Loading…
Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification
This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 2015-01, Vol.41, p.1351-1365 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3 |
container_end_page | 1365 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1351 |
container_title | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Mainali, Brijesh Silveira, Semida |
description | This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_lnu_78496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364032114007916</els_id><sourcerecordid>1647002392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSNEJUrbL9CTjxxIOnYcJ5a4VKX8kSpxablajjPZekntxeMU9tvj1SKO9DQjze-NZt6rqksODQeurrZNIkyNAC4b0A3w4VV1yode16A0vC59q2QNreBvqrdEWwDeDX17Wt0_kA8bZhmtlK0PdvSLz3vmw4S_WY7MEiERw4Bps2cZ3WOIS9x4JDbHxNKa7MJwQZeTn72z2cdwXp3MdiG8-FvPqodPt_c3X-q7b5-_3lzf1U5qmWuuoOcjtBrneYCutJKDBCFlNwrBxeEzQDEo2U-dVBKHWThnbT9MAtw0tmfV--Ne-oW7dTS75J9s2ptovfnov1-bmDZmCavpB6lVweuX8R_50XDJuewK_-7I71L8uSJl8-TJ4bLYgHElw5UC0FIUI19GZQ8gWi0KKo6oS5Eo4fzvDg7m8LLZmkOY5hCmAW1KmEX04SjCYuezL1NyHoPDyadivZmi_5_8D31LqE8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647002392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Mainali, Brijesh ; Silveira, Semida</creator><creatorcontrib>Mainali, Brijesh ; Silveira, Semida</creatorcontrib><description>This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-0321</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Assessments ; Composite indicators ; Costs ; Electrification ; Energy technology ; Energy technology sustainability index ; Indicators ; Maskinteknik ; Mechanical Engineering ; Performance indices ; Principal component analysis ; Rural ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2015-01, Vol.41, p.1351-1365</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-141145$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-78496$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mainali, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Semida</creatorcontrib><title>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</title><title>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</title><description>This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Composite indicators</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Electrification</subject><subject>Energy technology</subject><subject>Energy technology sustainability index</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Maskinteknik</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Principal component analysis</subject><subject>Rural</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSNEJUrbL9CTjxxIOnYcJ5a4VKX8kSpxablajjPZekntxeMU9tvj1SKO9DQjze-NZt6rqksODQeurrZNIkyNAC4b0A3w4VV1yode16A0vC59q2QNreBvqrdEWwDeDX17Wt0_kA8bZhmtlK0PdvSLz3vmw4S_WY7MEiERw4Bps2cZ3WOIS9x4JDbHxNKa7MJwQZeTn72z2cdwXp3MdiG8-FvPqodPt_c3X-q7b5-_3lzf1U5qmWuuoOcjtBrneYCutJKDBCFlNwrBxeEzQDEo2U-dVBKHWThnbT9MAtw0tmfV--Ne-oW7dTS75J9s2ptovfnov1-bmDZmCavpB6lVweuX8R_50XDJuewK_-7I71L8uSJl8-TJ4bLYgHElw5UC0FIUI19GZQ8gWi0KKo6oS5Eo4fzvDg7m8LLZmkOY5hCmAW1KmEX04SjCYuezL1NyHoPDyadivZmi_5_8D31LqE8</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Mainali, Brijesh</creator><creator>Silveira, Semida</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8V</scope><scope>D92</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</title><author>Mainali, Brijesh ; Silveira, Semida</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Composite indicators</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Electrification</topic><topic>Energy technology</topic><topic>Energy technology sustainability index</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Maskinteknik</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Principal component analysis</topic><topic>Rural</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mainali, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Semida</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linnéuniversitetet</collection><jtitle>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mainali, Brijesh</au><au>Silveira, Semida</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification</atitle><jtitle>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>1351</spage><epage>1365</epage><pages>1351-1365</pages><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><eissn>1879-0690</eissn><abstract>This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-0321 |
ispartof | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2015-01, Vol.41, p.1351-1365 |
issn | 1364-0321 1879-0690 1879-0690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_lnu_78496 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Assessments Composite indicators Costs Electrification Energy technology Energy technology sustainability index Indicators Maskinteknik Mechanical Engineering Performance indices Principal component analysis Rural Sustainability |
title | Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A44%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20a%20sustainability%20index%20to%20assess%20energy%20technologies%20for%20rural%20electrification&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20&%20sustainable%20energy%20reviews&rft.au=Mainali,%20Brijesh&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=1351&rft.epage=1365&rft.pages=1351-1365&rft.issn=1364-0321&rft.eissn=1879-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1647002392%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-16071b039eff8051b0410402445b221210160e28647d5464e8f2ccaa78d20cdb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647002392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |