Loading…

Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification

This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 2015-01, Vol.41, p.1351-1365
Main Authors: Mainali, Brijesh, Silveira, Semida
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3
container_end_page 1365
container_issue
container_start_page 1351
container_title Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
container_volume 41
creator Mainali, Brijesh
Silveira, Semida
description This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_lnu_78496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364032114007916</els_id><sourcerecordid>1647002392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSNEJUrbL9CTjxxIOnYcJ5a4VKX8kSpxablajjPZekntxeMU9tvj1SKO9DQjze-NZt6rqksODQeurrZNIkyNAC4b0A3w4VV1yode16A0vC59q2QNreBvqrdEWwDeDX17Wt0_kA8bZhmtlK0PdvSLz3vmw4S_WY7MEiERw4Bps2cZ3WOIS9x4JDbHxNKa7MJwQZeTn72z2cdwXp3MdiG8-FvPqodPt_c3X-q7b5-_3lzf1U5qmWuuoOcjtBrneYCutJKDBCFlNwrBxeEzQDEo2U-dVBKHWThnbT9MAtw0tmfV--Ne-oW7dTS75J9s2ptovfnov1-bmDZmCavpB6lVweuX8R_50XDJuewK_-7I71L8uSJl8-TJ4bLYgHElw5UC0FIUI19GZQ8gWi0KKo6oS5Eo4fzvDg7m8LLZmkOY5hCmAW1KmEX04SjCYuezL1NyHoPDyadivZmi_5_8D31LqE8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647002392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Mainali, Brijesh ; Silveira, Semida</creator><creatorcontrib>Mainali, Brijesh ; Silveira, Semida</creatorcontrib><description>This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-0321</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Assessments ; Composite indicators ; Costs ; Electrification ; Energy technology ; Energy technology sustainability index ; Indicators ; Maskinteknik ; Mechanical Engineering ; Performance indices ; Principal component analysis ; Rural ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews, 2015-01, Vol.41, p.1351-1365</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-141145$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-78496$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mainali, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Semida</creatorcontrib><title>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</title><title>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews</title><description>This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Composite indicators</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Electrification</subject><subject>Energy technology</subject><subject>Energy technology sustainability index</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Maskinteknik</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Principal component analysis</subject><subject>Rural</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSNEJUrbL9CTjxxIOnYcJ5a4VKX8kSpxablajjPZekntxeMU9tvj1SKO9DQjze-NZt6rqksODQeurrZNIkyNAC4b0A3w4VV1yode16A0vC59q2QNreBvqrdEWwDeDX17Wt0_kA8bZhmtlK0PdvSLz3vmw4S_WY7MEiERw4Bps2cZ3WOIS9x4JDbHxNKa7MJwQZeTn72z2cdwXp3MdiG8-FvPqodPt_c3X-q7b5-_3lzf1U5qmWuuoOcjtBrneYCutJKDBCFlNwrBxeEzQDEo2U-dVBKHWThnbT9MAtw0tmfV--Ne-oW7dTS75J9s2ptovfnov1-bmDZmCavpB6lVweuX8R_50XDJuewK_-7I71L8uSJl8-TJ4bLYgHElw5UC0FIUI19GZQ8gWi0KKo6oS5Eo4fzvDg7m8LLZmkOY5hCmAW1KmEX04SjCYuezL1NyHoPDyadivZmi_5_8D31LqE8</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Mainali, Brijesh</creator><creator>Silveira, Semida</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8V</scope><scope>D92</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</title><author>Mainali, Brijesh ; Silveira, Semida</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Composite indicators</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Electrification</topic><topic>Energy technology</topic><topic>Energy technology sustainability index</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Maskinteknik</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Principal component analysis</topic><topic>Rural</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mainali, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Semida</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linnéuniversitetet</collection><jtitle>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mainali, Brijesh</au><au>Silveira, Semida</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</atitle><jtitle>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>1351</spage><epage>1365</epage><pages>1351-1365</pages><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><eissn>1879-0690</eissn><abstract>This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-0321
ispartof Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2015-01, Vol.41, p.1351-1365
issn 1364-0321
1879-0690
1879-0690
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_lnu_78496
source Elsevier
subjects Alternative energy sources
Assessments
Composite indicators
Costs
Electrification
Energy technology
Energy technology sustainability index
Indicators
Maskinteknik
Mechanical Engineering
Performance indices
Principal component analysis
Rural
Sustainability
title Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A44%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20a%20sustainability%20index%20to%20assess%20energy%20technologies%20for%20rural%20electrification&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20&%20sustainable%20energy%20reviews&rft.au=Mainali,%20Brijesh&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=1351&rft.epage=1365&rft.pages=1351-1365&rft.issn=1364-0321&rft.eissn=1879-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1647002392%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647002392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true