An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions

Eight of the current sizing and design methods proposed for bioretention facilities were evaluated for rainfall runoff and snow storage volumes for a costal cold climate in Trondheim, Norway. The RECARGA bioretention infiltration model was used to compare the performance of the methods using 30 mont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water science and technology 2007-01, Vol.56 (10), p.73-81
Main Authors: Muthanna, T M, Viklander, M, Thorolfsson, S T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Climate
Cold
Cold Climate
Cold storage
Cold weather
Design
Design parameters
Duration
Evaluation
Infiltration
Methods
Models, Theoretical
Overflow
Ponding
Rain
Rainfall
Rainfall-runoff relationships
Retention basins
Runoff
Sizing
Snow
Snow storage
Storage conditions
Storage requirements
Urban Water Engineering
VA-teknik
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Water Movements
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-70bd31e421131947e354853858424825fc89f8af2b2d8fb0c4a27c99012600e23
cites
container_end_page 81
container_issue 10
container_start_page 73
container_title Water science and technology
container_volume 56
creator Muthanna, T M
Viklander, M
Thorolfsson, S T
description Eight of the current sizing and design methods proposed for bioretention facilities were evaluated for rainfall runoff and snow storage volumes for a costal cold climate in Trondheim, Norway. The RECARGA bioretention infiltration model was used to compare the performance of the methods using 30 months of observed data from a pilot scale bioretention box. The surface areas, total ponding time, number and duration of overflow events, and snow storage volumes were compared. It was found that even in a costal cold climate with several intermittent melt cycles die snow storage requirements were an important design parameter, and if more than 25% of the total snow volume should stored this became the deciding design parameter.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wst.2007.745
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_ltu_4973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69009235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-70bd31e421131947e354853858424825fc89f8af2b2d8fb0c4a27c99012600e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0s1vFCEYB2BiNHZbvXk2JCamiZ2Vl48Bjpv6UZMmXtQrYWaYLQ07jAPj2v71Mu7GJh70BIEHwvvyQ-gFkDWFun67T3lNCZFrycUjtAKt60pLRh-jFaGSVUApO0GnKd2SohgnT9EJKMKVlnqFwmbA7ocNs80-Djj22I5juPPDFrufPuVl0vg4ueyG3yL5-2Vt5_JN7BLOEbcxdLgNfmezS3jv8w1OQ9zjlONkt67sD51fzqZn6ElvQ3LPj-MZ-vrh_ZfLq-r688dPl5vrquVC5EqSpmPgOAVgoLl0THAlmBKKU66o6Fule2V72tBO9Q1puaWy1ZoArQlxlJ2hN4d7096Nc2PGqTxuujPRevPOf9uYOG1NyLPhpVFFvz7ocYrfZ5ey2fnUuhDs4OKcTK0J0ZSJ_0JKalBAocDzf0IglNeCAZBCX_1Fb-M8DaU7ppTOagCQS0EXB9VOMaXJ9X9KAmKWFJiSArOkwJQUFP7yeOnc7Fz3gI_fzn4BImmtZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943611172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Muthanna, T M ; Viklander, M ; Thorolfsson, S T</creator><creatorcontrib>Muthanna, T M ; Viklander, M ; Thorolfsson, S T</creatorcontrib><description>Eight of the current sizing and design methods proposed for bioretention facilities were evaluated for rainfall runoff and snow storage volumes for a costal cold climate in Trondheim, Norway. The RECARGA bioretention infiltration model was used to compare the performance of the methods using 30 months of observed data from a pilot scale bioretention box. The surface areas, total ponding time, number and duration of overflow events, and snow storage volumes were compared. It was found that even in a costal cold climate with several intermittent melt cycles die snow storage requirements were an important design parameter, and if more than 25% of the total snow volume should stored this became the deciding design parameter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.745</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18048979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Climate ; Cold ; Cold Climate ; Cold storage ; Cold weather ; Design ; Design parameters ; Duration ; Evaluation ; Infiltration ; Methods ; Models, Theoretical ; Overflow ; Ponding ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rainfall-runoff relationships ; Retention basins ; Runoff ; Sizing ; Snow ; Snow storage ; Storage conditions ; Storage requirements ; Urban Water Engineering ; VA-teknik ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Water Movements</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2007-01, Vol.56 (10), p.73-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Nov 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-70bd31e421131947e354853858424825fc89f8af2b2d8fb0c4a27c99012600e23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18048979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-4973$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muthanna, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viklander, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorolfsson, S T</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Eight of the current sizing and design methods proposed for bioretention facilities were evaluated for rainfall runoff and snow storage volumes for a costal cold climate in Trondheim, Norway. The RECARGA bioretention infiltration model was used to compare the performance of the methods using 30 months of observed data from a pilot scale bioretention box. The surface areas, total ponding time, number and duration of overflow events, and snow storage volumes were compared. It was found that even in a costal cold climate with several intermittent melt cycles die snow storage requirements were an important design parameter, and if more than 25% of the total snow volume should stored this became the deciding design parameter.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Cold Climate</subject><subject>Cold storage</subject><subject>Cold weather</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Duration</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Overflow</subject><subject>Ponding</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff relationships</subject><subject>Retention basins</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Sizing</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow storage</subject><subject>Storage conditions</subject><subject>Storage requirements</subject><subject>Urban Water Engineering</subject><subject>VA-teknik</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0s1vFCEYB2BiNHZbvXk2JCamiZ2Vl48Bjpv6UZMmXtQrYWaYLQ07jAPj2v71Mu7GJh70BIEHwvvyQ-gFkDWFun67T3lNCZFrycUjtAKt60pLRh-jFaGSVUApO0GnKd2SohgnT9EJKMKVlnqFwmbA7ocNs80-Djj22I5juPPDFrufPuVl0vg4ueyG3yL5-2Vt5_JN7BLOEbcxdLgNfmezS3jv8w1OQ9zjlONkt67sD51fzqZn6ElvQ3LPj-MZ-vrh_ZfLq-r688dPl5vrquVC5EqSpmPgOAVgoLl0THAlmBKKU66o6Fule2V72tBO9Q1puaWy1ZoArQlxlJ2hN4d7096Nc2PGqTxuujPRevPOf9uYOG1NyLPhpVFFvz7ocYrfZ5ey2fnUuhDs4OKcTK0J0ZSJ_0JKalBAocDzf0IglNeCAZBCX_1Fb-M8DaU7ppTOagCQS0EXB9VOMaXJ9X9KAmKWFJiSArOkwJQUFP7yeOnc7Fz3gI_fzn4BImmtZg</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Muthanna, T M</creator><creator>Viklander, M</creator><creator>Thorolfsson, S T</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions</title><author>Muthanna, T M ; Viklander, M ; Thorolfsson, S T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-70bd31e421131947e354853858424825fc89f8af2b2d8fb0c4a27c99012600e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Cold Climate</topic><topic>Cold storage</topic><topic>Cold weather</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Duration</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Overflow</topic><topic>Ponding</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff relationships</topic><topic>Retention basins</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Sizing</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow storage</topic><topic>Storage conditions</topic><topic>Storage requirements</topic><topic>Urban Water Engineering</topic><topic>VA-teknik</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muthanna, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viklander, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorolfsson, S T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muthanna, T M</au><au>Viklander, M</au><au>Thorolfsson, S T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>73-81</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>Eight of the current sizing and design methods proposed for bioretention facilities were evaluated for rainfall runoff and snow storage volumes for a costal cold climate in Trondheim, Norway. The RECARGA bioretention infiltration model was used to compare the performance of the methods using 30 months of observed data from a pilot scale bioretention box. The surface areas, total ponding time, number and duration of overflow events, and snow storage volumes were compared. It was found that even in a costal cold climate with several intermittent melt cycles die snow storage requirements were an important design parameter, and if more than 25% of the total snow volume should stored this became the deciding design parameter.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>18048979</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2007.745</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1223
ispartof Water science and technology, 2007-01, Vol.56 (10), p.73-81
issn 0273-1223
1996-9732
1996-9732
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_ltu_4973
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Climate
Cold
Cold Climate
Cold storage
Cold weather
Design
Design parameters
Duration
Evaluation
Infiltration
Methods
Models, Theoretical
Overflow
Ponding
Rain
Rainfall
Rainfall-runoff relationships
Retention basins
Runoff
Sizing
Snow
Snow storage
Storage conditions
Storage requirements
Urban Water Engineering
VA-teknik
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Water Movements
title An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A30%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20applying%20existing%20bioretention%20sizing%20methods%20to%20cold%20climates%20with%20snow%20storage%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Muthanna,%20T%20M&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=73-81&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2007.745&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E69009235%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-70bd31e421131947e354853858424825fc89f8af2b2d8fb0c4a27c99012600e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943611172&rft_id=info:pmid/18048979&rfr_iscdi=true