Loading…
Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage
In the process of upgrading biogas to biomethane for gas grid injection or use as a vehicle fuel, biogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) is separated and normally emitted to the atmosphere. Meanwhile, there are a number of ways of utilizing CO₂ to reduce the dependency on fossil carbon sources. This article...
Saved in:
Published in: | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 2024-03, Vol.192, p.114239, Article 114239 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1b316d4513704a6e06c65d14d35400112fb1bef3a04c98042b0f4a66c09a201b3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 114239 |
container_title | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews |
container_volume | 192 |
creator | Gustafsson, Marcus Cordova, Stephanie S. Svensson, Niclas Eklund, Mats |
description | In the process of upgrading biogas to biomethane for gas grid injection or use as a vehicle fuel, biogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) is separated and normally emitted to the atmosphere. Meanwhile, there are a number of ways of utilizing CO₂ to reduce the dependency on fossil carbon sources. This article assesses the climate performance of liquefied biomethane for road transport with different options for utilization or storage of CO₂. The analysis is done from a life cycle perspective, covering the required and avoided processes from biogas production to the end use of biomethane and CO₂. The results show that all of the studied options for CO₂ utilization can improve the climate performance of biomethane, in some cases contributing to negative CO₂ emissions. One of the best options, from a climate impact perspective, is to use the CO₂ internally to produce more methane, although continuous supply of hydrogen from renewable sources can be a challenge. Another option that stands out is concrete curing, where CO₂ can both replace conventional steam curing and be stored for a long time in mineral form. Storing CO₂ in geological formations can also lead to negative CO₂ emissions. However, with such long-term storage solutions, opportunities to recycle biogenic CO₂ are lost, together with the possibility of de-fossilizing processes that require carbon, such as chemical production and horticulture.
•Climate performance assessment of CO₂ utilization options for biomethane production.•Negative CO₂ emissions is attainable for four of the six CO₂ utilization pathways.•Methanation is a good option, given adequate access to renewable hydrogen.•Many CO₂ pathways improve climate performance and contribute to de-fossilization.•Utilization of CO₂ from biomethane can give lower climate impact than storage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114239 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_199808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364032123010973</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1364032123010973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1b316d4513704a6e06c65d14d35400112fb1bef3a04c98042b0f4a66c09a201b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRb0AifL4AVb-gQS_kjYSm6o8pUpsoFvLccbtVGldbIcCX4-rIpasRpq5ZzRzCLnmrOSM1zfrMkQIpWBClpwrIZsTMuKyVgWTgp-R8xjXjPFqMpYjspj1uDEJ6A6C82Fjthaod7TH9wEcQkdb9BtIK7MFuse0otaE1m9ph_4TO6BDwh6_TcLc84HG5INZwiU5daaPcPVbL8jbw_3r7KmYvzw-z6bzwkopU8FbyetOVVyOmTI1sNrWVcdVJyuVT-TCtbwFJw1TtpkwJVrmcq62rDGCZfqCFMe9cQ-7odW7kL8JX9ob1He4mGoflrrHQfMm85OcF8e8DT7GAO6P4Ewf7Om1PtjTB3v6aC9Dt0cI8icfmKfRImRRHQawSXce_8N_AJ6Pe5c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gustafsson, Marcus ; Cordova, Stephanie S. ; Svensson, Niclas ; Eklund, Mats</creator><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Marcus ; Cordova, Stephanie S. ; Svensson, Niclas ; Eklund, Mats</creatorcontrib><description>In the process of upgrading biogas to biomethane for gas grid injection or use as a vehicle fuel, biogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) is separated and normally emitted to the atmosphere. Meanwhile, there are a number of ways of utilizing CO₂ to reduce the dependency on fossil carbon sources. This article assesses the climate performance of liquefied biomethane for road transport with different options for utilization or storage of CO₂. The analysis is done from a life cycle perspective, covering the required and avoided processes from biogas production to the end use of biomethane and CO₂. The results show that all of the studied options for CO₂ utilization can improve the climate performance of biomethane, in some cases contributing to negative CO₂ emissions. One of the best options, from a climate impact perspective, is to use the CO₂ internally to produce more methane, although continuous supply of hydrogen from renewable sources can be a challenge. Another option that stands out is concrete curing, where CO₂ can both replace conventional steam curing and be stored for a long time in mineral form. Storing CO₂ in geological formations can also lead to negative CO₂ emissions. However, with such long-term storage solutions, opportunities to recycle biogenic CO₂ are lost, together with the possibility of de-fossilizing processes that require carbon, such as chemical production and horticulture.
•Climate performance assessment of CO₂ utilization options for biomethane production.•Negative CO₂ emissions is attainable for four of the six CO₂ utilization pathways.•Methanation is a good option, given adequate access to renewable hydrogen.•Many CO₂ pathways improve climate performance and contribute to de-fossilization.•Utilization of CO₂ from biomethane can give lower climate impact than storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-0321</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biogas upgrading ; Biomethane ; Climate performance ; CO₂ utilization ; Life cycle assessment</subject><ispartof>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2024-03, Vol.192, p.114239, Article 114239</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1b316d4513704a6e06c65d14d35400112fb1bef3a04c98042b0f4a66c09a201b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6722-3220</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-199808$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordova, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, Niclas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Mats</creatorcontrib><title>Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage</title><title>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</title><description>In the process of upgrading biogas to biomethane for gas grid injection or use as a vehicle fuel, biogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) is separated and normally emitted to the atmosphere. Meanwhile, there are a number of ways of utilizing CO₂ to reduce the dependency on fossil carbon sources. This article assesses the climate performance of liquefied biomethane for road transport with different options for utilization or storage of CO₂. The analysis is done from a life cycle perspective, covering the required and avoided processes from biogas production to the end use of biomethane and CO₂. The results show that all of the studied options for CO₂ utilization can improve the climate performance of biomethane, in some cases contributing to negative CO₂ emissions. One of the best options, from a climate impact perspective, is to use the CO₂ internally to produce more methane, although continuous supply of hydrogen from renewable sources can be a challenge. Another option that stands out is concrete curing, where CO₂ can both replace conventional steam curing and be stored for a long time in mineral form. Storing CO₂ in geological formations can also lead to negative CO₂ emissions. However, with such long-term storage solutions, opportunities to recycle biogenic CO₂ are lost, together with the possibility of de-fossilizing processes that require carbon, such as chemical production and horticulture.
