Loading…
Effects of thermal pretreatment on the biomethane yield and hydrolysis rate of kitchen waste
•Thermal pretreatment had varying impacts on anaerobic digestion.•Expanded research scope and comprehensive conclusions are obtained.•Characteristics of digestion kinetic are pretreatment temperature dependent.•Thermal treatment temperature is recommended to be less than 120°C. In this study, batch...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied energy 2016-06, Vol.172, p.47-58 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Thermal pretreatment had varying impacts on anaerobic digestion.•Expanded research scope and comprehensive conclusions are obtained.•Characteristics of digestion kinetic are pretreatment temperature dependent.•Thermal treatment temperature is recommended to be less than 120°C.
In this study, batch tests were performed to evaluate the effects of different thermal pretreatment temperatures (55–160°C) and durations (15–120min) on the anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste (KW). Two commonly used approaches, namely the modified Gompertz model and the approach developed by Koch and Drewes, were applied to assess the effects of the different pretreatment parameters on the biomethane yield, lag time and hydrolysis rate constant via data fitting. The subsequent anaerobic digestion of KW pretreated at 55–120°C presented greater efficiency, and longer treatment durations resulted in increased methane production and higher hydrolysis rate constants. These findings were obtained due to the lower nutrient loss observed in KW treated at lower temperature treatments compared with that found with higher temperature treatments. In general, the effects of thermal pretreatment on the lag phase and hydrolysis rate differed depending on the treatment parameters leading to the variations in the KW compositions. The soundness of the two model results was evaluated, and higher statistical indicators (R2) were found with the modified Gompertz model than with the approach developed by Koch and Drewes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-2619 1872-9118 1872-9118 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.080 |