Loading…
Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation
Causal inference with observational data can be performed under an assumption of no unobserved confounders (unconfoundedness assumption). There is, however, seldom clear subject-matter or empirical evidence for such an assumption. We therefore develop uncertainty intervals for average causal effects...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biometrics 2019-06, Vol.75 (2), p.506-515 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-520e30da6267e933f83409c0e39400dfa77c2f854fd63666f7e1b764be7787723 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-520e30da6267e933f83409c0e39400dfa77c2f854fd63666f7e1b764be7787723 |
container_end_page | 515 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 506 |
container_title | Biometrics |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Genbäck, Minna de Luna, Xavier |
description | Causal inference with observational data can be performed under an assumption of no unobserved confounders (unconfoundedness assumption). There is, however, seldom clear subject-matter or empirical evidence for such an assumption. We therefore develop uncertainty intervals for average causal effects based on outcome regression estimators and doubly robust estimators, which provide inference taking into account both sampling variability and uncertainty due to unobserved confounders. In contrast with sampling variation, uncertainty due to unobserved confounding does not decrease with increasing sample size. The intervals introduced are obtained by modeling the treatment assignment mechanism and its correlation with the outcome given the observed confounders, allowing us to derive the bias of the estimators due to unobserved confounders. We are thus also able to contrast the size of the bias due to violation of the unconfoundedness assumption, with bias due to misspecification of the models used to explain potential outcomes. This is illustrated through numerical experiments where bias due to moderate unobserved confounding dominates misspecification bias for typical situations in terms of sample size and modeling assumptions. We also study the empirical coverage of the uncertainty intervals introduced and apply the results to a study of the effect of regular food intake on health. An R-package implementing the inference proposed is available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/biom.13001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_153868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45213453</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45213453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-520e30da6267e933f83409c0e39400dfa77c2f854fd63666f7e1b764be7787723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModlu98QdIQIQiTM13Zi_r-lWo9EbFu5DJnCyzzCRrMrHsvzfrtEW8MDcheZ_znnN4EXpByQWt5203xOmCckLoI7SiUtCGCEYeoxUhRDVc0B8n6DTnXX2uJWFP0QknghMp-AqNG1uyHfEQPCQIDrB1LpYwD2GLfUy4hNhlSL-gxy4GX6X-KFk_Q8KxzC5OgBNsE-Q8xIBt6HEfSzcecIpdyTOGPA-Tnav4DD3xdszw_O4-Q98-fvi6-dxc33y62lxeN04wSRvJCHDSW8WUhjXnvuWCrF39XAtCem-1dsy3UvhecaWU10A7rUQHWrdaM36GmsU338K-dGaf6gDpYKIdzPvh-6WJaWvKVAyVvFVt5c8Xfp_iz1LnNdOQHYyjDRBLNoxy3jKp1qKir_5Bd7GkULcxjOnaXzChKvVmoVyKOSfwDyNQYo6ZmWNm5k9mFX55Z1m6CfoH9D6kCtAFuB1GOPzHyry7uvlyb_p6qdnlOaa_axgn2ghZdxKS899qHK18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2277784246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Genbäck, Minna ; de Luna, Xavier</creator><creatorcontrib>Genbäck, Minna ; de Luna, Xavier</creatorcontrib><description>Causal inference with observational data can be performed under an assumption of no unobserved confounders (unconfoundedness assumption). There is, however, seldom clear subject-matter or empirical evidence for such an assumption. We therefore develop uncertainty intervals for average causal effects based on outcome regression estimators and doubly robust estimators, which provide inference taking into account both sampling variability and uncertainty due to unobserved confounders. In contrast with sampling variation, uncertainty due to unobserved confounding does not decrease with increasing sample size. The intervals introduced are obtained by modeling the treatment assignment mechanism and its correlation with the outcome given the observed confounders, allowing us to derive the bias of the estimators due to unobserved confounders. We are thus also able to contrast the size of the bias due to violation of the unconfoundedness assumption, with bias due to misspecification of the models used to explain potential outcomes. This is illustrated through numerical experiments where bias due to moderate unobserved confounding dominates misspecification bias for typical situations in terms of sample size and modeling assumptions. We also study the empirical coverage of the uncertainty intervals introduced and apply the results to a study of the effect of regular food intake on health. An R-package implementing the inference proposed is available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-341X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1541-0420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/biom.13001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30430543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Average causal effects ; Bias ; Causality ; Computer Simulation ; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; DISCUSSION PAPERS ; double robust ; Eating - physiology ; Economic models ; Estimators ; Food intake ; Health ; Humans ; ignorability assumption ; Inference ; Intervals ; Observational Studies as Topic ; regular food intake ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Sample Size ; Sampling ; sensitivity analysis ; Statistics ; statistik ; Uncertainty ; uncertainty intervals</subject><ispartof>Biometrics, 2019-06, Vol.75 (2), p.506-515</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 International Biometric Society</rights><rights>2019 International Biometric Society</rights><rights>2019 International Biometric Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-520e30da6267e933f83409c0e39400dfa77c2f854fd63666f7e1b764be7787723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-520e30da6267e933f83409c0e39400dfa77c2f854fd63666f7e1b764be7787723</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3187-1987 ; 0000-0002-9107-6486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30430543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-153868$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Genbäck, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Luna, Xavier</creatorcontrib><title>Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation</title><title>Biometrics</title><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><description>Causal inference with observational data can be performed under an assumption of no unobserved confounders (unconfoundedness assumption). There is, however, seldom clear subject-matter or empirical evidence for