•Climate performance assessment of CO₂ utilization options for biomethane production.•Negative CO₂ emissions is attainable for four of the six CO₂ utilization pathways.•Methanation is a good option, given adequate access to renewable hydrogen.•Many CO₂ pathways improve climate performance and contribute to de-fossilization.•Utilization of CO₂ from biomethane can give lower climate impact than storage.</description><subject>Biogas upgrading</subject><subject>Biomethane</subject><subject>Climate performance</subject><subject>CO₂ utilization</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRb0AifL4AVb-gQS_kjYSm6o8pUpsoFvLccbtVGldbIcCX4-rIpasRpq5ZzRzCLnmrOSM1zfrMkQIpWBClpwrIZsTMuKyVgWTgp-R8xjXjPFqMpYjspj1uDEJ6A6C82Fjthaod7TH9wEcQkdb9BtIK7MFuse0otaE1m9ph_4TO6BDwh6_TcLc84HG5INZwiU5daaPcPVbL8jbw_3r7KmYvzw-z6bzwkopU8FbyetOVVyOmTI1sNrWVcdVJyuVT-TCtbwFJw1TtpkwJVrmcq62rDGCZfqCFMe9cQ-7odW7kL8JX9ob1He4mGoflrrHQfMm85OcF8e8DT7GAO6P4Ewf7Om1PtjTB3v6aC9Dt0cI8icfmKfRImRRHQawSXce_8N_AJ6Pe5c</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Gustafsson, Marcus</creator><creator>Cordova, Stephanie S.</creator><creator>Svensson, Niclas</creator><creator>Eklund, Mats</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABXSW</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG8</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-3220</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage</title><author>Gustafsson, Marcus ; Cordova, Stephanie S. ; Svensson, Niclas ; Eklund, Mats</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1b316d4513704a6e06c65d14d35400112fb1bef3a04c98042b0f4a66c09a201b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biogas upgrading</topic><topic>Biomethane</topic><topic>Climate performance</topic><topic>CO₂ utilization</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordova, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, Niclas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Mats</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gustafsson, Marcus</au><au>Cordova, Stephanie S.</au><au>Svensson, Niclas</au><au>Eklund, Mats</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage</atitle><jtitle>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>192</volume><spage>114239</spage><pages>114239-</pages><artnum>114239</artnum><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><abstract>In the process of upgrading biogas to biomethane for gas grid injection or use as a vehicle fuel, biogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) is separated and normally emitted to the atmosphere. Meanwhile, there are a number of ways of utilizing CO₂ to reduce the dependency on fossil carbon sources. This article assesses the climate performance of liquefied biomethane for road transport with different options for utilization or storage of CO₂. The analysis is done from a life cycle perspective, covering the required and avoided processes from biogas production to the end use of biomethane and CO₂. The results show that all of the studied options for CO₂ utilization can improve the climate performance of biomethane, in some cases contributing to negative CO₂ emissions. One of the best options, from a climate impact perspective, is to use the CO₂ internally to produce more methane, although continuous supply of hydrogen from renewable sources can be a challenge. Another option that stands out is concrete curing, where CO₂ can both replace conventional steam curing and be stored for a long time in mineral form. Storing CO₂ in geological formations can also lead to negative CO₂ emissions. However, with such long-term storage solutions, opportunities to recycle biogenic CO₂ are lost, together with the possibility of de-fossilizing processes that require carbon, such as chemical production and horticulture.
•Climate performance assessment of CO₂ utilization options for biomethane production.•Negative CO₂ emissions is attainable for four of the six CO₂ utilization pathways.•Methanation is a good option, given adequate access to renewable hydrogen.•Many CO₂ pathways improve climate performance and contribute to de-fossilization.•Utilization of CO₂ from biomethane can give lower climate impact than storage.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rser.2023.114239</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-3220</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-0321 |
ispartof | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2024-03, Vol.192, p.114239, Article 114239 |
issn | 1364-0321 1879-0690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_199808 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Biogas upgrading Biomethane Climate performance CO₂ utilization Life cycle assessment |
title | Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A15%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Climate%20performance%20of%20liquefied%20biomethane%20with%20carbon%20dioxide%20utilization%20or%20storage&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20&%20sustainable%20energy%20reviews&rft.au=Gustafsson,%20Marcus&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=192&rft.spage=114239&rft.pages=114239-&rft.artnum=114239&rft.issn=1364-0321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114239&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_swepu%3ES1364032123010973%3C/elsevier_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1b316d4513704a6e06c65d14d35400112fb1bef3a04c98042b0f4a66c09a201b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |