Reconciling and Improving Formulations for Thermodynamics and Conservation Principles in Earth System Models (ESMs)

• Published in: Journal of advances in modeling earth systems 2022-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1-n/a
• Main Authors: Lauritzen, P. H., Kevlahan, N. K.‐R., Toniazzo, T., Eldred, C., Dubos, T., Gassmann, A., Larson, V. E., Jablonowski, C., Guba, O., Shipway, B., Harrop, B. E., Lemarié, F., Tailleux, R., Herrington, A. R., Large, W., Rasch, P. J., Donahue, A. S., Wan, H., Conley, A., Bacmeister, J. T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis of PDEs; Approximation; Atmosphere; Atmospheric models; Climate change; Components; Conservation; Conservation principles; consistency; dynamical cores energy errors; dynamical cores energy errors/consistency; Energy budget; energy budget analysis; Energy conservation; Energy dissipation; Energy exchange; energy fixer; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Errors; Evaporation; Mathematics; Modelling; Ocean, Atmosphere; parameterization energy errors; parameterization energy errors/consistency; Physics; Precipitation; Radiation; Sciences of the Universe; thermodynamic consistency; Thermodynamics
• ISSN: 1942-2466; 1942-2466
• DOI: 10.1029/2022MS003117

This paper provides a comprehensive derivation of the total energy equations for the atmospheric components of Earth System Models (ESMs). The assumptions and approximations made in this derivation are motivated and discussed. In particular, it is emphasized that closing the energy budget is conceptually challenging and hard to achieve in practice without resorting to ad hoc fixers. As a concrete example, the energy budget terms are diagnosed in a realistic climate simulation using a global atmosphere model. The largest total energy errors in this example are spurious dynamical core energy dissipation, thermodynamic inconsistencies (e.g., coupling parameterizations with the host model) and missing processes/terms associated with falling precipitation and evaporation (e.g., enthalpy flux between components). The latter two errors are not, in general, reduced by increasing horizontal resolution. They are due to incomplete thermodynamic and dynamic formulations. Future research directions are proposed to reconcile and improve thermodynamics formulations and conservation principles. Plain Language Summary Earth System Models (ESMs) have numerous total energy budget errors. This article establishes the governing total energy equations for large‐scale ESMs and assesses the energy budget errors in real‐world simulations in a widely used climate model. To move towards a closed energy budget in ESMs, further research on total energy conserving discretizations (in the dynamical core), unified thermodynamics (through thermodynamic potentials/conserved variables) and missing processes is paramount. This research is especially important since some of the energy budget errors will not improve with higher spatial resolution and may even get worse. Key Points Closing total energy budgets in Earth System Models without ad hoc fixers is a monumental task Largest errors are from missing processes/terms, thermodynamic inconsistencies and dynamical core Further research is needed on conservative discretizations, unified thermodynamics and missing processes