The concept of terroir tested: sharing of the same terroir between two EU Member States

This article looks into wine as a credence product, whose bond of trust is vested in the concept of terroir as a signal to the consumer that the wine she or he is buying originates from a specific location and is made in specific circumstances. The main question of the present analysis is what the l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of intellectual property law & practice 2021-04, Vol.16 (4-5), p.435-441
Main Author: Marušić, Branka
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
credence product
geographical indications
terroir
wine
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 441
container_issue 4-5
container_start_page 435
container_title Journal of intellectual property law & practice
container_volume 16
creator Marušić, Branka
description This article looks into wine as a credence product, whose bond of trust is vested in the concept of terroir as a signal to the consumer that the wine she or he is buying originates from a specific location and is made in specific circumstances. The main question of the present analysis is what the legal consequences are when such terroir is shared between two EU Member States, looking into the examples of wines Tokaj and Teran.Arguments advanced in the article are that, on the EU-wide level, there are two effects of the shared terroir. The first effect is a shared PDO; and the second effect is an artificial enlargement of terroir that is not linked to the original geographical position. 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jiplp/jpab019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_su_193761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jiplp/jpab019</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jiplp/jpab019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-2da006eb183561889008640f2edb29777f1fd031ddd725a865bdb0069e00f5fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqUwsntkIPQ5TuKErSrlQypioIXRsuPnNlVbW3aqin9PaKuuTPdK79w3HEJuGTwwqPhg2fiVHyy90sCqM9JjIhMJyzM4P3WeXpKrGJcAWdd5j3xPF0hrt6nRt9RZ2mIIrgldxhbNI40LFZrNfH_qyKjWeGI0tjvEDW13jo5n9B3XGgP9bFU3viYXVq0i3hyzT2bP4-noNZl8vLyNhpOk5ilrk9QogAI1K3lesLKsAMoiA5ui0WklhLDMGuDMGCPSXJVFro3uFhUC2Nwi75P7w9-4Q7_V0odmrcKPdKqRT83XULowl3ErWcVFwTo8OeB1cDEGtKcBA_knUe4lyqPEjr878G7r_0F_AVjidTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The concept of terroir tested: sharing of the same terroir between two EU Member States</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Marušić, Branka</creator><creatorcontrib>Marušić, Branka</creatorcontrib><description>This article looks into wine as a credence product, whose bond of trust is vested in the concept of terroir as a signal to the consumer that the wine she or he is buying originates from a specific location and is made in specific circumstances. The main question of the present analysis is what the legal consequences are when such terroir is shared between two EU Member States, looking into the examples of wines Tokaj and Teran.Arguments advanced in the article are that, on the EU-wide level, there are two effects of the shared terroir. The first effect is a shared PDO; and the second effect is an artificial enlargement of terroir that is not linked to the original geographical position. </description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-1532</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1747-1540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-1540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpab019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>credence product ; geographical indications ; terroir ; wine</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual property law &amp; practice, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4-5), p.435-441</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-193761$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marušić, Branka</creatorcontrib><title>The concept of terroir tested: sharing of the same terroir between two EU Member States</title><title>Journal of intellectual property law &amp; practice</title><description>This article looks into wine as a credence product, whose bond of trust is vested in the concept of terroir as a signal to the consumer that the wine she or he is buying originates from a specific location and is made in specific circumstances. The main question of the present analysis is what the legal consequences are when such terroir is shared between two EU Member States, looking into the examples of wines Tokaj and Teran.Arguments advanced in the article are that, on the EU-wide level, there are two effects of the shared terroir. The first effect is a shared PDO; and the second effect is an artificial enlargement of terroir that is not linked to the original geographical position. </description><subject>credence product</subject><subject>geographical indications</subject><subject>terroir</subject><subject>wine</subject><issn>1747-1532</issn><issn>1747-1540</issn><issn>1747-1540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqUwsntkIPQ5TuKErSrlQypioIXRsuPnNlVbW3aqin9PaKuuTPdK79w3HEJuGTwwqPhg2fiVHyy90sCqM9JjIhMJyzM4P3WeXpKrGJcAWdd5j3xPF0hrt6nRt9RZ2mIIrgldxhbNI40LFZrNfH_qyKjWeGI0tjvEDW13jo5n9B3XGgP9bFU3viYXVq0i3hyzT2bP4-noNZl8vLyNhpOk5ilrk9QogAI1K3lesLKsAMoiA5ui0WklhLDMGuDMGCPSXJVFro3uFhUC2Nwi75P7w9-4Q7_V0odmrcKPdKqRT83XULowl3ErWcVFwTo8OeB1cDEGtKcBA_knUe4lyqPEjr878G7r_0F_AVjidTw</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Marušić, Branka</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DG7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>The concept of terroir tested: sharing of the same terroir between two EU Member States</title><author>Marušić, Branka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-2da006eb183561889008640f2edb29777f1fd031ddd725a865bdb0069e00f5fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>credence product</topic><topic>geographical indications</topic><topic>terroir</topic><topic>wine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marušić, Branka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual property law &amp; practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marušić, Branka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The concept of terroir tested: sharing of the same terroir between two EU Member States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual property law &amp; practice</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4-5</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>435-441</pages><issn>1747-1532</issn><issn>1747-1540</issn><eissn>1747-1540</eissn><abstract>This article looks into wine as a credence product, whose bond of trust is vested in the concept of terroir as a signal to the consumer that the wine she or he is buying originates from a specific location and is made in specific circumstances. The main question of the present analysis is what the legal consequences are when such terroir is shared between two EU Member States, looking into the examples of wines Tokaj and Teran.Arguments advanced in the article are that, on the EU-wide level, there are two effects of the shared terroir. The first effect is a shared PDO; and the second effect is an artificial enlargement of terroir that is not linked to the original geographical position. </abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jiplp/jpab019</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-1532
ispartof Journal of intellectual property law & practice, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4-5), p.435-441
issn 1747-1532
1747-1540
1747-1540
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_su_193761
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects credence product
geographical indications
terroir
wine
title The concept of terroir tested: sharing of the same terroir between two EU Member States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A06%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20concept%20of%20terroir%20tested:%20sharing%20of%20the%20same%20terroir%20between%20two%20EU%20Member%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20property%20law%20&%20practice&rft.au=Maru%C5%A1i%C4%87,%20Branka&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4-5&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=435-441&rft.issn=1747-1532&rft.eissn=1747-1540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpab019&rft_dat=%3Coup_swepu%3E10.1093/jiplp/jpab019%3C/oup_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-2da006eb183561889008640f2edb29777f1fd031ddd725a865bdb0069e00f5fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jiplp/jpab019&rfr_iscdi=true