Loading…

Final report on key comparison EURAMET.M.P-K1.c in the range 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa of gas gauge pressure

A EURAMET key comparison of the national pressure standards in the range 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa of gas gauge pressure was carried out. The circulation of the transfer standard began in November 2011 and lasted until November 2016. The measurand of the comparison was the effective area of the piston-cyli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Metrologia 2020-01, Vol.57 (1A), p.7022
Main Authors: Altıntaş, Aykurt, Koçaş, Ilknur, Durgut, Yasin, Bartolo, Joseph, Bergoglio, Mercede, Bermanec, Lovorka Grgec, Bošnjaković, Alen, Burzić, Sanja, Condereys, Antoine, Dobre, Miruna, Farar, Peter, Hetherington, Paul, Medina, Nieves, Sabuga, Wladimir, Ott, Oliver, Konczak, Thomas, Sandu, Ion, Setina, Janez, Steindl, Dietmar, Vámossy, Csilla, Waller, Bernard, Wuethrich, Christian, Brzozowski, Adam, Geel, Jan van, Saxholm, Sari, Arrhén, Fredrik
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A EURAMET key comparison of the national pressure standards in the range 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa of gas gauge pressure was carried out. The circulation of the transfer standard began in November 2011 and lasted until November 2016. The measurand of the comparison was the effective area of the piston-cylinder assembly determined by gauge pressure measurements in the range from 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa. As the comparison reference value, the weighted mean of the results of the laboratories with primary pressure standards was used. With this reference value, all the participants who delivered the results demonstrated equivalence respective to the reference value within expanded uncertainties ( k = 2) on all the range. The results of this comparison were linked to CCM key comparison CCM.P-K1.c. Also in relation to the reference values of CCM.P-K1.c, all participants demonstrated agreement within expanded uncertainties ( k = 2) at all pressure points. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
ISSN:0026-1394
1681-7575
1681-7575
DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/07022