The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales

• Published in: Oecologia 2023-06, Vol.202 (2), p.261-273
• Main Authors: Måsviken, Johannes, Dalén, Love, Norén, Karin, Dalerum, Fredrik
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abiotic factors; Analysis; Araneae; Biodiversity; Biodiversity dimensions; Biological diversity; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Climatic conditions; Community regulation; Ecology; Ecosystem; Elevation; Environmental conditions; Environmental gradients; Environmental quality; Functional diversity; Geomorphology; Hydrology/Water Resources; Laws, regulations and rules; Life Sciences; Original Research; Phylogenetic diversity; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Plant Sciences; Spatial scale; Spiders; Surveys; Sweden; Taxonomic diversity; Taxonomy; Variation; Vegetation
• ISSN: 0029-8549; 1432-1939; 1432-1939
• DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0

Both abiotic and biotic conditions may be important for biodiversity. However, their relative importance may vary among different diversity dimensions as well as across spatial scales. Spiders (Araneae) offer an ecologically relevant system for evaluating variation in the relative strength abiotic and biotic biodiversity regulation. We quantified the relative importance of abiotic and biotic conditions for three diversity dimensions of spider communities quantified across two spatial scales. Spiders were surveyed along elevation gradients in northern Sweden. We focused our analysis on geomorphological and climatic conditions as well as vegetation characteristics, and quantified the relative importance of these conditions for the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spider communities sampled across one intermediate (500 m) and one local (25 m) scale. There were stronger relationships among diversity dimensions at the local than the intermediate scale. There were also variation in the relative influence of abiotic and biotic conditions among diversity dimensions, but this variation was not consistent across spatial scales. Across both spatial scales, vegetation was related to all diversity dimensions whereas climate was important for phylogenetic and functional diversity. Our study does not fully support stronger abiotic regulation at coarser scales, and conversely stronger abiotic regulation at more local scales. Instead, our results indicate that community assembly is shaped by interactions between abiotic constrains in species distributions and biotic conditions, and that such interactions may be both scale and context dependent.