson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehlén, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastviken, David</creatorcontrib><title>Ground-based remote sensing of CH4 and N2O fluxes from a wastewater treatment plant and nearby biogas production with discoveries of unexpected sources</title><title>Environmental research</title><description>This study is an attempt to assess CH4 and N2O emissions from all the treatment steps of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Sweden, serving 145 000 persons, and an adjacent biogas production facility. We have used novel mid-IR ground-based remote sensing with a hyperspectral camera to visualize and quantify the emissions on 21 days during a year, with resulting yearly fluxes of 90.4 ± 4.3 tonne CH4/yr and 10.9 ± 1.3 tonne N2O/yr for the entire plant. The most highly emitting CH4 source was found to be sludge storage, which is seldom included in literature as in-situ methods are not suitable for measuring emissions extended over large surfaces, still contributing 90 % to the total CH4 emission in our case. The dominating N2O source was found to be a Stable High rate Ammonia Removal Over Nitrite reactor, contributing 89 % to the total N2O emissions. We also discovered several unexpected CH4 sources. Incomplete flaring of CH4 gave fluxes of at least 30 kg CH4/min, corresponding to plume concentrations of 2.5 %. Such highly episodic fluxes could double the plant-wide yearly emissions if they occur 2 days per year. From a distance of 250 m we found a leak in the biogas production facility, corresponding to 1.1 % of the CH4 produced, and that loading of organic material onto trucks from a biofertilizer storage tank contributed with high emissions during loading events. These results indicate that WWTP emissions globally may have been grossly underestimated and that it is essential to have effective methods that can measure all types of fluxes, and discover new potential sources, in order to make adequate priorities and to take effective actions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from WWTPs.</description><subject>Biogas production</subject><subject>Hyperspectral imaging</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>0013-9351</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQjRBILIV_wMFHLln8EWfjC1K1QItUtRfgajn2ZPEqsYPH2W1_CX8Xr4I49jKjkd57M29eVb1ndMsoaz8etxBOCXDLKWdbxpjadS-qDaOqramS4mW1oZSJWgnJXldvEI9lZFLQTfXnJsUluLo3CI4kmGIGghDQhwOJA9nfNsQER-75AxnG5RGQDClOxJCzwQxnkyGRnMDkCUIm82hKvRACmNQ_kd7Hg0Eyp-gWm30M5OzzL-I82niC5Ite2bIEeJzB5nICxiVZwLfVq8GMCO_-9avqx9cv3_e39d3Dzbf99V1tGy5yLdpGto3ouFJmUJQ1neNUgnGdbAc1mLbrZds13O56bqEXygnXGy6cBWkGy8VVVa-6eIZ56fWc_GTSk47G68_-57WO6aBHv2jWUUllwX9Y8cXR7wUw66lYgbH4hrig5rJVYtdxIQq0WaE2RcQEw39xRvUlN33Ua276kptecyu0TysNiu2Th6TReggWnE_lRdpF_7zAXyUPplw</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Gålfalk, Magnus</creator><creator>Påledal, Sören Nilsson</creator><creator>Sehlén, Robert</creator><creator>Bastviken, David</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ABXSW</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG8</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-2152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-2553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-3929</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Ground-based remote sensing of CH4 and N2O fluxes from a wastewater treatment plant and nearby biogas production with discoveries of unexpected sources</title><author>Gålfalk, Magnus ; Påledal, Sören Nilsson ; Sehlén, Robert ; Bastviken, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-36456438299af90148d205ead856f9fa68b56842c7b2ceb39d3dba23dce5afc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biogas production</topic><topic>Hyperspectral imaging</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gålfalk, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Påledal, Sören Nilsson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehlén, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastviken, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gålfalk, Magnus</au><au>Påledal, Sören Nilsson</au><au>Sehlén, Robert</au><au>Bastviken, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ground-based remote sensing of CH4 and N2O fluxes from a wastewater treatment plant and nearby biogas production with discoveries of unexpected sources</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>204</volume><spage>111978</spage><epage>111978</epage><pages>111978-111978</pages><artnum>111978</artnum><issn>0013-9351</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><eissn>1096-0953</eissn><abstract>This study is an attempt to assess CH4 and N2O emissions from all the treatment steps of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Sweden, serving 145 000 persons, and an adjacent biogas production facility. We have used novel mid-IR ground-based remote sensing with a hyperspectral camera to visualize and quantify the emissions on 21 days during a year, with resulting yearly fluxes of 90.4 ± 4.3 tonne CH4/yr and 10.9 ± 1.3 tonne N2O/yr for the entire plant. The most highly emitting CH4 source was found to be sludge storage, which is seldom included in literature as in-situ methods are not suitable for measuring emissions extended over large surfaces, still contributing 90 % to the total CH4 emission in our case. The dominating N2O source was found to be a Stable High rate Ammonia Removal Over Nitrite reactor, contributing 89 % to the total N2O emissions. We also discovered several unexpected CH4 sources. Incomplete flaring of CH4 gave fluxes of at least 30 kg CH4/min, corresponding to plume concentrations of 2.5 %. Such highly episodic fluxes could double the plant-wide yearly emissions if they occur 2 days per year. From a distance of 250 m we found a leak in the biogas production facility, corresponding to 1.1 % of the CH4 produced, and that loading of organic material onto trucks from a biofertilizer storage tank contributed with high emissions during loading events. These results indicate that WWTP emissions globally may have been grossly underestimated and that it is essential to have effective methods that can measure all types of fluxes, and discover new potential sources, in order to make adequate priorities and to take effective actions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from WWTPs.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2021.111978</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-2152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-2553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-3929</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-9351
ispartof Environmental research, 2022-03, Vol.204, p.111978-111978, Article 111978
issn 0013-9351
1096-0953
1096-0953
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_180505
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Biogas production
Hyperspectral imaging
Methane
Nitrous oxide
Wastewater treatment
title Ground-based remote sensing of CH4 and N2O fluxes from a wastewater treatment plant and nearby biogas production with discoveries of unexpected sources
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A50%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ground-based%20remote%20sensing%20of%20CH4%20and%20N2O%20fluxes%20from%20a%20wastewater%20treatment%20plant%20and%20nearby%20biogas%20production%20with%20discoveries%20of%20unexpected%20sources&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research&rft.au=G%C3%A5lfalk,%20Magnus&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=111978&rft.epage=111978&rft.pages=111978-111978&rft.artnum=111978&rft.issn=0013-9351&rft.eissn=1096-0953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2569378233%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-36456438299af90148d205ead856f9fa68b56842c7b2ceb39d3dba23dce5afc23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2569378233&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true