Loading…
Ab initio supported development of TiN/MoN superlattice thin films with improved hardness and toughness
Motivated by density functional theory (DFT)-derived ductility indicators for face centered cubic (fcc, rocksalt) structured TiN/MoN0.5 superlattices and Ti0.5Mo0.5N0.75 solid solutions, TiN/MoNy superlattice (SL) thin films with bilayer periods Λ of 2.4, 3.9, 6.6, 9.9, and 23.0 nm and corresponding...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta materialia 2022-06, Vol.231, p.117871, Article 117871 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Motivated by density functional theory (DFT)-derived ductility indicators for face centered cubic (fcc, rocksalt) structured TiN/MoN0.5 superlattices and Ti0.5Mo0.5N0.75 solid solutions, TiN/MoNy superlattice (SL) thin films with bilayer periods Λ of 2.4, 3.9, 6.6, 9.9, and 23.0 nm and corresponding solid solutions were developed by DC reactive magnetron sputtering. These SLs allow for improved hardness H and critical fracture toughness KIC, with both peaking at the same bilayer period Λ of 9.9 nm (where the MoN0.5 layers crystallize with the ordered β-Mo2N phase); H = 34.8 ± 1.6 GPa and KIC = 4.1 ± 0.2 MPa√m. The correspondingly prepared fcc-Ti0.5Mo0.5N0.77 solid solution has H = 31.4 ± 1.5 GPa and KIC = 3.3 ± 0.2 MPa√m. Thus, especially the fracture toughness shows a significant superlattice effect. This is suggested by DFT—by the increase of the Cauchy pressure from −19 to +20 GPa for the 001-direction (while that in the 100-direction remained high, above 83 GPa) upon increasing Λ from 3 to 4 nm.
Together, experimental and computational investigations prove the importance of optimized bilayer periods for highest strength and fracture toughness, as well as optimized N-content for the solid solutions.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-6454 1873-2453 1873-2453 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117871 |