Loading…

Theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-perspectives on ice sheet hydrology: Processes and products

Meltwater drainage through ice sheets has recently been a key focus of glaciological research due to its influence on the dynamics of ice sheets in a warming climate. However, the processes, topologies and products of ice sheet hydrology are some of the least understood components of both past and m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth-science reviews 2016-04, Vol.155, p.1-27
Main Authors: Greenwood, Sarah L., Clason, Caroline C., Helanow, Christian, Margold, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-cbc8c6248d2de68e1e52254906fb03bddd829552e5e464c16c442b71019198a73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-cbc8c6248d2de68e1e52254906fb03bddd829552e5e464c16c442b71019198a73
container_end_page 27
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Earth-science reviews
container_volume 155
creator Greenwood, Sarah L.
Clason, Caroline C.
Helanow, Christian
Margold, Martin
description Meltwater drainage through ice sheets has recently been a key focus of glaciological research due to its influence on the dynamics of ice sheets in a warming climate. However, the processes, topologies and products of ice sheet hydrology are some of the least understood components of both past and modern ice sheets. This is to some extent a result of a disconnect between the fields of theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-glaciology that each approach ice sheet hydrology from a different perspective and with different research objectives. With an increasing realisation of the potential of using the past to inform on the future of contemporary ice sheets, bridging the gaps in the understanding of ice sheet hydrology has become paramount. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about ice sheet hydrology from the perspectives of theoretical, observational and palaeo-glaciology. We then explore and discuss some of the key questions in understanding and interpretation between these research fields, including: 1) disagreement between the palaeo-record, glaciological theory and contemporary observations in the operational extent of channelised subglacial drainage and the topology of drainage systems; 2) uncertainty over the magnitude and frequency of drainage events associated with geomorphic activity; and 3) contrasts in scale between the three fields of research, both in a spatial and temporal context. The main concluding points are that modern observations, modelling experiments and inferences from the palaeo-record indicate that drainage topologies may comprise a multiplicity of forms in an amalgam of drainage modes occurring in different contexts and at different scales. Drainage under high pressure appears to dominate at ice sheet scale and might in some cases be considered efficient; the sustainability of a particular drainage mode is governed primarily by the stability of discharge. To gain better understanding of meltwater drainage under thick ice, determining what drainage topologies are reached under high pressure conditions is of primary importance. Our review attests that the interconnectivity between research sub-disciplines in progressing the field is essential, both in interpreting the palaeo-record and in developing physical understanding of glacial hydrological processes and systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_su_130882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012825216300095</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808083151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-cbc8c6248d2de68e1e52254906fb03bddd829552e5e464c16c442b71019198a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxU1podukn6GCXnqItxrZsuXelqT_IJAeklyFLM1mtXgtVyNv2W9f7W7JoZegATHiN4_Re0XxAfgSODSft0s0kayPuF-K_LDkkIu_KhagWlE2SqjXxYJzEKUSUrwt3hFtee551y6K8X6DIWLy1gxXzIYx4W4K0cQDCz1h3Jvkw2gGZkbHJjMYDOWEkSa0ye-RWBiZt8hog5jY5uBiGMLT4Qv7FYNFokycJmNws010WbxZm4Hw_b_7onj49vX--kd5e_f95_XqtjQSVCptb5VtRK2ccNgoBJRCyLrjzbrnVe-cU6KTUqDEuqktNLauRd9mPzrolGmri-LqrEt_cJp7PUW_y3_SwXh94x9XOsQnTbOGiislMv7pjOc9f89ISe88WRwGM2KYSYPi-VQg4WW0VVLUvD6pfvwP3YY5ZjNPVNV0AJJnqj1TNgaiiOvnZYHrY8J6q58T1seENYdcx8nVeRKzk3uPUWcIR4suozZpF_yLGn8B6QW0SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783691150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-perspectives on ice sheet hydrology: Processes and products</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Greenwood, Sarah L. ; Clason, Caroline C. ; Helanow, Christian ; Margold, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Sarah L. ; Clason, Caroline C. ; Helanow, Christian ; Margold, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Meltwater drainage through ice sheets has recently been a key focus of glaciological research due to its influence on the dynamics of ice sheets in a warming climate. However, the processes, topologies and products of ice sheet hydrology are some of the least understood components of both past and modern ice sheets. This is to some extent a result of a disconnect between the fields of theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-glaciology that each approach ice sheet hydrology from a different perspective and with different research objectives. With an increasing realisation of the potential of using the past to inform on the future of contemporary ice sheets, bridging the gaps in the understanding of ice sheet hydrology has become paramount. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about ice sheet hydrology from the perspectives of theoretical, observational and palaeo-glaciology. We then explore and discuss some of the key questions in understanding and interpretation between these research fields, including: 1) disagreement between the palaeo-record, glaciological theory and contemporary observations in the operational extent of channelised subglacial drainage and the topology of drainage systems; 2) uncertainty over the magnitude and frequency of drainage events associated with geomorphic activity; and 3) contrasts in scale between the three fields of research, both in a spatial and temporal context. The main concluding points are that modern observations, modelling experiments and inferences from the palaeo-record indicate that drainage topologies may comprise a multiplicity of forms in an amalgam of drainage modes occurring in different contexts and at different scales. Drainage under high pressure appears to dominate at ice sheet scale and might in some cases be considered efficient; the sustainability of a particular drainage mode is governed primarily by the stability of discharge. To gain better understanding of meltwater drainage under thick ice, determining what drainage topologies are reached under high pressure conditions is of primary importance. Our review attests that the interconnectivity between research sub-disciplines in progressing the field is essential, both in interpreting the palaeo-record and in developing physical understanding of glacial hydrological processes and systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-8252</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-6828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESREAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amalgams ; Drainage ; Drainage systems ; Eskers ; Glacial geomorphology ; Glacial hydrology ; Hydrology ; Ice ; Ice sheet hydrology ; Ice sheets ; Meltwater ; Meltwater channels ; naturgeografi ; Physical Geography ; Sustainability ; Topology ; Water</subject><ispartof>Earth-science reviews, 2016-04, Vol.155, p.1-27</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-cbc8c6248d2de68e1e52254906fb03bddd829552e5e464c16c442b71019198a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-cbc8c6248d2de68e1e52254906fb03bddd829552e5e464c16c442b71019198a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-130882$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clason, Caroline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helanow, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margold, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-perspectives on ice sheet hydrology: Processes and products</title><title>Earth-science reviews</title><description>Meltwater drainage through ice sheets has recently been a key focus of glaciological research due to its influence on the dynamics of ice sheets in a warming climate. However, the processes, topologies and products of ice sheet hydrology are some of the least understood components of both past and modern ice sheets. This is to some extent a result of a disconnect between the fields of theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-glaciology that each approach ice sheet hydrology from a different perspective and with different research objectives. With an increasing realisation of the potential of using the past to inform on the future of contemporary ice sheets, bridging the gaps in the understanding of ice sheet hydrology has become paramount. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about ice sheet hydrology from the perspectives of theoretical, observational and palaeo-glaciology. We then explore and discuss some of the key questions in understanding and interpretation between these research fields, including: 1) disagreement between the palaeo-record, glaciological theory and contemporary observations in the operational extent of channelised subglacial drainage and the topology of drainage systems; 2) uncertainty over the magnitude and frequency of drainage events associated with geomorphic activity; and 3) contrasts in scale between the three fields of research, both in a spatial and temporal context. The main concluding points are that modern observations, modelling experiments and inferences from the palaeo-record indicate that drainage topologies may comprise a multiplicity of forms in an amalgam of drainage modes occurring in different contexts and at different scales. Drainage under high pressure appears to dominate at ice sheet scale and might in some cases be considered efficient; the sustainability of a particular drainage mode is governed primarily by the stability of discharge. To gain better understanding of meltwater drainage under thick ice, determining what drainage topologies are reached under high pressure conditions is of primary importance. Our review attests that the interconnectivity between research sub-disciplines in progressing the field is essential, both in interpreting the palaeo-record and in developing physical understanding of glacial hydrological processes and systems.</description><subject>Amalgams</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage systems</subject><subject>Eskers</subject><subject>Glacial geomorphology</subject><subject>Glacial hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice sheet hydrology</subject><subject>Ice sheets</subject><subject>Meltwater</subject><subject>Meltwater channels</subject><subject>naturgeografi</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0012-8252</issn><issn>1872-6828</issn><issn>1872-6828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxU1podukn6GCXnqItxrZsuXelqT_IJAeklyFLM1mtXgtVyNv2W9f7W7JoZegATHiN4_Re0XxAfgSODSft0s0kayPuF-K_LDkkIu_KhagWlE2SqjXxYJzEKUSUrwt3hFtee551y6K8X6DIWLy1gxXzIYx4W4K0cQDCz1h3Jvkw2gGZkbHJjMYDOWEkSa0ye-RWBiZt8hog5jY5uBiGMLT4Qv7FYNFokycJmNws010WbxZm4Hw_b_7onj49vX--kd5e_f95_XqtjQSVCptb5VtRK2ccNgoBJRCyLrjzbrnVe-cU6KTUqDEuqktNLauRd9mPzrolGmri-LqrEt_cJp7PUW_y3_SwXh94x9XOsQnTbOGiislMv7pjOc9f89ISe88WRwGM2KYSYPi-VQg4WW0VVLUvD6pfvwP3YY5ZjNPVNV0AJJnqj1TNgaiiOvnZYHrY8J6q58T1seENYdcx8nVeRKzk3uPUWcIR4suozZpF_yLGn8B6QW0SQ</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Greenwood, Sarah L.