such an assumption. We therefore develop uncertainty intervals for average causal effects based on outcome regression estimators and doubly robust estimators, which provide inference taking into account both sampling variability and uncertainty due to unobserved confounders. In contrast with sampling variation, uncertainty due to unobserved confounding does not decrease with increasing sample size. The intervals introduced are obtained by modeling the treatment assignment mechanism and its correlation with the outcome given the observed confounders, allowing us to derive the bias of the estimators due to unobserved confounders. We are thus also able to contrast the size of the bias due to violation of the unconfoundedness assumption, with bias due to misspecification of the models used to explain potential outcomes. This is illustrated through numerical experiments where bias due to moderate unobserved confounding dominates misspecification bias for typical situations in terms of sample size and modeling assumptions. We also study the empirical coverage of the uncertainty intervals introduced and apply the results to a study of the effect of regular food intake on health. An R-package implementing the inference proposed is available.</description><subject>Average causal effects</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>DISCUSSION PAPERS</subject><subject>double robust</subject><subject>Eating - physiology</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ignorability assumption</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>regular food intake</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>statistik</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>uncertainty intervals</subject><issn>0006-341X</issn><issn>1541-0420</issn><issn>1541-0420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModlu98QdIQIQiTM13Zi_r-lWo9EbFu5DJnCyzzCRrMrHsvzfrtEW8MDcheZ_znnN4EXpByQWt5203xOmCckLoI7SiUtCGCEYeoxUhRDVc0B8n6DTnXX2uJWFP0QknghMp-AqNG1uyHfEQPCQIDrB1LpYwD2GLfUy4hNhlSL-gxy4GX6X-KFk_Q8KxzC5OgBNsE-Q8xIBt6HEfSzcecIpdyTOGPA-Tnav4DD3xdszw_O4-Q98-fvi6-dxc33y62lxeN04wSRvJCHDSW8WUhjXnvuWCrF39XAtCem-1dsy3UvhecaWU10A7rUQHWrdaM36GmsU338K-dGaf6gDpYKIdzPvh-6WJaWvKVAyVvFVt5c8Xfp_iz1LnNdOQHYyjDRBLNoxy3jKp1qKir_5Bd7GkULcxjOnaXzChKvVmoVyKOSfwDyNQYo6ZmWNm5k9mFX55Z1m6CfoH9D6kCtAFuB1GOPzHyry7uvlyb_p6qdnlOaa_axgn2ghZdxKS899qHK18</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Genbäck, Minna</creator><creator>de Luna, Xavier</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D93</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-1987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-6486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation</title><author>Genbäck, Minna ; de Luna, Xavier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-520e30da6267e933f83409c0e39400dfa77c2f854fd63666f7e1b764be7787723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Average causal effects</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>DISCUSSION PAPERS</topic><topic>double robust</topic><topic>Eating - physiology</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ignorability assumption</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>regular food intake</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>statistik</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>uncertainty intervals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Genbäck, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Luna, Xavier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Genbäck, Minna</au><au>de Luna, Xavier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation</atitle><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>506-515</pages><issn>0006-341X</issn><issn>1541-0420</issn><eissn>1541-0420</eissn><abstract>Causal inference with observational data can be performed under an assumption of no unobserved confounders (unconfoundedness assumption). There is, however, seldom clear subject-matter or empirical evidence for such an assumption. We therefore develop uncertainty intervals for average causal effects based on outcome regression estimators and doubly robust estimators, which provide inference taking into account both sampling variability and uncertainty due to unobserved confounders. In contrast with sampling variation, uncertainty due to unobserved confounding does not decrease with increasing sample size. The intervals introduced are obtained by modeling the treatment assignment mechanism and its correlation with the outcome given the observed confounders, allowing us to derive the bias of the estimators due to unobserved confounders. We are thus also able to contrast the size of the bias due to violation of the unconfoundedness assumption, with bias due to misspecification of the models used to explain potential outcomes. This is illustrated through numerical experiments where bias due to moderate unobserved confounding dominates misspecification bias for typical situations in terms of sample size and modeling assumptions. We also study the empirical coverage of the uncertainty intervals introduced and apply the results to a study of the effect of regular food intake on health. An R-package implementing the inference proposed is available.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30430543</pmid><doi>10.1111/biom.13001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-1987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-6486</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-341X |
ispartof | Biometrics, 2019-06, Vol.75 (2), p.506-515 |
issn | 0006-341X 1541-0420 1541-0420 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_153868 |
source | EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list) |
subjects | Average causal effects Bias Causality Computer Simulation Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic Data Interpretation, Statistical DISCUSSION PAPERS double robust Eating - physiology Economic models Estimators Food intake Health Humans ignorability assumption Inference Intervals Observational Studies as Topic regular food intake Robustness (mathematics) Sample Size Sampling sensitivity analysis Statistics statistik Uncertainty uncertainty intervals |
title | Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A07%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Causal%20inference%20accounting%20for%20unobserved%20confounding%20after%20outcome%20regression%20and%20doubly%20robust%20estimation&rft.jtitle=Biometrics&rft.au=Genb%C3%A4ck,%20Minna&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=506-515&rft.issn=0006-341X&rft.eissn=1541-0420&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/biom.13001&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E45213453%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-520e30da6267e933f83409c0e39400dfa77c2f854fd63666f7e1b764be7787723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2277784246&rft_id=info:pmid/30430543&rft_jstor_id=45213453&rfr_iscdi=true |