Distal ulna fractures in adults—subcapitular, transverse fractures did not benefit from surgical treatment

• Published in: Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2023-01, Vol.143 (1), p.381-387
• Main Authors: Moloney, Maria, Farnebo, Simon, Adolfsson, Lars
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Bone Plates - adverse effects; Classification; Distal ulna; DRUJ; Female; Fracture; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; Fractures; Humans; Injuries; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Patients; PRWE; Questionnaires; Radiology; Radius Fractures - complications; Radius Fractures - diagnostic imaging; Radius Fractures - surgery; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Trauma; Trauma Surgery; Treatment Outcome; Ulna; Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging; Ulna Fractures - surgery; Wrist; Wrist Fractures
• ISSN: 1434-3916; 0936-8051; 1434-3916
• DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04336-1

Introduction Fractures of the distal ulna, excluding the styloid, are rare. The cause of injury is often a fall on an outstretched hand with an extended wrist, and in most cases there is a concomitant distal radius fracture. The aims of this retrospective study were to investigate the results of the current treatment of distal ulna fractures in adults, with or without a concomitant distal radius fracture, and if a recently presented fracture classification could predict outcome. Materials and methods Patients, 18 years or older, treated for a fracture of the distal third of ulna in our county, were included. Fractures of the styloid tip were excluded. The radiographs of the fractures were independently classified by two specialists in radiology according to the 2018 AO/OTA classification. Follow-up was performed 5–7 years after the injury, through the questionnaire Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and new radiographs of both wrists. Results Ninety-six patients with 97 fractures were included and filled out the PRWE. 65 patients also had new radiographs taken. 79 patients were women and the mean age at the time of injury was 63 years (SD 14.5). The most common fracture class was the extra-articular transverse fracture, 2U3A2.3 (42%). We found that 40% of the fractures had been treated by internal fixation and only 2 fractures had not healed, one conservatively treated and one operated. The median PRWE was 15 (IQR 33.5). The PRWE score was significantly worse in the operated ulna fractures ( p  = 0.01) and this was also true for extra-articular transverse fractures 2U3A2.3 ( p  = 0.001). Initial displacement was more common in operated transverse fractures, but it could not be proven that this was the reason for the inferior result. Conclusions Distal ulna fractures almost always unite and the result is comparable to that of isolated distal radius fractures when measured by PRWE. Based on the opinions of the radiologists and how often a consensus discussion was needed for classification, we found the updated AO classification system difficult to use, if dependent only on standard radiographic views. In the present study, transverse extra-articular ulna fractures did not benefit from internal fixation regardless if associated with a distal radius fracture or isolated.