</creator><creator>Clason, Caroline C.</creator><creator>Helanow, Christian</creator><creator>Margold, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DG7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-perspectives on ice sheet hydrology: Processes and products</title><author>Greenwood, Sarah L. ; Clason, Caroline C. ; Helanow, Christian ; Margold, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-cbc8c6248d2de68e1e52254906fb03bddd829552e5e464c16c442b71019198a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amalgams</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage systems</topic><topic>Eskers</topic><topic>Glacial geomorphology</topic><topic>Glacial hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice sheet hydrology</topic><topic>Ice sheets</topic><topic>Meltwater</topic><topic>Meltwater channels</topic><topic>naturgeografi</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clason, Caroline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helanow, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margold, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet</collection><jtitle>Earth-science reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenwood, Sarah L.</au><au>Clason, Caroline C.</au><au>Helanow, Christian</au><au>Margold, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-perspectives on ice sheet hydrology: Processes and products</atitle><jtitle>Earth-science reviews</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>155</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><issn>0012-8252</issn><issn>1872-6828</issn><eissn>1872-6828</eissn><coden>ESREAV</coden><abstract>Meltwater drainage through ice sheets has recently been a key focus of glaciological research due to its influence on the dynamics of ice sheets in a warming climate. However, the processes, topologies and products of ice sheet hydrology are some of the least understood components of both past and modern ice sheets. This is to some extent a result of a disconnect between the fields of theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-glaciology that each approach ice sheet hydrology from a different perspective and with different research objectives. With an increasing realisation of the potential of using the past to inform on the future of contemporary ice sheets, bridging the gaps in the understanding of ice sheet hydrology has become paramount. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about ice sheet hydrology from the perspectives of theoretical, observational and palaeo-glaciology. We then explore and discuss some of the key questions in understanding and interpretation between these research fields, including: 1) disagreement between the palaeo-record, glaciological theory and contemporary observations in the operational extent of channelised subglacial drainage and the topology of drainage systems; 2) uncertainty over the magnitude and frequency of drainage events associated with geomorphic activity; and 3) contrasts in scale between the three fields of research, both in a spatial and temporal context. The main concluding points are that modern observations, modelling experiments and inferences from the palaeo-record indicate that drainage topologies may comprise a multiplicity of forms in an amalgam of drainage modes occurring in different contexts and at different scales. Drainage under high pressure appears to dominate at ice sheet scale and might in some cases be considered efficient; the sustainability of a particular drainage mode is governed primarily by the stability of discharge. To gain better understanding of meltwater drainage under thick ice, determining what drainage topologies are reached under high pressure conditions is of primary importance. Our review attests that the interconnectivity between research sub-disciplines in progressing the field is essential, both in interpreting the palaeo-record and in developing physical understanding of glacial hydrological processes and systems.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.010</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-8252
ispartof Earth-science reviews, 2016-04, Vol.155, p.1-27
issn 0012-8252
1872-6828
1872-6828
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_su_130882
source Elsevier
subjects Amalgams
Drainage
Drainage systems
Eskers
Glacial geomorphology
Glacial hydrology
Hydrology
Ice
Ice sheet hydrology
Ice sheets
Meltwater
Meltwater channels
naturgeografi
Physical Geography
Sustainability
Topology
Water
title Theoretical, contemporary observational and palaeo-perspectives on ice sheet hydrology: Processes and products
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A10%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theoretical,%20contemporary%20observational%20and%20palaeo-perspectives%20on%20ice%20sheet%20hydrology:%20Processes%20and%20products&rft.jtitle=Earth-science%20reviews&rft.au=Greenwood,%20Sarah%20L.&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=155&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.issn=0012-8252&rft.eissn=1872-6828&rft.coden=ESREAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1808083151%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a518t-cbc8c6248d2de68e1e52254906fb03bddd829552e5e464c16c442b71019198a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783691150&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true